On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
>>> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
>>> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of
- Sent via BlackBerry from Thai Citrus
-Original Message-
From: Walter Hurry
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.orgDate: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51
To:
Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 24/11/2012 20
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
>> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
>> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the
>> remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against r
On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote
> repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite.
>
> That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg upda
When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote
repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite.
That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first?
__
Hi all,
I am having troubles using sphinxsearch 2.0.5 under a freebsd 8.3
hosts ... Daniel Ylitalo asked the same question a few months ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-June/242875.html
and my response to Michael Powell about using from the ports system
is negativ
Please create a PR for any problems you find here or additions to
install.cfg that you would like to see, and I'll take a look at it.
-- randi
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Martin McCormick
wrote:
> I really hate to give up on anything and I finally found
> out my problem with getting
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Martin McCormick
wrote:
> J65nko writes:
>> IMHO it is easier to to install FreeBSD without using sysinstall at all.
>>
>> See the "FreeBSD Install Without Sysinstall" guide at
>> http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=1538
>
> This looks very possible
J65nko writes:
> IMHO it is easier to to install FreeBSD without using sysinstall at all.
>
> See the "FreeBSD Install Without Sysinstall" guide at
> http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=1538
This looks very possible with a couple of changes. Am I
right in my reading of the man pa
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Martin McCormick
wrote:
> I really hate to give up on anything and I finally found
> out my problem with getting sysinstall to use the hard drive
> rather than garbaging up mfs every time. The problem is not
> something you can set in the partition editor or
I really hate to give up on anything and I finally found
out my problem with getting sysinstall to use the hard drive
rather than garbaging up mfs every time. The problem is not
something you can set in the partition editor or disklabel
editor. It is found in the very first menu which oddly
You'll never silence the voice of the voiceless, Mel!
Yes.
Ruleset name did not resolve into the number. So rc.subr asked for a digit and
I provided a number that way.
It was too obvious for me to specify the 'devfsrules_' prefix for the case it
cannot be anything other than devfs rules.
And so
On Sunday 25 January 2009 02:35:16 Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I always try to set up the devfs ruleset in rc.conf. So my question is
> about this in /etc/defaults/rc.conf: ===
> #jail_example_devfs_ruleset="ruleset_name" # devfs ruleset to apply to
> jail ===
>
> It appears not to wo
Hello,
I always try to set up the devfs ruleset in rc.conf. So my question is about
this in /etc/defaults/rc.conf:
===
#jail_example_devfs_ruleset="ruleset_name" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail
===
It appears not to work in /etc/rc.conf without this rc.subr patch:
===
$ diff -u /etc/rc.su
> > Unfortunately, the poor support for Flash, as well as other common web
> > features under FBSD, is a prime reason that I continue to keep my WinXP
>
> or - like me, you may simply don't use it.
...
> if others require flash7, java or other craps, they just don't want me to
> be their client.
..
Unfortunately, the poor support for Flash, as well as other common web
features under FBSD, is a prime reason that I continue to keep my WinXP
flash is a proprietary feature, which doesn't run FreeBSD.
you may try to use linux browsers under emulation, you may use windows or
do whatever else.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:53:41AM -0500, Gerard wrote:
> I belong to a state 'Officials Association' that deals with officiating
> High School sports. Their site is written in such a way that Flash with
> either Windows Media Player or QuickTime are required to properly view
> the site.
So their
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:25:15 -0600
eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Flash is becoming more dominate daily and there are many sites that
> are basically unusable without it. Some banking, telco, etc. sites,
> etc. That are difficult if not impossible too use for account
> access wi
Guys,
One of the last tricks is to get lpr working from oldtao to
newtao--(once I'm done with my paper, I'll try to puzzle out
CUPS; for now I need too be able to print OOo files on my printserver).
It/printing finallly Does work across the wire, but this
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I too have this problem (I dual boot Win 2K/FreeBSD on my desktop).
> Everything works fine, but I think what Ron wants to know is simply can
> you change the ??? into Windows for example?
The partition type code -> OS name translation table is hardwi
Clark
Sent: 06 October 2003 20:24
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Another question - Boot Menu
How does one edit the menu options when using the
FreeBSD boot menu to dual boot with Windows? Currently
mine says:
F1: ???
F2: FreeBSD
I searched the archives, but did not find my answer.
