for statically
configured nodes, servers, access points etc. The 172.16.1/24 I use for
dynamically configured nodes, laptops.
The reason is that I'm using dynamic dns on my LAN. The reverse map
zones cannot be created for classless networks, you have to define
reverse zone for a /16 or /24 network
in order to set up
an internal network which can access the outside internet directly.
If so, can someone give me a really minimal yet secure packet filter
rule set that would do the job? (I'm prepared to read the pf docs,
which will take me a few hours.) The router will connect to the
outside via DHCP
On Saturday 08 August 2009 18:32:30 Nerius Landys wrote:
First, my choise of internal network IP addresses is 192.168.0.x. My
router machine's IP address will be 192.168.0.254 (that's the
interface facing the internal network). The IP addresses of the
machines behind the router will start
Gardner Bell gbel...@rogers.com wrote:
The stench from Denmark is getting to me... ;-)
Insulting much with your remark about Denmark?
Methinks it be an oblique reference to
a line from Shakespeare's play about the Dane
with no insult intended, then or now.
Gardner Bell wrote:
Gardner Bell
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
From: PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca
Subject: Re: how to boot or access problem file system
To: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: Friday, July 31, 2009, 8:44 PM
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gardner Bell gbel...@rogers.com wrote:
The stench from Denmark is getting to me... ;-)
Insulting much with your remark about Denmark?
Methinks it be an oblique reference to
a line from Shakespeare's play about the Dane
with no insult intended,
On Thursday 30 July 2009 23:14:39 PJ wrote:
But isn't it strange that it used to be pretty simple to upgrade and
update. But recently, I notice that communication between the developers
and users (or is it the manual page writers) are getting far away from
the realities of user/operational
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:20:55PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
I forgot to mention
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:36:23PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Thanks for replying Roland,
I've been struggling with upgrading 7.0 to 7.2... it has taken a lot of
my time and I am still not happy.
snip
Anyway... back to the messed up 7.1 installation.
I ran livefs 7.1 and chose option 6 (I think; it was
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:20:55PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
I forgot to mention
Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:36:23PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Thanks for replying Roland,
I've been struggling with upgrading 7.0 to 7.2... it has taken a lot of
my time and I am still not happy.
snip
Anyway... back to the messed up 7.1 installation.
I ran livefs 7.1
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:12:21PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:20:55PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:42:43PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Basically, the news is not good.
The directories files are not what I had to begin with.
ls /dev/ad0s1 or any disk/slice merely gets: Permission denied.
Now that is certainly weird. :-) I've never come across something like that.
What do
be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
I forgot to mention that your boot sector is fine. If it were screwed
up, you wouldn't get to the boot prompt.
Since the boot code cannot locate your kernel, there are several things
that could
Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:42:43PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Basically, the news is not good.
The directories files are not what I had to begin with.
ls /dev/ad0s1 or any disk/slice merely gets: Permission denied.
Now that is certainly weird. :-) I've never come across
PJ wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:42:43PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Basically, the news is not good.
The directories files are not what I had to begin with.
ls /dev/ad0s1 or any disk/slice merely gets: Permission denied.
Now that is certainly weird. :-) I've never come
Gardner Bell
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
From: PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca
Subject: Re: how to boot or access problem file system
To: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: Friday, July 31, 2009, 8:44 PM
PJ wrote:
Roland
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
The /usr files should be ok but how to access?
I get errors that the file system is full and I have no idea of how to
deal with the boot up - the help message is no help!
Boot says it cannot find a kernel
On 7/30/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
The /usr files should be ok but how to access?
I get errors that the file system is full and I have no idea of how to
deal with the boot up - the help message
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
Do you mean the filesystem's superblock? Or the slice table (partitions
in PC parlance) or the freebsd partitions (disk labels)? Because the
boot sector
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
Do you mean the filesystem's superblock? Or the slice table (partitions
in PC parlance) or the freebsd partitions (disk
Tim Judd wrote:
On 7/30/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
The /usr files should be ok but how to access?
