Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-20 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Joerg Pernfuss wrote: /bin/sh is actually an ash. Minimal POSIX sh with a few additions that don't help it anyway near a friendly shell for interactive use. With set -o emacs or set -o vi, and the existence of job control, sh is a perfectly adequate *root* shell, IMHO - though I'm a csh

Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Martin McCormick
Is there any particular reason why FreeBSD has csh as the default root shell? Nothing really wrong with it except that I quit using csh about twelve years ago and so am a little rusty about the finer details when I come across a csh shell. On a number of FreeBSD4.x systems, I used chsh

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Jonathan Arnold
Martin McCormick wrote: Is there any particular reason why FreeBSD has csh as the default root shell? Nothing really wrong with it except that I The stock answer is that bash is not guaranteed to be available, as it is neither in the standard installation package, nor is it on the /

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread RW
On Thursday 19 October 2006 14:03, Martin McCormick wrote: Is there any particular reason why FreeBSD has csh as the default root shell? Nothing really wrong with it except that I quit using csh about twelve years ago and so am a little rusty about the finer details when I come across a

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:03:02AM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote: Is there any particular reason why FreeBSD has csh as the default root shell? Nothing really wrong with it except that I quit using csh about twelve years ago and so am a little rusty about the finer details when I come

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:20:14AM -0400, Jonathan Arnold wrote: Martin McCormick wrote: Is there any particular reason why FreeBSD has csh as the default root shell? Nothing really wrong with it except that I The stock answer is that bash is not guaranteed to be available, as it is

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Martin McCormick
RW writes: There is an alternative uid 0 user called toor which you can use if you want to use bash as root. OTOH hand there is a school of thought that you shouldn't be too comfortable as root. My thanks to all. On all the systems in question, bash ends up on the same partition as

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Martin McCormick wrote: One thing I was trying to accomplish is to have a bell in the root prompt. In the .cshrc file is a string set prompt=\007\!# I have also tried replacing the \007 with the actual Control-G and even a \a. All produce an attempt to render a bell but

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-19 11:48, Martin McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RW writes: There is an alternative uid 0 user called toor which you can use if you want to use bash as root. OTOH hand there is a school of thought that you shouldn't be too comfortable as root. My thanks to all. On

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Martin McCormick
Alex Zbyslaw writes: set prompt=hello%{^G%}there where ^G is a single control char, not two chars. Thanks. It works perfectly. I am reading the man for tcsh again to attempt to figure out what I missed the first time. ___

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-10-19 15:30, Martin McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex Zbyslaw writes: set prompt=hello%{^G%}there where ^G is a single control char, not two chars. Thanks. It works perfectly. I am reading the man for tcsh again to attempt to figure out what I missed the first

Re: Why csh on Root?

2006-10-19 Thread Joerg Pernfuss
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:03:02 -0500 Martin McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any particular reason why FreeBSD has csh as the default root shell? Nothing really wrong with it except that I quit using csh about twelve years ago and so am a little rusty about the finer details