The section in the Handbook presents a solution for a scenario in which
all machines in a build set are more less identical, or sufficiently
generic enough that each machine's make.conf is the same, the exception
being the build machine's own make.conf (which can specify that multiple
kernels are b
On Thursday 16 November 2006 20:48, George Allan wrote:
> The section in the Handbook presents a solution for a scenario in which
> all machines in a build set are more less identical, or sufficiently
> generic enough that each machine's make.conf is the same, the exception
> being the build machin
Hi all.
I recently acquired a laptop whose world and kernel I'd like to have
built by a different machine on my LAN. Chapter 21.5 of the current
Handbook lays things out pretty well, but I do have a couple of questions
before proceeding.
The Handbook states: "Finally[,] make sure that /etc/make.c
Hi D J Hawkey Jr,
you wrote.
DJHJ> So, two machines use the same world, except that a laptop doesn't want
DJHJ> profiled libraries or games. Since the install is separate from the build,
DJHJ> the build machine's make.conf must _not_ define NOPROFILE nor NOGAMES,
If that machine itself wants those
On Feb 21, at 05:56 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
>
> DJHJ> Second, two machines are of the same architecture, but they have different
> DJHJ> CPUs: One is an Intel PIII, but the other is a PII. Will the world built
> DJHJ> on a PIII be correct for a PII? Similarly, will the kernel for the PII
> DJHJ
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> On Feb 21, at 05:56 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> >
> > DJHJ> Second, two machines are of the same architecture, but they have different
> > DJHJ> CPUs: One is an Intel PIII, but the other is a PII. Will the world built
> > DJHJ>
On Feb 23, at 01:05 AM, Tony Frank wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > On Feb 21, at 05:56 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> > >
> > > DJHJ> Second, two machines are of the same architecture, but they have different
> > > DJHJ> CPUs: One is an Intel PIII, but
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:07:23AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> On Feb 23, at 01:05 AM, Tony Frank wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > > On Feb 21, at 05:56 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > DJHJ> Second, two machines are of the same ar
OK, I've cross-posted this message to -hackers, to see if we can get
some sort of definitive [to me] answer. Please forgive if it's considered
bad form.
-hackers: There is a thread in -questions in response to my query as
to building the world and kernels for a variety of Intel CPUs on one
machine
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: True or False: Setting CPUTYPE to the lowest target CPU ("p2") in
: a build machine's make.conf will cripple the performance of target
: machines with higher CPUs ("p3", "p4", "i586", "i686", etc.).
False. It
On Feb 23, at 09:12 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : True or False: Setting CPUTYPE to the lowest target CPU ("p2") in
> : a build machine's make.conf will cripple the performance of target
> : machines with h
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:46:07AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> On Feb 23, at 09:12 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : True or False: Setting CPUTYPE to the lowest target CPU ("p2") in
> > : a buil
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tony Frank wrote:
[snip]
TF> > > : If "True", for optimized code across all machines, the code should
TF> > > : just be built on each machine, right?
TF> > > That would give slightly better performance. However, it can be more
TF> > > pain than it is worth if the number of m
13 matches
Mail list logo