I get errors that the file system is full and I have no idea of how to
deal with the boot
PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
Usually there are more than 1 file system present. The MBR will have no
bearing on any other than the one you need to boot from, and this is usually
the / - aka root. Having a screwed up MBR
Michael Powell wrote:
PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
Usually there are more than 1 file system present. The MBR will have no
bearing on any other than the one you need to boot from, and this is usually
--On Thursday, July 30, 2009 14:45:46 -0500 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Mike,
I am not particularly interested in becoming a guru on FreeBSD. I just
want to be able to use it productively... by that I do not mean make
money, but get something achieved in the way of programming stuff for
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, July 30, 2009 14:45:46 -0500 PJ
af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Mike,
I am not particularly interested in becoming a guru on FreeBSD. I just
want to be able to use it productively... by that I do not mean make
money, but get something achieved in the way of
On 7/30/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Tim Judd wrote:
On 7/30/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
The /usr files should be ok but how to access?
I get errors that the file system is full and I
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:20:55PM -0400, PJ wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
I forgot to mention that your boot sector is fine. If it were screwed
up
Can anybody remind me what all I need to do to create a new virtual
website? (Or move /usr/local/www/foo to /usr/local/www/bar/ and have
bar be my new website? I've seen this lynx error:
Can't access startfile before and can't remeber what I'm doing wrong
access startfile before and can't remeber what I'm doing wrong.
thanks for some clues here,
Take a look at the error log for apache, as I suspect the following:
usually, apache wants to look in /usr/local/www/apache22/* for its
information. If you have changed DocumentRoot, could you give
bar be my new website? I've seen this lynx error:
Can't access startfile before and can't remeber what I'm doing
wrong.
thanks for some clues here,
Take a look at the error log for apache, as I suspect the following:
usually, apache wants to look in /usr/local/www
bar be my new website? I've seen this lynx error:
Can't access startfile before and can't remeber what I'm doing
wrong.
thanks for some clues here,
Take a look at the error log for apache, as I suspect the following:
usually, apache wants to look in /usr/local/www
? (Or move /usr/local/www/foo to /usr/local/www/bar/ and
have
bar be my new website? I've seen this lynx error:
Can't access startfile before and can't remeber what I'm doing
wrong.
thanks for some clues here,
Take a look at the error log for apache, as I suspect
website? (Or move /usr/local/www/foo to /usr/local/www/bar/ and
have
bar be my new website? I've seen this lynx error:
Can't access startfile before and can't remeber what I'm doing
wrong.
thanks for some clues here,
Take a look at the error log for apache
has some clues re wha' happened, Pulleze
clue
me in. there was nothing in the error log; it was dated
Perhaps the logs didn't rotate? When was the last time that the
access log was 'touch'ed?
2 drwxr-xr-x 3 www www 1024 Jan 13 2008 error
4 drwxr-xr-x 3 www www 3584 Jan 13
.
meanwhile, if anybody else has some clues re wha' happened, Pulleze
clue
me in. there was nothing in the error log; it was dated
Perhaps the logs didn't rotate? When was the last time that the
access log was 'touch'ed?
where do i check, glen? my favoite place to grep around
that the
access log was 'touch'ed?
where do i check, glen? my favoite place to grep around is /var/logs,
and the httpd-error.log has some potentially serious [warn]ing
messages,
but i'm not familiar with apache22.
There should be a httpd-access.log -- 'ls -a' should
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 07:23:33PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
... especially since rebooting (ideally) shouldn't _fix_ apache22
problems.. If that works, it is only masking the real problem.
Do you remember any other major changes to your system or apache22
since your last reboot or
Hello,
Full documentation here:
http://blog.cykyc.org/2009/05/macportacl-and-no-love.html
Gist of it is that I enabled MAC_PORTACL and MAC, rebuilt the kernel
and installed it for testing. I was not able to get a non-super user
to open up a privileged port, though.
