On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:52:26 -0400
Fbsd8 wrote:
> Da Rock wrote:
> > On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
> >> Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable
> >> system. Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their
> >> dhcp server has an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is no
On 04/01/12 14:06, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 08:57:00 Da Rock wrote:
Did they come to your location and run a test to their equipment? My
neighbor had a recent cable outage of an existing cable on our block
that
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 01 April 2012 08:57:00 Da Rock wrote:
>> >
>> > Did they come to your location and run a test to their equipment? My
>> > neighbor had a recent cable outage of an existing cable on our block
>> > that was too low and a m
Hi,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 08:57:00 Da Rock wrote:
> >
> > Did they come to your location and run a test to their equipment? My
> > neighbor had a recent cable outage of an existing cable on our block
> > that was too low and a moving van hit it.
>
> Apparently the Windows system works, so I'
outside.
What confuses me is that your XP machine gets a 192.168 address between. How
can it access the DHCP then? Can you try to limit the address range to 10.x.y.z
during the negotiation phase?
How do you connect to the cable? Is there som
On 04/01/12 11:22, Al Plant wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 10:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable
system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp
server has an ip address of 1
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 10:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable
system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp server
has an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public routable
On 04/01/12 10:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable
system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp server
has an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public routable. I know
my Fre
Da Rock wrote:
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp server
has an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public routable. I know my
Freebsd 8.2 box functions because it
On 04/01/12 09:52, Fbsd8 wrote:
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp server
has an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public routable. I know my
Freebsd 8.2 box functions because it worked fine und
Just purchased an account on the northern Ohio Time Warner cable system.
Having problem connecting to their service. Seems their dhcp server has
an ip address of 10.2.0.1 which is not public routable. I know my
Freebsd 8.2 box functions because it worked fine under att service which
I just left
Hi, folks. I want to diagnose which programs trigger disk writes,
so I'm wondering if there's a way to determine which processes write
to which files on what disks with what speed?
I know there are gstat(8) and iostat(8) which show how busy each
disk is, but they do not show which files are being
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> ... we're talking about almost 1000 systems
> here. That's a whole bunch of configuration...
Had you considered using something along the lines of
sysutils/puppet?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
rpose if the "shell" (quotes deserved if
it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability
of performing a login.
Are they logging in from the console or from ssh? If it's from a
console, I'd send them directly into a jail with limited file system
access, so that
erved if
it is an editor as shown in my assumption) has no capability
of performing a login.
Are they logging in from the console or from ssh? If it's from a console, I'd
send them directly into a jail with limited file system access, so that
excecutables don't matter. If it
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit
> files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit
> to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec
> requirements
in my assumption) has no capability
of performing a login.
Are they logging in from the console or from ssh? If it's from a
console, I'd send them directly into a jail with limited file system
access, so that excecutables don't matter. If it's from ssh, I'd do t
On 03/12/2012 05:33 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Mar 12 17:46:04 2012
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:47:59 -0700
From: "Edward M."
To: Polytropon
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:20:57PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2012 03:13 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> >>I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit
> >>files. However, under no circumstances
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Mar 12 17:46:04 2012
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:47:59 -0700
> From: "Edward M."
> To: Polytropon
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Editor With NO Shell Access?
>
> On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytro
There are two edits to make to ex_shell.c in /usr/src/contrib/nvi/ex that
will prevent a shell from being executed.
99,100c
return (1);
.
48,51c
return (1);
.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk
> wrote:
> > I have a situation
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:34:18 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 03:47 PM, Edward M. wrote:
> > On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
> >>> On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit
> files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit
> to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec
> requirements
On 03/12/2012 03:47 PM, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I
On 03/12/2012 03:23 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I think this would not let the user to
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:19:51 -0700, Edward M. wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> > /etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
> >
> > bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
>
>
>I think this would not let the user to login,etc
I'm not sure... I ass
On 03/12/2012 03:10 PM, Polytropon wrote:
/etc/shells to work, but a passwd entry like
bob:*:1234:1234:Two-loop-Bob:/home/bob:/usr/local/bin/joe
I think this would not let the user to login,etc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing li
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:40:10 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> You can force a user directly into an editor so they have no shell
> access. For example, if the user has '/bin/csh' as their login shell,
> adding:
>
> exec /usr/local/bin/vim
>
> into their ~/.cshr
... are there editors without this feature? Can I compile something like
joe or vi to inhibit this feature?
