On 01/04/05 08:59 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt sat at the `puter and typed:
>
> >
>
> The only problem with doing this is that you have to completely
> receive the e-mail message before SA can check it against the
> blacklists.
>
> We do the blacklist checks at the MTA level and turn them off in SA.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Louis LeBlanc
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:09 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy...
>
>
> On 01/04/05 05:17 PM, Matthi
On 01/04/05 05:17 PM, Matthias Buelow sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > Use with care. Some spam rbls are overly zealous, and often block out
> > whole netblocks just because one IP has been reported as an offender.
>
> And all dialup networks. Which can lead to the biza
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Use with care. Some spam rbls are overly zealous, and often block out
whole netblocks just because one IP has been reported as an offender.
And all dialup networks. Which can lead to the bizarre situation that
if you're relaying through your mail server from a dialup IP, and
On 01/03/05 08:34 PM, Martin Hepworth sat at the `puter and typed:
> Eric
>
> you'll prob need to retrain the bayes filters ( or a good starter at
> www.fsl.com/support).
>
> also alot of rules from the www.rulesemporium.com/rules.html can be useful.
I believe that's actually www.rulesemporium.c
Eric
you'll prob need to retrain the bayes filters ( or a good starter at
www.fsl.com/support).
also alot of rules from the www.rulesemporium.com/rules.html can be useful.
Might want to look at some of the RBL.s and esp the URI rbl provided
by surbl.org and built into SA3.x
Could ask on the sa-
Hello list,
I recently had to rebuild my server (bad surge protector, all hardware
died). I've reinstalled spamass-milter from ports, but I don't
remember what I put in my old local.cf file for it to work so well
before. I've pretty much got the base config file. Can some of you
share your l