Thanks,
Ron
onday, October 06, 2003 2:54 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Another question - Boot Menu
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:24:07PM -0700, Ronnie Clark wrote:
> How does one edit the menu options when using the
> FreeBSD boot menu to dual boot with Windows? Currently
> mine says:
> F1:
Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Points for searching the archives, but in this case it's an FAQ. :)
Specifically,
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#CHANGING-BOOTPROMPT
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.fre
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:48:16 -0400, Timothy Luoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 12:24:07 -0700 (PDT), Ronnie Clark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does one edit the menu options when using the
FreeBSD boot menu to dual boot with Windows? Currently
mine says:
F1: ???
F2: FreeBSD
I
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:24:07PM -0700, Ronnie Clark wrote:
> How does one edit the menu options when using the
> FreeBSD boot menu to dual boot with Windows? Currently
> mine says:
> F1: ???
> F2: FreeBSD
Does pressing F1 actually boots Windows? Which version of windows
do you have installed?
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 12:24:07 -0700 (PDT), Ronnie Clark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does one edit the menu options when using the
FreeBSD boot menu to dual boot with Windows? Currently
mine says:
F1: ???
F2: FreeBSD
I searched the archives, but did not find my answer.
I believe that is just what
How does one edit the menu options when using the
FreeBSD boot menu to dual boot with Windows? Currently
mine says:
F1: ???
F2: FreeBSD
I searched the archives, but did not find my answer.
Thanks,
Ron Clark
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improve
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
> Eric Dedrick wrote:
>
>>> I dont know why this happens but if its any comfort I have had
>>> similar errors on my machine for years.
>>>
>>> Jul 4 14:40:43 rambo /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.3 is on lo0 but got
>>> reply from 00:48:54:50:e4:96 on fxp0
>>> Jul 8 1
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
> Eric Dedrick wrote:
>
>> Natd hasn't exactly been working as it used to either. Any idea what
>> this
>> means?
>>
>> Jul 24 23:26:43 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on lo0 but got
>> reply from 00:04:76:b8:94:10 on ep0
>> Jul 24 23:28:17 dsl-146
Eric Dedrick wrote:
>>I dont know why this happens but if its any comfort I have had
>>similar errors on my machine for years.
>>
>>Jul 4 14:40:43 rambo /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.3 is on lo0 but got
>>reply from 00:48:54:50:e4:96 on fxp0
>>Jul 8 15:13:36 rambo /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on dc1 b
Eric Dedrick wrote:
> Natd hasn't exactly been working as it used to either. Any idea what this
> means?
>
> Jul 24 23:26:43 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on lo0 but got
> reply from 00:04:76:b8:94:10 on ep0
> Jul 24 23:28:17 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 128.211.146.127 is on lo0 but
> Do you have 192.168.0.1 as your default router on the other machines?
Apparently not. Thanks. That fixed it.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Eric Dedrick wrote:
>>It usually occurs when you have them all plugged into the same
>>circuit. My natd connection is connected to a switch connected to my
>>DSL modem. My internal NIC is connected to a switch where all of my
>>computers are connected. Natd works just fine.
>>
>>The messages wi
> It usually occurs when you have them all plugged into the same
> circuit. My natd connection is connected to a switch connected to my
> DSL modem. My internal NIC is connected to a switch where all of my
> computers are connected. Natd works just fine.
>
> The messages with lo0 makes me wonder i
Eric Dedrick wrote:
> Natd hasn't exactly been working as it used to either. Any idea what this
> means?
>
> Jul 24 23:26:43 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on lo0 but got
> reply from 00:04:76:b8:94:10 on ep0
> Jul 24 23:28:17 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 128.211.146.127 is on lo0 b
Natd hasn't exactly been working as it used to either. Any idea what this
means?
Jul 24 23:26:43 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 192.168.0.1 is on lo0 but got
reply from 00:04:76:b8:94:10 on ep0
Jul 24 23:28:17 dsl-146-127 /kernel: arp: 128.211.146.127 is on lo0 but
got reply from 00:60:08:10:e6:e
1) to work. This
results in another question to which answers would be very much
appreciated. :-)
Running top as root and pressing ^T revealed that top most (at least
practically) of the time was stuck at a select call. Looking at the
trace dump showed that one NIS entry was read repeatedly. (Som
1) to work. This
results in another question to which answers would be very much
appreciated. :-)
Running top as root and pressing ^T revealed that top most (at least
practically) of the time was stuck at a select call. Looking at the
trace dump showed that one NIS entry was read repeatedly. (Some
s
38 matches
Mail list logo
