In the last episode (Jan 01), Kirk Strauser said:
> I'm staring at "top" running on my 6.0-STABLE system. It's my
> desktop machine, and also serves a light web/mail load (including a
> few jails). Basically, the system should be idle about 99% of the
> time when I'm not actively doing something o
On Sunday 01 January 2006 06:29 pm, Chris wrote:
> Where is the line that reflects CPU states?
> This is very misleading without the WHOLE paste.
My version of top doesn't display the CPU state line when in batch mode.
$ top -S -n 5
last pid: 98339; load averages: 1.29, 1.62, 1.62 up 29+03:
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2006 03:19 pm, Chris wrote:
>
>
>>Try this:
>>
>>top -S -n 50
>
>
> Here it is. Note that the WCPU fields don't come anywhere near adding up
> to the "missing" 42% (100 - ~58%). Also, the change in "last pid" is only
> about 13000 over the course of
On Sunday 01 January 2006 03:19 pm, Chris wrote:
> Try this:
>
> top -S -n 50
Here it is. Note that the WCPU fields don't come anywhere near adding up
to the "missing" 42% (100 - ~58%). Also, the change in "last pid" is only
about 13000 over the course of 11000 seconds, and that included a Goog
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I'm staring at "top" running on my 6.0-STABLE system. It's my desktop
> machine, and also serves a light web/mail load (including a few jails).
> Basically, the system should be idle about 99% of the time when I'm not
> actively doing something on it. And yet it's not.
>
>
I'm staring at "top" running on my 6.0-STABLE system. It's my desktop
machine, and also serves a light web/mail load (including a few jails).
Basically, the system should be idle about 99% of the time when I'm not
actively doing something on it. And yet it's not.
The CPU never gets above about 7