What am I doing wrong?
Nevermind, forgot to set the following:
net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedlow: 0
net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh: 0
With these set, portacl is working as expected.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Jon Passki jon.pas...@hursk.com wrote:
Hello,
Full documentation here:
specified access account has
been locked and needs to be reactivated, in order for it to remain
active, please Use the link below to proceed and unlock your account.
So we want you to use this oppurtunity to upgrade your account to our
new security with the Santander Group, one of the largest
On Saturday 25 April 2009 09:12:50 pm Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:35:34 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net
wrote:
I'm working on a machine learning project and I'd like to use the
FreeBSD src CVS commit history as a datasource. Is there a
resource-friendly way for
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:23:32 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
On Saturday 25 April 2009 09:12:50 pm Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:35:34 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net
wrote:
I'm working on a machine learning project and I'd like to use the
FreeBSD src
On Monday 27 April 2009 12:39:53 pm Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:23:32 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net
wrote:
I'm basically looking for a list of all commits over the past N (2)
years with committer, timestamp, affected file(s) and/or subsystems
and possibly diff
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:03:30 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
I installed the subversion-freebsd port and pulled in src from head.
This lets me do e.g. svn log -g --xml locally and get an XML list of
commits along the main (head/current) development line going back to
1993.
For
On Monday 27 April 2009 03:29:03 pm Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:03:30 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net
wrote:
I installed the subversion-freebsd port and pulled in src from
head. This lets me do e.g. svn log -g --xml locally and get an
XML list of commits along
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:35:34 -0400, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
I'm working on a machine learning project and I'd like to use the
FreeBSD src CVS commit history as a datasource. Is there a
resource-friendly way for me to download some or all of it? Format
isn't too big an issue.
I
I'm working on a machine learning project and I'd like to use the FreeBSD
src CVS commit history as a datasource. Is there a resource-friendly way
for me to download some or all of it? Format isn't too big an issue.
I tried a few cvs history commands against the anoncvs servers but get
this:
are one option, but I was hoping for
more of a direct approach if possible.
cvs log filename works, but I don't think that history has even been available
on any system I've ever had access to. There's pretty good info available from
the cvs log command ... here's a few lines from cvs log Makefile
John Nielsen wrote:
I'm working on a machine learning project and I'd like to use the FreeBSD
src CVS commit history as a datasource. Is there a resource-friendly way
for me to download some or all of it? Format isn't too big an issue.
I tried a few cvs history commands against the anoncvs
DAve dave.l...@pixelhammer.com wrote:
DAve wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today.
We have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to
have a unique login to the same apache site root.
That would be a unique FTP
Good afternoon all,
I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today. We
have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to have a
unique login to the same apache site root.
I am not even certain that is possible. Anyone have any ideas? This is a
dedicated
DAve wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today. We
have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to have a
unique login to the same apache site root.
That would be a unique FTP login, again, my mind is toast today.
DAve
I
DAve wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today. We
have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to have a
unique login to the same apache site root.
I am not even certain that is possible. Anyone have any ideas? This is
a
netblocks with your firewall (possibly causing
a denial of service on legitimate hosts), it's easier and more resource
friendly to create access rules that deny by default in ANY case. (Those
who provide transit or hosting services can obviously ignore this).
Steve
What information should I send to an ab...@* address when reporting a
break-in attempt?
My logs show a dictionary attack of invalid user names against port 22. I
obtained an ab...@* email address using 'whois' and reported the beginning
and ending date/times and the originating IP address.
Is
My logs show a dictionary attack of invalid user names against port 22. I
obtained an ab...@* email address using 'whois' and reported the beginning
and ending date/times and the originating IP address.
Is there any other information I need to send?
i don't think so.
anyway - if all password
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Andrew Gould wrote:
What information should I send to an ab...@* address when reporting a
break-in attempt?
My logs show a dictionary attack of invalid user names against port
22.
So source of these is almost always some other compromised Unix-like
system.
proved a waste of time.
