.
In the course of reading literature for research, it often happens
that I find myself wanted to return to something I have previously
read, but I only recall a few things about the article, often the
author and a keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for
local use only) that can be easily used
2009/6/9 Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com:
I'm trying to convert all PDF files in a directory to text using
pdftotext. I tried the following command:
$ find *.pdf | xargs -0 pdftotext
Error: Couldn't open file 'Ross-JAMA-2007 (Prostate Screening Strategies).pdf
Sanda-JAMA-2009
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/9 Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com:
I'm trying to convert all PDF files in a directory to text using
pdftotext. I tried the following command:
$ find *.pdf | xargs -0 pdftotext
Error: Couldn't open file 'Ross-JAMA-2007 (Prostate Screening Strategies).pdf
$ find *.pdf -exec pdftotext {} \;
Error: Document has not the mandatory ending %EOF
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Daniel Underwood wrote:
$ find *.pdf -exec pdftotext {} \;
Error: Document has not the mandatory ending %EOF
Have you run pdftotext on a single file in your archive as a test?
--Joseph Lenox
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hmm.. The command
find *.pdf -exec pdftotext {} \;
works in directories in which no PDF file returns the Document has
not the mandatory ending %EOF error. When a directory contains one
of these files, none of the files get converted. Is there some way to
ignore or skip over this %EOF problem
Daniel Underwood wrote:
Yes, it works fine on most PDFs. There are a couple that give me:
$ pdftotext Sanda-JAMA-2009\ \(Prostate\ Cancer\ Treatment\).pdf
Error: Document has not the mandatory ending %EOF
It's probably an issue with the PDF itself, not with the program.
--Joseph Lenox
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:07:03 -0500, LoH lordofhyph...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Underwood wrote:
Yes, it works fine on most PDFs. There are a couple that give me:
$ pdftotext Sanda-JAMA-2009\ \(Prostate\ Cancer\ Treatment\).pdf
Error: Document has not the mandatory ending %EOF
I retrieved a fresh copy of the error-causing PDF, and now all is
well. Thanks for all the excellent help!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Daniel,
I'm trying to convert all PDF files in a directory to text using
pdftotext. I tried the following command:
Aside from the syntax of the command find(1) and some article that may
be in corrupted PDF, you may consider hacking pdftotext to skip the
do not print flag in some of the PDF
for research, it often happens
that I find myself wanted to return to something I have previously
read, but I only recall a few things about the article, often the
author and a keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for
local use only) that can be easily used for this purpose
my local drive.
In the course of reading literature for research, it often happens
that I find myself wanted to return to something I have previously
read, but I only recall a few things about the article, often the
author and a keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for
local
that I find myself wanted to return to something I have previously
read, but I only recall a few things about the article, often the
author and a keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for
local use only) that can be easily used for this purpose? (The
closest things that comes
Poly and LoH: Thanks, these are great ideas!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.
In the course of reading literature for research, it often happens
that I find myself wanted to return to something I have previously
read, but I only recall a few things about the article, often the
author and a keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for
local use only
of reading literature for research, it often happens
that I find myself wanted to return to something I have previously
read, but I only recall a few things about the article, often the
author and a keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for
local use only) that can be easily used
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:45:38 -0400, Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com
wrote:
Poly and LoH: Thanks, these are great ideas!
I'd like to add that if you define your data fields well, you
can use it to generate BibTeX and other LaTeX entries from your
records.
You can even easily turn it into
local drive.
Hello,
Might be overkill for one person but this is the software our
scientists use in our place, quite a good application :
http://wikindx.sourceforge.net/features.html
Cheers,
Steph
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to manage my personal collection of research
articles. Ideally I'd like some way to keep records on authors,
keywords, journals, and publication years of articles (PDF files)
downloaded onto my local drive.
Certainly overkill, but dspace(.org) can keep up a digital
and a
D keyword. Is there some inventory/database software (for local use only)
D that can be easily used for this purpose? (The closest things that comes
D to mind (conceptually) is image collection software.)
Are these PDF files generated by scanning journal pages, or do they
contain text
Since all the PDFs contain text (none are scanned images), can I
simply use some command like grep to search for text within the
collection? If so, how would I do this? Can grep read text from
within PDFs?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Since all the PDFs contain text (none are scanned images), can I
simply use some command like grep to search for text within the
collection? If so, how would I do this? Can grep read text from
within PDFs?
pdftotext, comes with the port xpdf I think
Olivier
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Olivier Nicole o...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
Since all the PDFs contain text (none are scanned images), can I
simply use some command like grep to search for text within the
collection? If so, how would I do this? Can grep read text from
within PDFs?
of data I recall seeing
in my literature review.