I don't know if this will help, but it may provide an idea that could
spark something further.
You can force a user directly into an editor so they have no shell
access. For exampl
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Mar 12 14:22:29 2012
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:19:06 -0500
> From: Tim Daneliuk
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: Editor With NO Shell Access?
>
> I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to e
On 03/12/2012 03:13 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit
files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit
to the shell. The client in question h
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit
> files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit
> to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec
> requi
I have a situation where I need to provide people with the ability to edit
files. However, under no circumstances do I want them to be able to exit
to the shell. The client in question has strong (and unyielding) InfoSec
requirements in this regard.
So ... are there editors without this featur
Hello,
I am doing an analysis on Freebsd subversion access log. One log
extracted from the access log is below.
The piece of log include files and subdirectories which are indicated
"modified" (M).
The subdirectories are:
/stable/7/sbin/geom, /stable/7/sbin/geom/class/label,
/sta
: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:28:21 +0100
From: Polytropon
To: Robert Bonomi
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:12 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote:
To repeat some advice from one of my Computer Science professors, many years
ago, whenever I
012
> >>>> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:28:21 +0100
> >>>> From: Polytropon
> >>>> To: Robert Bonomi
> >>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
> >>>>
> >>>&g
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:12 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote:
To repeat some advice from one of my Computer Science professors, many years
ago, whenever I asked 'how does it work' questions: "Try it and find out."
I bet my profes
> >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >> Subject: Re: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
> >>
> >> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:12 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote:
> >>> To repeat some advice from one of my Computer Science professors, many
> >>> y
On 01/14/12 19:54, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jan 14 02:32:15 2012
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:28:21 +0100
From: Polytropon
To: Robert Bonomi
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:12 -0600 (CST
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jan 14 02:32:15 2012
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:28:21 +0100
> From: Polytropon
> To: Robert Bonomi
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:00:12 -0600 (CST), Rob
Mine used to say several times: "Trial and error is NOT
a programming concept!"
However, your suggestion of creating a simple test case,
together with consulting the documentation, is a fully
valid approach to discover what format path should be
in the int access(const char *path, int
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jan 13 18:15:44 2012
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:05:18 -0800
> From: Gary Kline
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Cc:
> Subject: access(FULLPATH, xxx);
>
>
> excuse this slip of memory, but do you need the full path PLUS t
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:05:18 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> excuse this slip of memory, but do you need the full path PLUS the
> filename to use access? or just the filename?
>
> say that i'm i n ~/tmp/foob and want to deetermine wheether i can
> access file foob. do i ne
excuse this slip of memory, but do you need the full path PLUS the
filename to use access? or just the filename?
say that i'm i n ~/tmp/foob and want to deetermine wheether i can
access file foob. do i need to use "access("home/kline/tmp/foob", F_OK)"
or will "
has been on the installs
>> for a while. I used it on sysinstall on 7.*.
DT> OK, so you didn't actually install remotely via ssh. You installed
DT> locally and let the installer configure sshd for your new install and it
DT> was available after you rebooted into your new inst
lable after you rebooted into your new install.
I'd like to actually be able to install via ssh. Basically I'd like ssh
access to the Live CD so I could partition my drives for zfs prior to
installing. And I'd like to do it from a computer that's connected to
the web so
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Polytropon
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:58 AM
> To: Carl Johnson
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: OT: Root acce
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:15:45 -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Damien Fleuriot writes:
>
> > On 12/29/11 10:58 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:01:42 -0500, Irk Ed wrote:
> >>> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Irk Ed wrote:
> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
> customer's servers.
Are we talking about jail(8)- or server-level root access?
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http:
Damien Fleuriot writes:
> On 12/29/11 10:58 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:01:42 -0500, Irk Ed wrote:
>>> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
>>> customer's servers.
