Well, between using vidcontrol and watch, (neither i had ever used
before) i managed to pull the window, and than like a fool
i control - C'd it dooh!
well, at least now I can start it in screen
- thanks
--
Dan Sikorsky
*Systems Admin/GoldMine Admin*
RegionalHelpWanted.com,Inc. Cupid.com,
On 2006/11/29 9:42, Dan Sikorsky seems to have typed:
Well, between using vidcontrol and watch, (neither i had ever used
before) i managed to pull the window, and than like a fool
i control - C'd it dooh!
well, at least now I can start it in screen
You might want to familiarize yourself
There are so many different types of UNIX. If freeBSD is so great why won't
natural selection begin and let some of these Unix flavors die?
Really, wouldn't it be a better world if we had just a couple open source
OS?
I've been doing some background reading and correct me if I'm wrong. But I
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Grant Cooper wrote:
There are so many different types of UNIX. If freeBSD is so great why won't
natural selection begin and let some of these Unix flavors die?
Really, wouldn't it be a better world if we had just a couple open source
OS?
Why ?
Cliff writes:
Ok, 20 flavours of Linux and at least 3 of
*BSD; well...that's the way it goes...
Actually, it's not the number of versions that exist that is important, it's
the degree of similarity among them. Twenty operating systems that are 98%
compatible is much less of a problem than two
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:48:44AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Grant Cooper wrote:
There are so many different types of UNIX. If freeBSD is so great why won't
natural selection begin and let some of these Unix flavors die?
Really, wouldn't it
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Kinkade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Thanks guys
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:48:44AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Grant Cooper wrote
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:07:23PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
I doubt that. Open source is written by volunteers who still have to have
day jobs. If all software was open source, there'd be no jobs to support
the volunteers writing open source, and so open source would destroy
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:49:52PM +0100, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
Grant Cooper wrote:
I've been doing some background reading and correct me if I'm wrong. But I
came across of at least 30 active different open source and commercial Unix
flavors (and I'm sure that's a drop in the
Erik writes:
Have you read any of the license agreements normally
accompanying commercial software? The big companies
generally don't guarantee a bloody thing about the
software, least of all that it will work correctly.
Yes, they do, and generally they will support what they sell. If they
I don't think that FreeBSD-Questions is the forum for this discussion.
- Michael Hogsett
Erik writes:
Have you read any of the license agreements normally
accompanying commercial software? The big companies
generally don't guarantee a bloody thing about the
software, least of all
11 matches
Mail list logo