Vulpes Velox wrote:
Xorg beat XFree86 out in regards of features in the newest release.
And in regards of bugs. I've never seen so many random BadWindow errors
when doing remote X than I have with X.org. Not even old DEC and HP R5
servers were so bugged. But of course stability is for bean
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody could provide me with a brief explanation of
why FreeBSD has made Xorg the default X11 implementation over XFree86.
It doesn't really matter to me, I've tried it, it seems to work fine,
and almost exactly the same.
The only problem I've run into so far is is
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:54:13AM -0500, Duane Winner wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody could provide me with a brief explanation of
why FreeBSD has made Xorg the default X11 implementation over XFree86.
It doesn't really matter to me, I've tried it, it seems to work fine,
and
organization, and since we're in the process of
moving from 5.2.1 to 5.3, it would be nice to have a little mention
of why we're going to Xorg after my entire section for installing X
is going to change from Xfree86 instructions.
Xorg beat XFree86 out in regards of features in the newest
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:57:21PM -0500, Doug Van Allen wrote:
I'm going to install 5.3, but I now understand that sysinstall does
not handle in install of XServer. It is a post-install duty. I don't
know which is the better one to install-Xorg or XFree86?? Reading
some vague posts about
On 11/22/04 05:57 PM, Doug Van Allen sat at the `puter and typed:
I'm going to install 5.3, but I now understand that sysinstall does
not handle in install of XServer. It is a post-install duty. I don't
know which is the better one to install-Xorg or XFree86?? Reading
some vague posts about
On Aug 18, 2004, at 9:28 PM, Eric Crist wrote:
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle? If so, what are those advantages?
On a new machine with 5.2.1 I decided to use
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:28:44PM -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hello list,
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle? If so, what are those advantages?
In day-to-day
On Thursday 19 August 2004 03:28, Eric Crist wrote:
Hello list,
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle? If so, what are those
advantages?
Until 5.x goes stable,
Does anyone know is the nvidia drivers work with Xorg?
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 09:28 pm, Eric Crist wrote:
Hello list,
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle?
it was said:
Does anyone know is the nvidia drivers work with Xorg?
Hello,
Yes it does. Check this lists archives for all you need to know as this
topic has come up frequently over the last 6-8 weeks.
HTH,
Stheg
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail
Hello list,
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle? If so, what are those advantages?
Thanks,
Eric F Crist
Best Access Systems
11300 Rupp Dr. Burnsville, MN 55337
Eric Crist wrote:
Hello list,
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle? If so, what are those advantages?
Thanks,
Eric -
first up worth the hassle
1.) on a new install,
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:28:44 -0500
Eric Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I've seen a lot of posts over the past couple months regarding
installation of X.org. I was wondering, is it that much better than
XFree86 that it's worth the hassle? If so, what are those
advantages?
14 matches
Mail list logo
