What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
TIA
--
Eric F Crist
AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc
(612) 998-3588
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
At 09:25 AM 1/19/2004, Eric F Crist wrote:
What do people here use to edit HTML documents?
I've always used a text editor -- textpad on windows -- because working
with html templates as a developer this is imho by far the best option.
I usually use Dreamweaver, but I haven't gotten the time to tr
>
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
>
I usually use vi.
But, generally, the consultants here recommend Dreamweaver.
jerry
> but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
> Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
> TIA
>
> Eric F Crist
I just use Dreamweaver (or whatever software is available) on Windows and
post the files to my FreeBSD servers.
Tom Veldhouse
- Original Message -
From: "Eric F Crist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 8:25 AM
Subject: Web Ed
Eric F Crist wrote:
What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
TIA
For a fully graphical html development tool, try /usr/ports/www/quanta
PWR.
_
At 2004-01-19T14:25:28Z, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents?
Emacs.
--
Kirk Strauser
"94 outdated ports on the box,
94 outdated ports.
Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
82 outdated ports on the box."
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP sig
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 07:25, Eric F Crist wrote:
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
> but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
> Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
> TIA
I use the Bluefish gtk2 web editor almost everyday (www/bluefish-
On Monday 19 January 2004 16:24, Peter Risdon wrote:
> Eric F Crist wrote:
> >What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use
> > Dreamweaver, but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so
> > I can run Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
> >TIA
>
> For a fully graphical html deve
On Monday 19 January 2004 14:25, Eric F Crist wrote:
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
> but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
> Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
> TIA
I like bluefish very much. I heard wml is better, but I haven't
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Web Editing?
On Monday 19 January 2004 14:25, Eric F Crist wrote:
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use
Dreamweaver,
> but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can
run
> Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
long tags.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniela
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Web Editing?
>
> On Monday 19 January 2004 14:25, Eric F Crist w
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 14:03, fbsd_user wrote:
> Are all the html editors people have been talking about in this
> thread run on the X desktop?
> Do any of then work without X, just from the command line?
Yes, Emacs will run with or without XFree86.
James
___
On Monday, 19 January 2004 at 8:25:28 -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
> but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
> Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
Is Dreamweaver output s
> On Monday, 19 January 2004 at 8:25:28 -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use
>> Dreamweaver, but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working
>> so I can run Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
>
> Is Dreamweave
At 2004-01-19T22:59:05Z, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think Macromedia have soughted that all out by now in MX. Frankly i
> havent found an editor for Unix that is as good as either Quanta or Zend
> Studio or even Eclipse.
The website at your email domain doesn't validate as any level of HTML.
> At 2004-01-19T22:59:05Z, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I think Macromedia have soughted that all out by now in MX. Frankly i
>> havent found an editor for Unix that is as good as either Quanta or
>> Zend Studio or even Eclipse.
>
> The website at your email domain doesn't validate as any level
On Tuesday, 20 January 2004 at 10:35:14 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> At 2004-01-19T22:59:05Z, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I think Macromedia have soughted that all out by now in MX. Frankly i
>>> havent found an editor for Unix that is as good as either Quanta or
>>> Zend Studio or eve
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver,
> but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run
> Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
Quanta is your best bet. It's very similar to Homesite on Windows. (Which I think is
bundled with Dreamweaver these
> Quanta is your best bet. It's very similar to Homesite on Windows.
> (Which I think is bundled with Dreamweaver these days.)
>
> HOMEPAGE: http://quanta.sourceforge.net/
>
> Those of you who haven't looked at it in a long time, check it out
> again. Tag-completion for HTML saves many keystroke
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:54:35AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2004-01-19T14:25:28Z, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What do people here use to edit HTML documents?
>
> Emacs.
Are you using PSGML's xml-mode? I find it's not indenting my XHTML
documents too well (for example,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:35:14AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i seriouslly cant understand how people can develop via a terminal
> especially for speed and efficiency when edit, moving , selecting
> etc. .
I don't really find anything speedy or efficient about the 'click,
drag, select, men
At 2004-01-20T05:45:32Z, "Paul A. Hoadley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you using PSGML's xml-mode? I find it's not indenting my XHTML
> documents too well (for example, it seems to assume something like 'div'
> is an inline rather than a block level element, and then won't indent the
> clos
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> That's your call. A number of us have good reasons, and that's why many
> of us use "bollox".
i'm presuming this is an editor of sorts ? :)
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED](0
On Wednesday, 21 January 2004 at 2:39:58 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> That's your call. A number of us have good reasons, and that's why many
>> of us use "bollox".
>
> i'm presuming this is an editor of sorts ? :)
It appears to be a combinat
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 January 2004 at 2:39:58 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >
> >> That's your call. A number of us have good reasons, and that's why many
> >> of us use "bollox".
> >
> > i'm pres
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Eric F Crist thusly...
>
Content-Description: signed data
> What do people here use to edit HTML documents?
Vim. Lacking that any other modern vi-like software; lacking that
non-emacs software (but not pine); lacking that emacs ...
- Parv
--
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 05:57 pm, parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Eric F Crist thusly...
>
> Content-Description: signed data
>
> > What do people here use to edit HTML documents?
>
> Vim. Lacking that any other modern vi-li
27 matches
Mail list logo
