On 11/13/12 14:21, Arthur Chance wrote:
Oops, sent this off too quickly.
I wrote that. It's only relevant if you have recent disks with 4k
hardware blocks. If you have, you ought to use 4k/16k filesystems
whatever your OS rev.
That should be 4k/32k. As "man newfs" says:
The optimal block:fra
On 11/13/12 13:00, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I just read in another post about disklayout
_
According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your
partitions/slices are 4k al
Leslie Jensen wrote:
I just read in another post about disklayout
_
According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your
partitions/slices are 4k aligned everything S
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:00:15 +0100
Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I just read in another post about disklayout
> _
> According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
> and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided y
I just read in another post about disklayout
_
According to the manual as of 9.0-RELEASE the default fragment
and block sizes for newfs are 4k and 32k, so provided your
partitions/slices are 4k aligned everything Should Just Work.
Befo