>>
>>> Assuming that I'l
On Dec 29, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Irk Ed wrote:
> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
> customer's servers.
>
> Obviously, I must comply. At the same time, I cannot continue be
> accountable for those servers.
>
> Is this that simple and cle
On Thursday 29 December 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
[snip]
> "sudo su -" or "sudo sh" and the customer gets a native root shell
> which does *not* log commands !
[snip]
> Say the customer can sudo commands located in
> /usr/local/libexec/CUSTOMER/
>
> All he has to do is write a simple link to
gt;
> > Fully correct. Check the contract you made with the
> > customer regarding responsibility and conclusions.
> >
>
> Another way of doing things would be to give the customer root access on
> the server, if it's entirely his, and relinquish your own
On 12/29/11 10:58 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:01:42 -0500, Irk Ed wrote:
>> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
>> customer's servers.
>
> Customer + root@server == !go; :-)
>
>
>
>> Obviously,
On 29/12/2011 09:01, Irk Ed wrote:
> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
> customer's servers.
>
> Obviously, I must comply. At the same time, I cannot continue be
> accountable for those servers.
>
> Is this that simple and clear cut?
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:01:42 -0500, Irk Ed wrote:
> For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
> customer's servers.
Customer + root@server == !go; :-)
> Obviously, I must comply. At the same time, I cannot continue be
> accountable for those server
For the first time, a customer is asking me for root access to said
customer's servers.
Obviously, I must comply. At the same time, I cannot continue be
accountable for those servers.
Is this that simple and clear cut?
Assuming that I'll be asked to continue administering said server
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Reid Linnemann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Daniel Lewis
> wrote:
>> How do I enable Telnet and ftp access for root and users?
>> I turned on ftp and telnet in inetd but when at telenet or ftp prompt
>> access is denied.
>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Daniel Lewis
wrote:
> How do I enable Telnet and ftp access for root and users?
> I turned on ftp and telnet in inetd but when at telenet or ftp prompt
> access is denied.
>
> Im using free bsd 8.2
>
>
>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 06:26:09AM -0600, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> How do I enable Telnet and ftp access for root and users?
> I turned on ftp and telnet in inetd but when at telenet or ftp prompt
> access is denied.
Can we see the error message? Are you sure inetd is running? Using
How do I enable Telnet and ftp access for root and users?
I turned on ftp and telnet in inetd but when at telenet or ftp prompt
access is denied.
Im using free bsd 8.2
Thanks,
Daniel lewis
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I'm having difficulty gaining serial console access to an 8.2-RELEASE
box running ZFS on its root partition. I would appreciate pointers to
help determine if this is a FreeBSD issue, or something external like
BIOS or cabling.
The server is a vanilla 1U Supermicro motherboard with AMI BIOS
Why is my account access limited
Your account access has been limited for the following reason(s):
November. 29, 2011: We have reason to believe that
your account was accessed by a third party. Because protecting the security
of your account is our primary concern, we have limited
lly miss the /dev/acd0t${n} method of
accessing audio tracks. That was truly a handy feature.
> Again, good luck. I won't be partaking of your research since I have
> other PCs near me that are fully capable of preforming the relatively
> simple task of playing an audio CD. However,
On 10/25/11, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> Setting these environment variables had no effect on my machine.
> $cdcontrol play 1 still produces drive activity but no sound. The
> graphical apps I am trying such as Abraca, or MPlayer, still do not seem
> to recognize an audio CD. Gnome Audio CD Extr
Hello.
2011/11/13 07:41:27 -0500 Jerry => To FreeBSD :
J> I often wonder what happened to the premise that computers should make
J> man's life easier, not harder. Why should users be force to go to these
But probably it's easier to plug the wire from cd drive to a sound card?
That way one should
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 04:44:56 -0600
Conrad J. Sabatier articulated:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:25:15 -0500
> "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
> > "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it seems that there's a severe level of "brokenness" that has
> > > bee
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:25:15 -0500
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
> "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> >
> > No, it seems that there's a severe level of "brokenness" that has
> > been introduced into the source tree with regards to CD devices.