Which is why I initially suggested collecting the BibTeX (or your
preferred citation management software of choice) entries for your
articles and adding them. I know that when I start collecting articles
for literature reviews, I get a BibTeX copy
2009/5/31 Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:55:15 -0400, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
wrote:
For (my own) clarity sake, won't that take up space in '/'? (Not
arguing, just never thought of using /opt on FreeBSD...)
This depends on your file system layout, Glen. If
For (my own) clarity sake, won't that take up space in '/'? (Not
in my case yes as / is usually my only filesystem. for those who keep
programs (/usr) separate /usr/local2 or /usr/whatever will be OK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
This depends on your file system layout, Glen. If you put
everything into one partition, i. e. /, then everything is
going into /.
like in my case. with one exception - now i usually have /tmp separate but
it's tmpfs :)
other Solarisisms that I've already seen, such as /export
on FreeBSD
On Sun, 31 May 2009 10:30:44 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
does Solaris REQUIRE things to be in /export to be able to export through
NFS or is it just some kind of tradition or routinely repeated rule?
No, just tradition or convention. In most cases,
all your examples are sounds just like kind of tradition.
Just like for eg. creating lots of partitions no matter if it's needed or
not
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 31 May 2009 10:30:44 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
does Solaris
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
other Solarisisms that I've already seen, such as /export
on FreeBSD which is usually used on Solaris for NFS shares.)
does Solaris REQUIRE things to be in /export to be able to export
through NFS or is it just some kind of tradition or routinely repeated
rule?
It's
On Sun, 31 May 2009 10:49:18 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
all your examples are sounds just like kind of tradition.
Just like for eg. creating lots of partitions no matter if it's needed or
not
One exception: The creation of different partitions
In fact, given that FreeBSD doesn't seem to have a native convention on
how exported filesystems are laid out (no mention in hier(7), no default
/etc/exports file), it would make sense to adopt the Solaris/Linux style
where
feasible.
it's best not to adopt any style, but do whatever is
One exception: The creation of different partitions according
to different uses can (but doesn't neccessarily have to) be
useful if partition-wise dumps are required or intended. As
you know, there are advantages and disadvantages. There can
This is only adventage - to use dump.
Anyway - do
On Sun, 31 May 2009 11:19:10 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
For me it never succeeded, even if it dumps successfully produced output
could be unrestorable.
After getting this twice i stayed away from this great (but nonworking)
tool. Backup tool that
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Your idea won't hurt in single-disk, single-partition case, but this
case is prohibited by other blind repeat rule of making lots of
partitions.
I didn't say anything about how file system layout should be mapped to
disk partitions[*]. Nor do I support the concept of
On Sun, 31 May 2009 11:15:19 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
it's best not to adopt any style, but do whatever is optimal in certain
case.
You propose just another example of blind repeated rule.
It is often found as corporate standard. This doesn't mean
I just prefer dump + restore for cloning systems because it
explicitely takes care of file attributes and anything; I do use
You are right, but rsync can do the same :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Your idea won't hurt in single-disk, single-partition case, but this case
is prohibited by other blind repeat rule of making lots of partitions.
I didn't say anything about how file system layout should be mapped to
disk partitions[*]. Nor do I support the concept of making lots and lots of
case.
You propose just another example of blind repeated rule.
It is often found as corporate standard. This doesn't mean you
Well i don't expect many smart people working in big corporations. There
are exceptions of course - those that got there by accident and not yet
left ;)
Been unable to purchase karaoke of rock and roll greats like AC/DC, THE
ROLLING STONES, THE DOORS, LED ZEPPELIN. Looking for advice on software
that will allow me to edit out the singing voice tracks from a mp3 file
and write the resulting music as a avi file so I can have the song words
show
Been unable to purchase karaoke of rock and roll greats like AC/DC, THE
ROLLING STONES, THE DOORS, LED ZEPPELIN. Looking for advice on software that
AFAIK nobody yet invented so good voice analyzer that could separate out
music and speech.
But there are programs that ROUGHLY removes speech
Hi!
I installed my software using csup and make install. Now there are new
versions available. How can i deinstall the old software with
depencies or upgrade the complete stuff? I want to use make for that
and it should ignore if an old version is already installed or
deinstall the old
Hi!
