Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-25 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 12:19 PM 10.25.2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 09:47 AM 10.25.2002 -0700, Linh Pham wrote: >>On 2002-10-23, Kevin Stevens scribbled: >> >># However, it *is* correct that all devices on a UDMA channel must support >># UDMA, so yes, the above is a problem. I don't recall if all devices must >># also b

Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-25 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 09:47 AM 10.25.2002 -0700, Linh Pham wrote: >On 2002-10-23, Kevin Stevens scribbled: > ># However, it *is* correct that all devices on a UDMA channel must support ># UDMA, so yes, the above is a problem. I don't recall if all devices must ># also be the same UDMA speed (66/100/133) or not, bbel

Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-25 Thread Linh Pham
On 2002-10-23, lewiz scribbled: # Afaik, UDMA100 is only supported if there is just one device on the # channel. Feel free to shoot me if I am incorrect, which is quite # possible. Just double-check by asking Google or something - but I have # a gut feeling this may be the case. You should be

Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-25 Thread Linh Pham
On 2002-10-23, Kevin Stevens scribbled: # However, it *is* correct that all devices on a UDMA channel must support # UDMA, so yes, the above is a problem. I don't recall if all devices must # also be the same UDMA speed (66/100/133) or not, bbelieve that is true # too. This is not a BSD issue, i

Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-23 Thread Kevin Stevens
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jack L. Stone wrote: > At 11:04 PM 10.23.2002 +0100, lewiz wrote: > >Hi, > > > > Afaik, UDMA100 is only supported if there is just one device on the > >channel. Feel free to shoot me if I am incorrect, which is quite > >possible. Just double-check by asking Google or someth

Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-23 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 11:04 PM 10.23.2002 +0100, lewiz wrote: >Hi, > > Afaik, UDMA100 is only supported if there is just one device on the >channel. Feel free to shoot me if I am incorrect, which is quite >possible. Just double-check by asking Google or something - but I have >a gut feeling this may be the case. >

Re: UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-23 Thread lewiz
Hi, Afaik, UDMA100 is only supported if there is just one device on the channel. Feel free to shoot me if I am incorrect, which is quite possible. Just double-check by asking Google or something - but I have a gut feeling this may be the case. -lewiz. On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:38:00PM -0700

UDMA limited to 33 - resolution

2002-10-23 Thread Steve Warwick
Hi, Thanks to all of you that answered my call for help. Problem: dmesg / boot reported bus limited to UDMA33. Results: - CD-Rom was causing the problem. Once taken off the bus, UDMA100 was recognized. - Added a UDMA66 HD in place of the CD and the bus was limited to UDMA33 - Swapped the pla