At 02:54 22/10/2011, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:32:47 +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
As far as i know, the libxul port is inside ff3. Installing libxul
doesn't install ff3, only libxul. Perhaps it's an old libxul and the
newr one is inside ff7, so libxul port should point there, don't know that.
I'm not sure if it
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:11 +0200
Polytropon articulated:
I'm not sure if it still applies, but in earlier Firefox
version transitions (and the consideration of dependencies)
some programs depending on libxul would install an outdated
Firefox version. The solution has been WITH_GECKO=libxul
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:28:40PM +0200, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote:
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem?
2) is