If you are using 'passwords' to access your account, you might want to consider
using certificates instead. That is far safer than using a password that
eventually can be cracked.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
log with the data that pertained to the user in
question; however, that just proved a waste of time.
If you are using 'passwords' to access your account, you might want to
consider using certificates instead. That is far safer than using a password
that eventually can be cracked.
--
Jerry
are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for
details.
This GDB was configured as amd64-marcel-freebsd...
Cannot access memory at address 0xb
(kgdb) bt
#0
I installed a D-Link WDA-2320 (Atheros chipset) wireless nic on my FreeBSD
7.1 system. I configured it as an access point. I read many posts on that
topic and I am confused whether I need to bridge the wireless network to the
wired network or just let the FreeBSD gateway to manage that.
So far
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 06:00:08 regis505 wrote:
I installed a D-Link WDA-2320 (Atheros chipset) wireless nic on my FreeBSD
7.1 system. I configured it as an access point. I read many posts on that
topic and I am confused whether I need to bridge the wireless network to
the wired network
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 09:22:22PM -0700, Andrew Falanga wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 5:42 PM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
I am having a bit of a problem enabling remote access to postgress on my
7.1 system.
I have added to postgresql.conf
listen_addresses
On Jan 1, 2009 4:34am, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Thanks.
I did get it working. Here is the line that I used in rc.conf:
postgresql_flags=-o '-i' -w -s -m fast
As a point of information, what was confusing me was, i had increased the
number of connections in postgresql.conf. This had
I am having a bit of a problem enabling remote access to postgress on my
7.1 system.
I have added to postgresql.conf
listen_addresses = '*'
and to pg_hba.conf
hostall all XXX.159.77.0/24 trust
XX is a real number, and is the first octect of the network
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 5:42 PM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
I am having a bit of a problem enabling remote access to postgress on my
7.1 system.
I have added to postgresql.conf
listen_addresses = '*'
and to pg_hba.conf
hostall all XXX.159.77.0/24 trust
XX
Mel пишет:
On Friday 26 December 2008 08:12:49 Artem Kuchin wrote:
I am not even sure that it is related to freebsd, but maybe someone could
point out the problem.
We wanted to upgrade our hosting server from
FreeBSD 6.2, 3ware 8506-4LP SATA RAID, raid 5
to
FreeBSD 7.1 (RC for now),
On Friday 26 December 2008 08:12:49 Artem Kuchin wrote:
I am not even sure that it is related to freebsd, but maybe someone could
point out the problem.
We wanted to upgrade our hosting server from
FreeBSD 6.2, 3ware 8506-4LP SATA RAID, raid 5
to
FreeBSD 7.1 (RC for now), 9550SXU-4LP, raid
I am not even sure that it is related to freebsd, but maybe someone could
point out the problem.
We wanted to upgrade our hosting server from
FreeBSD 6.2, 3ware 8506-4LP SATA RAID, raid 5
to
FreeBSD 7.1 (RC for now), 9550SXU-4LP, raid 10
We have tested the new installation on ASUS P5K WS
Chen Xu wrote:
$cmd 100 divert natd ip from any to any in via $pif
$cmd 101 check-state
You use in via $pif, I'm not 100% sure but I think you should only use
via $pif.
# Authorized inbound packets
$cmd 421 allow tcp from any to 192.168.1.10 80 in via $pif setup limit
src-addr 5
I
Hi Christer,
I followed the example from the handbook. Yes, it is OK to divert in and
out separately. skipto is used to point to the divert out rule number
when it is outbound.
I run into problem only when with natd to redirect from gateway to local
machine. tcpdump shows that packets of both
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:22 -0700, mdh wrote:
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to get my Dad's Win2k system to access internet through my
FreeBSD 6.2 system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, October
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 06:54 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
[snip]
I'm assuming the problem with double nat'ing is the confusion in packet
traffic. So if the OP is using his ADSL modem to connect to the net,
then it could be safe to assume the public IP would be to the
it something different.