> > I've been explorin
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:03:26 -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> On 10/24/11 13:24, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> > Try using:
> >
> > export CDDA_DEVICE=1,0,0
> > export CDR_DEVICE=1,0,0
> >
> > And see if your cdrtools at least work. Audio CD playing apps still
> > have problems, though, unfortunat
On 10/24/11 13:24, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:30:39 -0500
"Michael D. Norwick" wrote:
On 10/23/11 19:25, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
No, it seems that there's a severe level of "brokenness" that has
been int
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:21:14 -0400
Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
> Conrad J. Sabatier articulated:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:19:02 +0200
> > Polytropon wrote:
> > >
> > > What if you use Gnome's CD playing application, or something
> > > like XMMS with the CD audio plugi
On 10/23/11 19:25, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
No, it seems that there's a severe level of "brokenness" that has been
introduced into the source tree with regards to CD devices.
< snip >
Good Day;
Ditto on this thread. No amount o
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
> No, it seems that there's a severe level of "brokenness" that has been
> introduced into the source tree with regards to CD devices. I've been
> exploring this issue on my own system the last couple of days, and am
> no closer to
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:38:29 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier articulated:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:19:02 +0200
> Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > What if you use Gnome's CD playing application, or something
> > like XMMS with the CD audio plugin? I think your permissions
> > are okay so you could make the dri
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:19:02 +0200
Polytropon wrote:
>
> What if you use Gnome's CD playing application, or something
> like XMMS with the CD audio plugin? I think your permissions
> are okay so you could make the drive play from your (non-root)
> user account.
No, it seems that there's a severe
2011-10-20 03:25, Michael D. Norwick skrev:
with a data CD in the drive during reboot.
Trying to manually mount the drive results in;
$ sudo mount_cd9660 /dev/cd0 /media/dvdrom
mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0: Invalid argument
You have a typo in your mount command. The correct one would be;
mount_-t c
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:25:45 -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> Before I recompiled the kernel, when I inserted a music CD, Gnome would
> display a folder containing the *.wav files but I could not play them
> (using the command line or not).
There are no *.wav files on a music CD. This must be
ATA
# SCSI Controllers
# ATA/SCSI peripherals
devicescbus# SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
devicech# SCSI media changers
deviceda # Direct Access (disks)
devicesa# Sequential Access (tape etc)
devicecd# CD
device
On Thu Oct 13 11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Alexander Best writes:
>
> > ano ther thought might be to implement an audio cd filesystem, so one could
> > do
> > 'mount -o audiocdfs /dev/cd0 /media/cd' and then all tracks appear as RAW
> > pcm
> > audio files. maybe fuse comes with something like t
y,
that's why my decision to use cdrecord and cdrdao with
the "SCSI command set".
Still I'm curious how things will develop on application
side with the new subsystem once it's established. At
least I see abandoning the differentiation "acd0 vs. cd0"
as a good th
dmesg | grep ^acd
> acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA66
> acd1: DVDROM at ata1-slave UDMA33
>
> Those are parallel ATA drives, accessed by the ATAPI drivers.
> Because I can either access them as ATAPI drives as well as
> SCSI drives, they show up in both "subsystems"
lel ATA drives, accessed by the ATAPI drivers.
Because I can either access them as ATAPI drives as well as
SCSI drives, they show up in both "subsystems":
% atacontrol list
ATA channel 1:
Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 7
Slave: acd1 ATA/ATAPI revision 6
% camcontrol devlis
0t14 /dev/acd0t18
> /dev/acd0t03 /dev/acd0t07 /dev/acd0t11 /dev/acd0t15 /dev/acd0t19
otaku% ls|grep cd
cd0
cdrom
>
> % ls /dev/cd0*
> /dev/cd0
>
> Maybe obtaining a TOC listing of the CD is required to make the
> track files appear? However, they are only present for t
dev/acd0t15 /dev/acd0t19
% ls /dev/cd0*
/dev/cd0
Maybe obtaining a TOC listing of the CD is required to make the
track files appear? However, they are only present for the ATAPI
based access (acd0), not for the "SCSI" CAM based one (cd0).
