In response to "Daniel Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > We have some systems with a lot of jails. We're using ezjail, which
> results
> > in a lot of nullfs mounts. In combination with some other nullfs
> tricks I'm
> > using on this system, I'm a bit concerned that we'r
Bill Moran wrote:
> We have some systems with a lot of jails. We're using ezjail, which
results
> in a lot of nullfs mounts. In combination with some other nullfs
tricks I'm
> using on this system, I'm a bit concerned that we're going to hit some
sort
> of limit on the number of mountpoint.
>
>
We have some systems with a lot of jails. We're using ezjail, which results
in a lot of nullfs mounts. In combination with some other nullfs tricks I'm
using on this system, I'm a bit concerned that we're going to hit some sort
of limit on the number of mountpoint.
Google hasn't been much help,
