Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:25 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Aug 29 11:11:10 esmtp postfix/master[67333]:
> > > warning: /usr/local/libexec/postfix/pipe: bad command startup --
> > > throttling
>
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:25 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Aug 29 11:11:10 esmtp postfix/master[67333]:
> > warning: /usr/local/libexec/postfix/pipe: bad command startup --
> > throttling
> > Aug 29 11:11:51 esmtp postfix/master[67333]:
> > warning
Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Victor referred me to the archives after finding out I have linked
> > > Postfix with a broken GNU getopt(), but I have not been able to come up
> > > with the solution. My current getopt package is gengetopt-2.11, should I
> > > resort to an ea
> > Victor referred me to the archives after finding out I have linked
> > Postfix with a broken GNU getopt(), but I have not been able to come up
> > with the solution. My current getopt package is gengetopt-2.11, should I
> > resort to an earlier version and re-compile Postfix?
> >
>
> Look at
Forwarded Message
> > Victor referred me to the archives after finding out I have linked
> > Postfix with a broken GNU getopt(), but I have not been able to come up
> > with the solution. My current getopt package is gengetopt-2.11, should I
> > resort to an earlier version and re
