C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Michael Powell
> wrote:
>> I think this matters more to third party ports software builds than it
>> does the system. I thought that large pieces of the kernel were designed
>> to not make much, if any, use the various SIMD extensions. Maybe t
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> I think this matters more to third party ports software builds than it does
> the system. I thought that large pieces of the kernel were designed to not
> make much, if any, use the various SIMD extensions. Maybe this has changed
> and I'm b
Mike Clarke wrote:
>
> I have a AMD Athlon 4850e which is described as "Athlon 64 X2"
> Dual-Core" processor.
>
> /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf lists recognised CPU types, but which
> of athlon64, athlon-mp or athlon-xp is the most appropriate for this
> CPU? I've been using "athlon64" so fa
I deal with AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Windsor (AM2, L2 2048Kb) and wondering of
it's CPUTYPE too.
2010/4/24 Mike Clarke
>
> I have a AMD Athlon 4850e which is described as "Athlon 64 X2"
> Dual-Core" processor.
>
> /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf lists recognised CPU types, but which
> of athlon
I have a AMD Athlon 4850e which is described as "Athlon 64 X2"
Dual-Core" processor.
/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf lists recognised CPU types, but which
of athlon64, athlon-mp or athlon-xp is the most appropriate for this
CPU? I've been using "athlon64" so far without any problems but I do
