in message 20100624192256.gf...@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com,
wrote Chip Camden thusly...
On Jun 24 08:39, Parv wrote:
in message 20100624183407.ga49...@holstein.holy.cow,
wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
# Matches a number, either positive (without '+' sign) or
# negative,
in message 87d3vgmj1s@cjlinux.localnet,
wrote Carl Johnson thusly...
Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org writes:
Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org writes:
vogelke+u...@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) writes:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:24:39 +0800,
Aiza aiz...@comclark.com said:
A Receiving a variable
in message 20100624183407.ga49...@holstein.holy.cow,
wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
# Matches a number, either positive (without '+' sign) or
# negative, which is either a whole number; or a real number
# ending with decimal point, or a real number with or without
# leading digits before
On Jun 24 08:39, Parv wrote:
in message 20100624183407.ga49...@holstein.holy.cow,
wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
# Matches a number, either positive (without '+' sign) or
# negative, which is either a whole number; or a real number
# ending with decimal point, or a real number with or
p...@pair.com writes:
if expr $arg : [1-9]*\.\{0,1\}[0-9]*$ /dev/null
That regex considers . a number but not 0.9 (this one seems to
be due to typo) nor a negative number.
I had been pointing out an error in the regular expression that
someone else had posted, but I obviously didn't do