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBS
On Thu Oct 13 11, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:25:24 +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > ano ther thought might be to implement an audio cd filesystem, so one could
> > do
> > 'mount -o audiocdfs /dev/cd0 /media/cd' and then all tracks appear as RAW
> > pcm
> > audio files. maybe fuse
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:25:24 +, Alexander Best wrote:
> ano ther thought might be to implement an audio cd filesystem, so one could do
> 'mount -o audiocdfs /dev/cd0 /media/cd' and then all tracks appear as RAW pcm
> audio files. maybe fuse comes with something like this?
What about /dev/acd0t
Alexander Best writes:
> ano ther thought might be to implement an audio cd filesystem, so one could do
> 'mount -o audiocdfs /dev/cd0 /media/cd' and then all tracks appear as RAW pcm
> audio files. maybe fuse comes with something like this?
>
/dev/acdt is no longer supported?
__
On Wed Oct 12 11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Michael D. Norwick" writes:
>
> > Thank You for the replies. Got the part about not mounting an audio
> > CD. I wasn't trying to. Inserting the disc in the drive brought up
> > the error message. Mounting a data CD or DVD acts normally and the
> > fi
Correct, "cd" entry from mixer is
missing.
However, then it didn't stop other tools
from working (I think that at one point I
also used mplayer for CD playback).
best regards and thanks,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:20:49 -0700 (PDT), Jakub Lach wrote:
> Strange thing is, that cdcontrol "works"
> for me, disc is spinning but no sound
> out of speakers.
If there is no entry for CD in the mixer, but for PCM,
it seems to indicate why playback from disk works, but
even (assumed) playbac
f
I recall correctly, however then
I used something like cdparanoia
or cdrtools to play cds.
So I'm afraid, that cdcontrol is not
best diagnostic tool.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-access-a-music-CD-tp4886683p4898453.html
Sent from the freebsd-questio
"Michael D. Norwick" writes:
> Thank You for the replies. Got the part about not mounting an audio
> CD. I wasn't trying to. Inserting the disc in the drive brought up
> the error message. Mounting a data CD or DVD acts normally and the
> filesystem on it can be accessed.
Okay, so what *are*
On Oct 12, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On today's disc drives, you typically don't have a
> 3.5mm headphone connector for direct listening. Also
> some sound cards (unlike most onboard sound chips)
> have the ability to connect the "CD audio" wire inside
> the machine. This feature is obs
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:49:58 -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> Thank You for the replies. Got the part about not mounting an audio
> CD. I wasn't trying to. Inserting the disc in the drive brought up the
> error message. Mounting a data CD or DVD acts normally and the
> filesystem on it can
On 10/12/11 18:33, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
"Michael D. Norwick" writes:
A dialog box dislplaying the following,
Unable to mount Audio Disc
You're not supposed to mount an audio disk.
There's even a FAQ entry titled
"Why can I not mount an audio CD?"
http://be-well.ilk.org/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO
"Michael D. Norwick" writes:
> A dialog box dislplaying the following,
>
> Unable to mount Audio Disc
You're not supposed to mount an audio disk.
There's even a FAQ entry titled
"Why can I not mount an audio CD?"
http://be-well.ilk.org/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#MOUNT-AUDI
eive a
> reply (timeout by message bus)
You cannot mount an audio CD, it doesn't contain a file
system.
Idea: Maybe some kind of interference of your desktop
environment that intends to mount a CD that cannot be
mounted, and the command line tool trying to access
a resource that is blocked
On 10/10/11 05:44, Frank Shute wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:47:40AM -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
On 10/10/11 01:37, Frank Shute wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:33:01PM -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
< snip >
This looks like it's playing. Is the CD/DVD drive active?
< snip >
Sti
# SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
> >>devicech # SCSI media changers
> >>deviceatapicam
> >>deviceda# Direct Access (disks)
> >>devicesa# Sequential Access (tape etc)
> >>devicecd# CD
>
worlds and kernels with the
following devices enabled in the kernel config.;
devicescbus# SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
devicech# SCSI media changers
deviceatapicam
deviceda# Direct Access (disks)
devicesa# Sequential Access
101 - 200 of 1560 matches
Mail list logo