I installed my software using csup and make install. Now there are new
you mean FreeBSD or some add on software?
as assume latter. you should use ports for installing software.
if there are no port for it, you should write it and contribute ;)
but if you already did this way, then you
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:54:10 +0200, Markus Künkler mar...@amobos.org wrote:
Hi!
I installed my software using csup and make install. Now there are new
versions available. How can i deinstall the old software with
depencies or upgrade the complete stuff? I want to use make
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:20:13 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
If you need to install software this was, try to set target directory base
not in /usr, to not make mess with base system, and not /usr/local - to
not mess with ports.
creating /usr/local2
creating /usr/local2 is a good choice
You can even keep it out of /usr employing the /opt Linuxism. :-)
no matter what's the name, but it's good to have
/usr/local for ports-based installed things
/some/other/directory for hand-installed things
so both base system and ports are clearly
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:35:35PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
You can even keep it out of /usr employing the /opt Linuxism. :-)
/opt is actually a Solarism... ;-)
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Sat, 30 May 2009 23:50:42 +0200, cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
/opt is actually a Solarism... ;-)
That's true, but nobody knows, because Solaris doesn't exist. :-)
--
Polytropon
From Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Polytropon,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
You can even keep it out of /usr employing the /opt Linuxism. :-)
For (my own) clarity sake, won't that take up space in '/'? (Not
arguing, just never thought of using /opt on FreeBSD...)
--
Glen Barber
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:55:15 -0400, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
For (my own) clarity sake, won't that take up space in '/'? (Not
arguing, just never thought of using /opt on FreeBSD...)
This depends on your file system layout, Glen. If you put
everything into one partition, i.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:55:15 -0400, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
wrote:
For (my own) clarity sake, won't that take up space in '/'? (Not
arguing, just never thought of using /opt on FreeBSD...)
This depends on your
Gary Gatten wrote:
What about with PAE and/or other extension schemes?
Doesn't help with the KVM requirement, and still only provides a 4GB address
space for any single process.
If it's just memory requirements, can I assume if I don't have a $hit
load of storage and billions of files it
I really don't have any hard data on ZFS performance relative to UFS + geom.
so please test yourself :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
ZFS should work on i386. As far as I know there aren't any killer bugs that
are architecture specific, but I'm no expert. Unless your aim is to learn
unless someone assume than size of pointers are 4 bytes, and write program
in C, there will work as good in 64-bit mode and in 32-bit mode.
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 09:52:42 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
ZFS should work on i386. As far as I know there aren't any killer bugs
that are architecture specific, but I'm no expert. Unless your aim is to
learn
unless someone assume than size of pointers are 4 bytes, and write program
in
in C, there will work as good in 64-bit mode and in 32-bit mode.
Wojciech, I have to ask: are you actually a programmer or are you repeating
yes i am. if you are interested i wrote programs for x86, ARM (ARM7TDMI),
MIPS32 (4Kc), and once for alpha. I have quite good knowledge for ARM and
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 11:40:51 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
you talk about performance or if it work at all?
Both, really. If they have to code up macros to support identical operations
(such as addition) on both platforms, and accidentally forget to use the macro
in some place, then voila:
you talk about performance or if it work at all?
Both, really. If they have to code up macros to support identical operations
OK. talking about performance:
- 64-bit addition/substraction on 32-bit computer: 2 instructions instead
of one (ADD+ADC)
- 64-bit NOT, XOR, AND, OR and
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:52:33AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 11:40:51 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
you talk about performance or if it work at all?
Both, really. If they have to code up macros to support identical
operations (such as addition) on both platforms,
I haven't looked at the ZFS code but this sort of thing is exactly why
all code I write uses int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, uint8_t, ... even when
the first thing I have to do with a new compiler is to work out the
proper typedefs to create them.
int, short and char are portable, only other things
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:24:17PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I haven't looked at the ZFS code but this sort of thing is exactly why
all code I write uses int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, uint8_t, ... even when
the first thing I have to do with a new compiler is to work out the
proper typedefs to
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:24:17PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I haven't looked at the ZFS code but this sort of thing is exactly why
all code I write uses int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, uint8_t, ... even when
the first thing I have to do with a new compiler is to work out the
proper typedefs
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
you are right. you can't be happy of warm house without getting really
cold some time :)
that's why it's excellent that ZFS (and few other things) is included
in FreeBSD but it's COMPLETELY optional.
