Karl Vogel wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:03:06 +0200, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
R> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote:
J> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
J> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Th
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:03:06 +0200, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
R> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote:
J> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
J> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
J>
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 15:20 -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
> primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV
> scanning would be a plus
On October 01, 2007 at 01:31PM Ryan Phillips wrote:
> Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(
> >
> > as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and
> > the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes h
etc.
Cheers,
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pollywog
Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2007 8:48 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:48:09 Pollywog wrote:
> On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> > >> By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-
> > >> weight.
> > >> mail/postfix-policyd-weight
> > >
> > >
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> >> By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-
> >> weight.
> >> mail/postfix-policyd-weight
> >
> > Agreed. +1. Me too.
>
> Seconded (or thirded :).
>
> policyd-weig
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-
weight.
mail/postfix-policyd-weight
Agreed. +1. Me too.
Seconded (or thirded :).
policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it
tends to run a couple
By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-weight.
mail/postfix-policyd-weight
Agreed. +1. Me too.
:)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
--On Monday, October 01, 2007 06:21:48 +0100 Martin Hepworth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the
correct installation type.
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:
postfix:politics
By far the best
On 10/1/07, Ryan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(
> >
> > as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues
> and
> > the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes
Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(
>
> as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and
> the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-)
The Better Gmail plugin for Firefox includes an option t
On 9/30/07, Joe in MPLS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
> primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV
> scanning would be a plus too.
>
On October 01, 2007 at 06:39AM Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(
Actually, Outlook can be configured to place replies at the bottom of
a replied to message.
I am amazed though that you have not been able to figure out how to
navigate to the botto
Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-(
as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and
the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-)
--
martin
On 10/1/07, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On October 01, 2007 at 01:21AM Martin Hepwor
On October 01, 2007 at 01:21AM Martin Hepworth wrote:
> On 9/30/07, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote:
> > > At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote:
> > > >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde
> > f
Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the
correct installation type.
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics
--
Martin
On 9/30/07, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Rago
On Sunday 30 September 2007 21:03:06 Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote:
> > I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
> > mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
> > primary spam control (espe
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
> primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV
> scanning would be
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote:
> At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote:
> >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
> >mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
> >primary spam control (especially because our PDA
At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote:
I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV
scanning would be a plus too.
I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for
mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for
primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV
scanning would be a plus too.
...jgm
_
22 matches
Mail list logo