On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Thanks for all the ideas about where to download/install custom apps -
the one that appeals most at this stage is a jail, partly because I have
never played with them, and I think I should progress my learning in
that direction. However I find the other a
--On March 29, 2009 11:03:03 AM -0500 Barnaby Scott
wrote:
Many thanks to all who have helped on this one.
I managed to get wine installed without X and it works :) However my
application doesn't :(
Most of the errors are concerned with MS Visual C++ libraries, which I
have unconfirmed indica
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Saturday 28 March 2009 13:06:44 Robert Huff wrote:
Mel Flynn writes:
> Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
> can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
> for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
Most s
2009/3/28 Robert Huff :
>
> Mel Flynn writes:
>
>> > Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
>> > can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
>> > for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
>>
>> Most systems I use or inherited use a
On Saturday 28 March 2009 13:06:44 Robert Huff wrote:
> Mel Flynn writes:
> > > Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
> > > can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
> > > for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
> >
> > Most s
Mel Flynn writes:
> > Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I
> > can find no answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible
> > for one reason oranother, place to download application source to?
>
> Most systems I use or inherited use a variation of ~/src ~/cvs or
>
On Friday 27 March 2009 15:42:27 Barnaby Scott wrote:
> Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
> answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason or
> another, place to download application source to?
Most systems I use or inherited use a variation o
--On Friday, March 27, 2009 09:42:27 -0500 Barnaby Scott
wrote:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason or
another, place to download application source to? Presumably you don't
want it mixed up in
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one reason or another,
place to download application source to? Presumably you don't want it mixed
Not dumb at all. There are
rendering binary to run is an exercise for you. :-)
I left wine without x installed on my system. If you have questions, I
*may* be able to help.
Can I ask one more possibly really dumb question, to which I can find no
answer: Is there a 'conventional', or sensible for one
ent, whose
> controller is inextricably Windows-based... you get the picture!)
>
> In answer to the other replies (thanks to you guys too):
>
> Yes, wine is fine with just the command prompt. It is somewhat confusing
> in that it offers a thing called wineconsole, but ironically
fusing
in that it offers a thing called wineconsole, but ironically that *does*
appear to require X. Just using wine without X is fine, so long as the
app does not attempt to open any sort of window, system tray etc.
As for the 'cluttering' - I'm not so worried about disk space, that'
equires
Windows libraries or the kernel, but does not use the gui.
that's possible. anyway - if you can't build wine without X, built it with
X, it will only install X libraries nothing else and it will work when
command line utils will be used.
endering work to
keep them from getting bored, but I don't want X cluttering them up.)
Any help gratefully received
Number 1, you should always google first. There's a wealth of posts on the web
about running wine without X.
Note that, at present, the wine port will not work. (The
our CNC equipment, whose
controller is inextricably Windows-based... you get the picture!)
In answer to the other replies (thanks to you guys too):
Yes, wine is fine with just the command prompt. It is somewhat confusing
in that it offers a thing called wineconsole, but ironically that *does*
appear to
no response.
I want to install wine, but without X on the system. Obviously trying to do
what you want to do with wine not having X?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
2009/3/26 Robert Huff :
>
> Bill Moran writes:
>
>> > I want to install wine, but without X on the system.
>>
>> Why would you expect this to be possible? The GUI is an integral
>> part of MS Windows ... I can't imagine how wine would work at all
>> without X installed -- which is probably why
Bill Moran writes:
> > I want to install wine, but without X on the system.
>
> Why would you expect this to be possible? The GUI is an integral
> part of MS Windows ... I can't imagine how wine would work at all
> without X installed -- which is probably why you're not getting
> any answ
In response to Barnaby Scott :
> I'm sorry if I'm asking in the wrong place, but I have tried elsewhere
> and go no response.
>
> I want to install wine, but without X on the system.
Why would you expect this to be possible? The GUI is an integral part
of MS Windows ... I can't imagine how win
I'm sorry if I'm asking in the wrong place, but I have tried elsewhere
and go no response.
I want to install wine, but without X on the system. Obviously trying to
do this from ports drags in loads of X-related stuff. There doesn't seem
to be a WITHOUT_X11 knob available for the wine port (pre
20 matches
Mail list logo