Well, I switched from the heater that doesn't work and is poorly
Howard Jones wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
you are right. you can't be happy of warm house without getting really
cold some time :)
that's why it's excellent that ZFS (and few other things) is included
in FreeBSD but it's COMPLETELY optional.
Well, I switched from the heater that doesn't
Sweet thanks for the info. Building one of those boxes is next in the list.
On 5/26/09, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Howard Jones wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
you are right. you can't be happy of warm house without getting really
cold some time :)
that's why it's excellent that
On Monday 25 May 2009 08:57:48 am Howard Jones wrote:
I'm was half-considering switching to ZFS, but the most positive thing I
could find written about that (as implemented on FreeBSD) is that it
doesn't crash that much, so perhaps not. That was from a while ago
though.
Wojciech hates it for
Why avoid ZFS on x86?
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Strauser
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:39 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Software RAID
On Monday 25 May 2009 08
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:15:41PM -0500, Gary Gatten wrote:
Why avoid ZFS on x86?
That's because ZFS works best with huge amounts of (Kernel-)RAM, and
i386 32-bit doesn't provide enough adressing space.
Btw, I've tried ZFS on two FreeBSD/amd64 test machines with 8GB and
16GB of RAM, and it
Gary Gatten wrote:
Why avoid ZFS on x86?
Because in order to deal most effectively with disk arrays of 100s or 1000s
of GB as are typical nowadays, ZFS requires more than the 4GB of addressable
RAM[*] that the i386 arch can provide.
You can make ZFS work on i386, but it requires very careful
?
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Gary Gatten
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Software RAID
Gary Gatten wrote:
Why avoid ZFS on x86
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 01:44:51 pm Gary Gatten wrote:
What about with PAE and/or other extension schemes?
If it's just memory requirements, can I assume if I don't have a $hit
load of storage and billions of files it will work ok with 4GB of RAM?
I guess I'm just making sure there isn't some
Wojciech hates it for some reason, but I wouldn't let that deter you. I'm
same == incredibly low performance.
of course having overmuscled CPU not much used for anything else - it may
not be a problem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
10-4, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Strauser
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:00 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Software RAID
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 01:44:51 pm
- Filesystem sizes are dynamic. They all grow and shrink inside the
same
pool, so you don't have to worry about making one too large or too
small.
there are actually almost no filesystems, just one filesystem with many
upper descriptors and separate per filesystem quota.
just to make happy
You can make ZFS work on i386, but it requires very careful tuning and is not
going to work brilliantly well for particularly large or high-throughput
filesystems.
you mean high transfer like reading/writing huge files. anyway not
faster than properly configured UFS+maybe gstripe/gmirror.
ZFS is thoroughly 64-bit and uses 64-bit math pervasively. That means
you
have to emulate all those operations with 2 32-bit values, and on the
register-starved x86 platform you end up with absolutely horrible
performance.
no this difference isn't that great. it doesn't use much less CPU on
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
You can make ZFS work on i386, but it requires very careful tuning and
is not
going to work brilliantly well for particularly large or high-throughput
filesystems.
you mean high transfer like reading/writing huge files. anyway not
faster than properly configured
Hi,
Can anyone with experience of software RAID point me in the right
direction please? I've used gmirror before with no trouble, but nothing
fancier.
I have a set of brand new 1TB drives, a Sil3124 SATA card and a FreeBSD
7.1-p4 system.
I created a RAID 5 set with gvinum:
drive d0 device /dev
of software RAID point me in the right
direction please? I've used gmirror before with no trouble, but nothing
fancier.
I have a set of brand new 1TB drives, a Sil3124 SATA card and a FreeBSD
7.1-p4 system.
I created a RAID 5 set with gvinum:
drive d0 device /dev/ad4s1a
drive d1 device /dev
-Original Message-
From: Howard Jones [mailto:howard.jo...@network-i.net]
Sent: 25 May 2009 14:58
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD Software RAID
Hi,
Can anyone with experience of software RAID point me in the right
direction please? I've used gmirror before
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.ukwrote:
-Original Message-
From: Howard Jones [mailto:howard.jo...@network-i.net]
Sent: 25 May 2009 14:58
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD Software RAID
Hi,
Can anyone with experience
i use gmirror but once i tried gvinum and it doesn't work well.