If you enable this feature, what happens is this:
The modem requires you to access its administrative web page. You
insert your PPPoE Username and Password (which it saves to
NVRAM/EEPROM), and click Connect. The DSL modem then continues to do
the PPPoE encapsulation, so
to
act like something that sits between layer 2 and layer 3 -- yet is not a
router. Different modems call it something different.
If you enable this feature, what happens is this:
The modem requires you to access its administrative web page. You
insert your PPPoE Username and Password (which
Da Rock wrote:
[snip]
I'm assuming the problem with double nat'ing is the confusion in packet
traffic. So if the OP is using his ADSL modem to connect to the net,
then it could be safe to assume the public IP would be to the modem
itself, and not his box (barring the possible use of USB), so
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:43:48 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Michael's describing is a feature many DSL modems offer. There
is no official term for what it is,
They are commonly referred to as half-bridge modems.
The reason this feature is HIGHLY desired is because not
On 10/14/2008 at 12:03 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Manish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| I am poor at networking and need a little bit of help. My dad has a
| Windows 2000 machine with a network card but does not have a connection
| to the internet.
|
|When I started writing this, I
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 06:46 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:55:11AM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
[snip]
Next, you will want to configure your FreeBSD machine as a NAT gateway.
In your /etc/rc.conf you will want something like
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:40:48PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 06:46 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:55:11AM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
[snip]
Next, you will want to configure your FreeBSD machine as a NAT gateway.
Unless the question is as broad as 'how do I learn about FreeBSD' it
is worthwhile to help the person aim that shotgun or exchange it
for a rifle.
Interesting analogy- I like it :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 04:10 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:40:48PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 06:46 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:55:11AM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
[snip]
Next,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:15:49AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 04:10 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:40:48PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 06:46 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 21:19 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:15:49AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 04:10 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:40:48PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 06:46 -0400, Michael Powell
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to get my Dad's Win2k system to access internet through my
FreeBSD 6.2 system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 1:04 AM
grin Actually I'm not sure
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:35:31 +0300, Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Adding a few options in `loader.conf' should preload IPFW and DIVERT in
the running kernel:
ipfw_load=YES
ipdivert_load=YES
Then the rest of the `rc.conf' options described in the
access the internet easily, I want my dad to be able to connect to
the internet with my freebsd box serving as the gateway. Can anyone please
explain to me in easy steps how to accomplish this ?
reading admin's handbook or using google will give you an answer
True, but often it is helpful
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to
accomplish
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to
accomplish
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to accomplish
and rl1. rl0 connects to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:40:01 +0300, Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inspired by this discussion (and just replying to a random post) I
tried for the first time to get a test machine as a gateway. I tried
the handbook's instructions, here:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Hi Manolis everyone else,
`ipdivert.ko' works fine as a module too. You don't really *have* to
recompile the kernel, but we probably have to update the relevant
Handbook bits to mention that `ipdivert.ko' can be kldload'ed now.
Adding a few options in `loader.conf'
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to
accomplish
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to
accomplish
and rl1. rl0 connects to the
ISP and rl1 is directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the
NIC on my dad's machine. While I can access the internet easily, I
want my dad to be able to connect to the internet with my freebsd
box serving as the gateway. Can anyone please explain to me
Dear All,
I think I need help from the group. The situation is kind of simple,
but I can not get it work for me.
I wanted to access to a web server behind of firewall/gateway
191.168.1.1 (firewall/gateway/natd)
192.168.1.10 (internal web server)
191.168.1.1 has these info.
=
FreeBSD
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to
accomplish
to the ISP and rl1 is
directly connected via a long Ethernet cable to the NIC on my dad's
machine. While I can access the internet easily, I want my dad to be
able to connect to the internet with my freebsd box serving as the
gateway. Can anyone please explain to me in easy steps how to
accomplish
401 - 500 of 1514 matches
Mail list logo
