On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 07:28:24AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
I have been having problems with several different programs lately.
Would there be any serious drawback to simply setting: WITH_DEBUG=
in the /etc/make.conf file to force everything I build/rebuild to be
built with debug symbols?
No.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 07:28:24AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
I have been having problems with several different programs lately.
Would there be any serious drawback to simply setting: WITH_DEBUG=
in the /etc/make.conf file to force
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Aug 1 06:28:18 2010
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 07:28:24 -0400
From: Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Setting Debug flag in /etc/make.conf
I have been having problems with several different programs lately
Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com writes:
I have been having problems with several different programs lately.
Would there be any serious drawback to simply setting: WITH_DEBUG=
in the /etc/make.conf file to force everything I build/rebuild to be
built with debug symbols? I am assuming
I have been having problems with several different programs lately.
Would there be any serious drawback to simply setting: WITH_DEBUG=
in the /etc/make.conf file to force everything I build/rebuild to be
built with debug symbols? I am assuming that I can simply place that
flag in the make.conf
(resending, previous mail didn't show up in the list archive)
Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net writes:
I have been having problems with several different programs lately.
Would there be any serious drawback to simply setting: WITH_DEBUG=
You'd lose `-O2' compiler-specific optimization. If