i think simply use mirroring. ZFS will introduce 100 times more problems
than it solves
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 07:37:59PM +0300, Valentin Bud wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Graeme Dargie
a...@tangerine-army.co.ukwrote:
Can anyone with experience of software RAID point me in the right
direction please? I've used gmirror before with no trouble, but nothing
fancier
I have looked at ZFS recently. Appears to be a memory hog, needs about 1
GB especially if large file transfers may occur over gigabit ethernet
while it CAN be set up on 256MB machine with a little big flags in
loader.conf (should be autotuned anyway) - it generally takes as much
memory as it's
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl]
Sent: 25 May 2009 18:09
To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Howard Jones; Graeme Dargie; Valentin Bud
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Software RAID
I have looked at ZFS recently. Appears to be a memory hog
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 07:09:15PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I have looked at ZFS recently. Appears to be a memory hog, needs
about 1 GB especially if large file transfers may occur over gigabit
ethernet
while it CAN be set up on 256MB machine with a little big flags in
loader.conf
Ok granted this is a server sat in my house and it is not a mission
critical server in a large business, personally I have can live with ZFS
taking a bit longer vs resilience.
simply gmirror and UFS gives the same. much simpler, much faster.
but of course lots of people like to make their life
It makes a certain degree of sense. Sometimes things have to be done
wrong for us to realize how good we had it before. How would we know how
great FreeBSD is if we didn't have Linux? I had to look at ZFS to decide
not to use it when I rebuild my storage this week due to a failing
drive.
you
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl]
Sent: 25 May 2009 18:54
To: Graeme Dargie
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org; Howard Jones; Valentin Bud
Subject: RE: FreeBSD Software RAID
Ok granted this is a server sat in my house
but of course lots of people like to make their life harder
No I am not making life harder at all ... I have 6x500gb hard disks I
want in a good solid raid 5 type configuration. So you are somewhat wide
of the mark in your assumptions.
that's a reason. just don't forget that RAID-z is MUCH
This Week's Featured Technical Whitepapers and Resources:
** IDC Technical Brief: Next-Generation Management Software for Blade
Environments
Sponsored by HP
http://nl.internet.com/ct.html?rtr=ons=1,4jxs,1,fq2q,hyzu,diyr,1w0d
** Whitepaper: Five Basic Steps for Efficient Space Organization
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
thinking that a software raid5 solution may not be such a bad idea.
software raid5 isn't any more bad than hardware raid5 most cases.
just raid5 is bad if you use it in ANY type of load except:
a) mostly
can justify the performance. This is also an addition of yet
another piece of hardware that can fail.
The machine is using a Q6600 processor with 8 GB of memory, so I'm
thinking that a software raid5 solution may not be such a bad idea.
The question is what port multiplier hardware does FreeBSD 7
thinking that a software raid5 solution may not be such a bad idea.
software raid5 isn't any more bad than hardware raid5 most cases.
just raid5 is bad if you use it in ANY type of load except:
a) mostly reads - then set LARGE RAID stripe size
b) mostly huge files - then set small RAID stripe
Hello,
Do you know any decent provider-like software which would handle adding
new domains, ftp accounts, sql databases mail accounts to the server?
Preferably something in ports but I am not sure if there is any such
thing? I am not going to become a provider :) but I am just looking
100$ a month - if you will
be lucky.
Do you know any decent provider-like software which would handle adding new
domains, ftp accounts, sql databases mail accounts to the server?
Preferably something in ports but I am not sure if there is any such thing? I
am not going to become a provider
ISPCP, sysCP, DTC
GNUPanelhttp://gnupanel.org/
OpenPanel http://www.openpanel.com/
ispCP Omega http://isp-control.net/
RavenCore http://www.ravencore.com/
2009/4/15 Zbigniew Szalbot z.szal...@lcwords.com
Hello,
Do you know any decent provider-like software which would handle adding
Hi,
Dnia 15-04-2009 o 13:58:04 Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl napisał(a):
just another man that wants to get everything not just for free, but not
even without much knowledge.
Hmm... who says I want to get everyting for free (without trying and
learning)? Have you read my
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
just another man that wants to get everything not just for free, but not
even without much knowledge.
learn and MAKE IT YOURSELF, that it will fit exactly to your needs.
Or - provide services for
the framework.
A private portstree (as in: uses the ports framework for compiling and
installing software, including registering the port in /var/db/pkg) is best
kept in /usr/ports/local. One needs to set VALID_CATEGORIES=local in
/etc/make.conf and optionally add SUBDIR+=local in /usr/ports
301 - 400 of 1270 matches
Mail list logo
