[I didn't realise Joe's question was Cc'd to the list. I replied
privately days ago.]
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 09:28:43PM +, Joe Kraft wrote:
have you found out any more about why it's not working? I'm also
curious about the entry in mailertable because my feeble attempt
didn't work.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:03:05PM -0500, Niy wrote:
Just a quick thought, I had a similar problem on my LAN. I set up
/etc/hosts files, and that did the trick for me.
This was one of the first things I tried. It didn't work in the
particular situation I described.
--
Paul.
w
Hi,
Firstly, thanks for the comprehensive reply.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:06:32AM +0100, J65nko BSD wrote:
It could be that the MS Windows DNS server, which is derived
from/patterned after named or however you want to call it, suffers
from a similar defect. Being not familiar with the MS
Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:54:42PM +1030, Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
I am told it's running Windows 2000 DNS Server. Presumably that's
Microsoft's own DNS implementation built into Windows 2000.
(By 'sometimes' I don't mean it's non-deterministic. Every time
sendmail asks for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Kraft
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:29 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail: host name lookup failure
Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:54:42PM +1030, Paul
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:09:08 +1030, Paul A. Hoadley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:54:42PM +1030, Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
I have actually solved the problem. I intend to post a summary for
the archive when I return to the site later in the week, at which
time I'll be
Hi Chuck,
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
That hostname gets an NXDOMAIN failure from here:
Sorry, I should have been more explicit in the original: the
nameserver in question is serving a private LAN in the 192.168 space.
I have actually solved the problem. I
Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
[ ... ]
Dec 16 11:19:08 bert sendmail[1043]: iBF403Wb004664:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1001/1001),
delay=20:49:05, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=4770661,
relay=tsb.coremedicalsolutions.com., dsn=4.0.0,
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:32:58AM +1030, Paul A. Hoadley wrote:
I have a series of mails in the queue, failing on delivery attempts
like this:
Dec 16 11:19:08 bert sendmail[1043]: iBF403Wb004664:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul A. Hoadley writes:
There are numerous hits from Google on very similar issues, but
almost all the solutions point at DNS problems. If there is a
local DNS issue, I can't find it.
Because it may not be what you think.
Yesterday, I upgraded my -CURRENT system from
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:27:40PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
I was totally confused ... until I did ps -ax | grep named and
found an unrequested -t /var/named at the end of the command line.
So what's that about? -t causes named to run chrooted, per entry
20040928. That's not
Hello,
I have just upgraded a machine from 5.2.1 to 5.3, and I think I _may_
have stomped on something in /etc/mail during mergemaster. The
symptom is this: mail to other machines on the LAN worked yesterday,
and is broken after the upgrade. Mail to the wider Internet continues
to work.
I have
Jeff Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The other day I rebooted my FreeBSD machine. Ever since then, messages to
hotmail.com and yahoogroups.com are not going through - the mail logs
report that there is a 'host name lookup failure' to the specific MX
hosts (eg 'mx1.hotmail.com'). The thing
Hello ...
The other day I rebooted my FreeBSD machine. Ever since then, messages to
hotmail.com and yahoogroups.com are not going through - the mail logs
report that there is a 'host name lookup failure' to the specific MX
hosts (eg 'mx1.hotmail.com'). The thing is though, I can run
14 matches
Mail list logo
