SCREEN resolved, thanks guys

2006-11-29 Thread Dan Sikorsky
Well, between using vidcontrol and watch, (neither i had ever used before) i managed to pull the window, and than like a fool i control - C'd it dooh! well, at least now I can start it in screen - thanks -- Dan Sikorsky *Systems Admin/GoldMine Admin* RegionalHelpWanted.com,Inc. Cupid.com,

Re: SCREEN resolved, thanks guys

2006-11-29 Thread Peter A. Giessel
On 2006/11/29 9:42, Dan Sikorsky seems to have typed: Well, between using vidcontrol and watch, (neither i had ever used before) i managed to pull the window, and than like a fool i control - C'd it dooh! well, at least now I can start it in screen You might want to familiarize yourself

Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Grant Cooper
There are so many different types of UNIX. If freeBSD is so great why won't natural selection begin and let some of these Unix flavors die? Really, wouldn't it be a better world if we had just a couple open source OS? I've been doing some background reading and correct me if I'm wrong. But I

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Grant Cooper wrote: There are so many different types of UNIX. If freeBSD is so great why won't natural selection begin and let some of these Unix flavors die? Really, wouldn't it be a better world if we had just a couple open source OS? Why ?

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Cliff writes: Ok, 20 flavours of Linux and at least 3 of *BSD; well...that's the way it goes... Actually, it's not the number of versions that exist that is important, it's the degree of similarity among them. Twenty operating systems that are 98% compatible is much less of a problem than two

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:48:44AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Grant Cooper wrote: There are so many different types of UNIX. If freeBSD is so great why won't natural selection begin and let some of these Unix flavors die? Really, wouldn't it

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
- Original Message - From: Nathan Kinkade [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Thanks guys On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:48:44AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Grant Cooper wrote

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:07:23PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: I doubt that. Open source is written by volunteers who still have to have day jobs. If all software was open source, there'd be no jobs to support the volunteers writing open source, and so open source would destroy

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:49:52PM +0100, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: Grant Cooper wrote: I've been doing some background reading and correct me if I'm wrong. But I came across of at least 30 active different open source and commercial Unix flavors (and I'm sure that's a drop in the

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Erik writes: Have you read any of the license agreements normally accompanying commercial software? The big companies generally don't guarantee a bloody thing about the software, least of all that it will work correctly. Yes, they do, and generally they will support what they sell. If they

Re: Thanks guys

2002-11-13 Thread Mike Hogsett
I don't think that FreeBSD-Questions is the forum for this discussion. - Michael Hogsett Erik writes: Have you read any of the license agreements normally accompanying commercial software? The big companies generally don't guarantee a bloody thing about the software, least of all