Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-08 Thread Elvar
Karl Vogel wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:03:06 +0200, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: R> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: J> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for J> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Th

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-04 Thread Karl Vogel
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:03:06 +0200, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: R> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: J> I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for J> mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for J>

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-02 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 15:20 -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: > I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > scanning would be a plus

Re[4]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Gerard
On October 01, 2007 at 01:31PM Ryan Phillips wrote: > Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( > > > > as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and > > the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes h

RE: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Terry Sposato
etc. Cheers, Terry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pollywog Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2007 8:48 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Pollywog
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:48:09 Pollywog wrote: > On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > > >> By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- > > >> weight. > > >> mail/postfix-policyd-weight > > > > > >

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Pollywog
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > >> By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- > >> weight. > >> mail/postfix-policyd-weight > > > > Agreed. +1. Me too. > > Seconded (or thirded :). > > policyd-weig

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. Seconded (or thirded :). policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it tends to run a couple

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Philip Hallstrom
By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, October 01, 2007 06:21:48 +0100 Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta: postfix:politics By far the best

Re: Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Martin Hepworth
On 10/1/07, Ryan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( > > > > as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues > and > > the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes

Re: Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Ryan Phillips
Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( > > as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and > the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-) The Better Gmail plugin for Firefox includes an option t

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Kurt Buff
On 9/30/07, Joe in MPLS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > scanning would be a plus too. >

Re[4]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Gerard
On October 01, 2007 at 06:39AM Martin Hepworth wrote: > Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( Actually, Outlook can be configured to place replies at the bottom of a replied to message. I am amazed though that you have not been able to figure out how to navigate to the botto

Re: Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Martin Hepworth
Top posting is gmail being broken - just like Outleek ;-( as for the whole mailscanner/postfix thing I'm very aware of the issues and the fact no-one who actually works WW with likes him ;-) -- martin On 10/1/07, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On October 01, 2007 at 01:21AM Martin Hepwor

Re[2]: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-10-01 Thread Gerard
On October 01, 2007 at 01:21AM Martin Hepworth wrote: > On 9/30/07, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: > > > At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: > > > >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde > > f

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-09-30 Thread Martin Hepworth
Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics -- Martin On 9/30/07, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Rago

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-09-30 Thread Pollywog
On Sunday 30 September 2007 21:03:06 Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: > > I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > > mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > > primary spam control (espe

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-09-30 Thread Roland Smith
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: > I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > scanning would be

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-09-30 Thread Pollywog
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: > >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for > >mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > >primary spam control (especially because our PDA

Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-09-30 Thread Derek Ragona
At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too.

best spam filter port(s) for postfix?

2007-09-30 Thread Joe in MPLS
I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm _