I am on FreeBSD 9.1, and I'm trying to use /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd to
tell me what libraries are needed by libpython2.7.so, a library obtained
from a linux system. But all I get is not a dynamic executable.
In fact, the same thing happens if I run this ldd on a library in
/compat/linux/lib
Hello,
On installing my laptop I did the 1st error and assigned only 512 MByte
to the /root partition; now it turned out (2nd error) that somehow all
/compat/linux stuff ended up in the /root partition:
# du -sh /boot /compat
145M/boot
221M/compat
and I don't even can install a new
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:21:02 +0100, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
Can I safely move the /compat tu /usr/local/compat and do a symlink to
let point /compat -- /usr/local/compat or is there some reason that
linux-f10 ports put all into /compat in root-fs?
I don't see any problem to do
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:21:02 +0100
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
Can I safely move the /compat tu /usr/local/compat and do a symlink to
let point /compat -- /usr/local/compat or is there some reason that
linux-f10 ports put all into /compat in root-fs?
For me /compat was a symlink
Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds like a bogus error to me. I just downgraded amd64 to i386,
reinstalled a linux program and it claims it can't write to ~ now.
I'm running it, and I have no reason to think it wouldn't run as me.
~ is 775 anyway. Also, running the linux program
Sounds like a bogus error to me. I just downgraded amd64 to i386,
reinstalled a linux program and it claims it can't write to ~ now.
I'm running it, and I have no reason to think it wouldn't run as me.
~ is 775 anyway. Also, running the linux program as su or sudo gives
the same error. Any
I installed linux_base-fc4 from Ports. When I use /compat/linux/bin/cp with
option -p, an error occurred.
For example, I type:
$ /compat/linux/bin/cp -p a b
This message is shown:
/compat/linux/bin/cp: preserving times for `b': Bad file descriptor
Does anyone know this?
Thanks
If I cd to /compat/linux/usr/lib, and start nameless linux app, it
runs fine. If I start it from any other location, I get
/usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 : wrong ABI. So the app is finding the
FreeBSD lib instead of the Linux one. I tried putting
/compat/linux/usr/lib at the very front of my path
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Franks wrote:
If I cd to /compat/linux/usr/lib, and start nameless linux app, it
runs fine. If I start it from any other location, I get
/usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 : wrong ABI. So the app is finding the
FreeBSD lib instead of the Linux one
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:11:32 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote:
serafina# dmesg -a | grep -A1 ABI
Additional ABI support:
linux
serafina# /etc/rc.d/abi restart
Additional ABI support: linux.
magic starts here. sorry.
:-)
serafina# /compat/linux/bin/sh
sh-3.00# ls
ls: error
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:39:09 -0700 Steve Franks wrote:
If I cd to /compat/linux/usr/lib, and start nameless linux app, it
runs fine. If I start it from any other location, I get
/usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 : wrong ABI. So the app is finding the
FreeBSD lib instead of the Linux one. I tried
If I cd to /compat/linux/usr/lib, and start nameless linux app, it
runs fine. If I start it from any other location, I get
/usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 : wrong ABI. So the app is finding the
FreeBSD lib instead of the Linux one. I tried putting
/compat/linux/usr/lib at the very front of my path
So my problem is that things are expecting libs in
/usr/compat/linux/lib instead of /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib, and when
they don't find it in linux/lib they go straight to the FreeBSD
version?
So should I be fixing my path, or linking linux/usr/lib to linux/lib, or what?
Steve
On Feb 11, 2008
Written by Michael Ross on 02/11/08 12:42
Am 11.02.2008, 19:26 Uhr, schrieb Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is not finding the FreeBSD versions of libraries. There is no
/usr/lib/librt.so.1 in FreeBSD, that is linux's real-time threading
library. Try brandelf /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib
Am 11.02.2008, 19:26 Uhr, schrieb Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is not finding the FreeBSD versions of libraries. There is no
/usr/lib/librt.so.1 in FreeBSD, that is linux's real-time threading
library. Try brandelf /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/librt.so.1 to see if
it's branded.
[EMAIL
serafina# dmesg -a | grep -A1 ABI
Additional ABI support:
linux
serafina# /etc/rc.d/abi restart
Additional ABI support: linux.
magic starts here. sorry.
serafina# /compat/linux/bin/sh
sh-3.00# ls
ls: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librt.so.1: ELF file OS
ABI invalid
if not set it and rerun /etc/rc.d/abi
serafina# kldload linux
serafina# /etc/rc.d/abi start
Additional ABI support:.
should be
Additional ABI support:linux.
you miss
linux_enable=YES
in rc.conf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
sh-3.00$ ls
ls: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librt.so.1: ELF
file OS ABI invalid
sh-3.00$
Sothat don't seem right. How do I get
/compat/linux/bin/sh to work right? New .shrc file? Something I
missed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /compat/linux/bin/sh
sh
Written by Steve Franks on 02/11/08 13:56
So my problem is that things are expecting libs in
/usr/compat/linux/lib instead of /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib, and when
they don't find it in linux/lib they go straight to the FreeBSD
version?
So should I be fixing my path, or linking linux/usr/lib
Written by Steve Franks on 02/11/08 12:11
I think my problem lies elsewhere: linux abi started, but no
difference! I have the linux .so files right in compat/linux/usr/lib,
but it always finds the freeBSD versions first!
Steve
sh-3.00$ kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 19
I think my problem lies elsewhere: linux abi started, but no
difference! I have the linux .so files right in compat/linux/usr/lib,
but it always finds the freeBSD versions first!
Steve
sh-3.00$ kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 19 0xc040 926ed4 kernel
21 0xc0d27000 5a74
serafina# /etc/rc.d/abi restart
Additional ABI support: linux.
serafina# /compat/linux/bin/sh
sh-3.00# ls
ls: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librt.so.1: ELF file OS
ABI invalid
Michael
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Am 11.02.2008, 18:20 Uhr, schrieb Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
did you have
linux_enable=YES in your rc.conf
if not set it and rerun /etc/rc.d/abi
serafina# kldload linux
serafina# /etc/rc.d/abi start
Additional ABI support:.
serafina# /compat/linux/bin/sh
sh-3.00# ls
ls: error
I think I have a major problem with my linux compatibility. It
started when a third party setup program complained about ELF ABI
types on a shared library, so I did a little experiment:
/compat/linux/bin/sh
sh-3.00$ ls
ls: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librt.so.1: ELF
file OS
Am 11.02.2008, 20:56 Uhr, schrieb Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So should I be fixing my path, or linking linux/usr/lib to linux/lib, or
what?
On Feb 11, 2008 12:06 PM, Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
work around this by linking
/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/librt.so.1 to the actual
Hello,
What is the recommended way for obtaining linux ld binary
(/compat/linux/usr/bin/ld)?
I found in the archives that devel/linux_devel port used to provide it,
but it seems that there is no such port now, except
emulators/linux*-gentoo*.
Thank you,
Nikola Lečić
On 2/10/07, Matt Kitche Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi list,
I'm starting off a new job where I'll be forced to work in a GNU/Linux
environment, and I thought that maybe there exists some way to just
chroot in /compat/linux and have a complete GNU/Linux environment
in /compat/linux and have a complete GNU/Linux environment at
disposal, without the need for a dual booting setup.
yes I chroot into /compat/linux all the time just make sure that you
kldload linux first to make sure it's loaded first.
Yes, thanx. The problem is that just chroot'ing
Hi list,
I'm starting off a new job where I'll be forced to work in a GNU/Linux
environment, and I thought that maybe there exists some way to just
chroot in /compat/linux and have a complete GNU/Linux environment at
disposal, without the need for a dual booting setup.
Any experiences or advices
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi list,
I'm starting off a new job where I'll be forced to work in a GNU/Linux
environment, and I thought that maybe there exists some way to just
chroot in /compat/linux and have a complete GNU/Linux environment at
disposal, without the need for a dual booting setup.
Any
I looked at a few of the emulator/linux* ports, and it was not in
their pkg-plist files, only something in their usr/sbin
(glibc_post_upgrad), which, when ran, does not generate a glibc that I
can find in the any of BSDs lib directories, or the compat/linux/lib,
compat/linux/usr/lib either
I looked at a few of the emulator/linux* ports, and it was not in
their pkg-plist files, only something in their usr/sbin
(glibc_post_upgrad), which, when ran, does not generate a glibc that I
can find in the any of BSDs lib directories, or the compat/linux/lib,
compat/linux/usr/lib either
in their usr/sbin
(glibc_post_upgrad), which, when ran, does not generate a glibc that I
can find in the any of BSDs lib directories, or the compat/linux/lib,
compat/linux/usr/lib either.
$ grep ^lib/libc /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8/pkg-plist
lib/libc-2.3.2.so
lib/libc.so.6
lib/libcrypt
/linux* ports, and it was not in
their pkg-plist files, only something in their usr/sbin
(glibc_post_upgrad), which, when ran, does not generate a glibc that I
can find in the any of BSDs lib directories, or the compat/linux/lib,
compat/linux/usr/lib either.
$ grep ^lib/libc /usr/ports
]'
/opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
My compile and link contains the -L/compat/linux/lib. This contains
all of the libraries from adding the linux_base port.
I dont know where to even start trying to figure out which files the
GLIBC references should
Hi,
I've gone ahead and installed linux_base-8 on 6.0 RELEASE. What I'd like
to know is how are devices handled? For example, and this is crucial to
my application, is it possible for a linux application to talk to /dev/st0,
and if so how is this accomplished with no /compat/linux/dev directory
is this accomplished with no
/compat/linux/dev directory and with devfs in operation?
I'd make a symlink from /compat/linux/dev/st0 to /dev/sa0 . That'll
work if you just want to read/write a tape. You can't do any fancy
stuff like setting densities or block positioning, since the ioctls are
different
I am running 6-STABLE from Dec 27 2005; mortal user shell is zsh
4.2.6; root shell is bash [23]; have reinstalled all the ports that i
currently want/need.
Short story is that without pointing '/compat/linux' to
'/usr/linux-base', i could not run acroread7, instead got the
following message
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please give me clue..
When you do the install of the base, the port-message at the very end
tells you to create it. You enter
Richard Verwayen wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 13:43 +0700 schrieb Muhammad Reza:
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please give me clue..
Issueing 'kldload linprocfs' may solve your problem...
RIchard
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please give me clue..
When you do the install of the base, the port-message at the very end
tells you
On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:21 am, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please give me clue..
When you do the install
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:21 am, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please give me clue
Muhammad Reza wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:21 am, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:43 pm, Muhammad Reza wrote:
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please
Dear List..
Why I didnt have /usr/compat/linux/proc on my 5.4 Release with
linux_base package installed ?
please give me clue..
regards
reza
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Thanks Dan .. i include the line in my /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf and works whitout
problem
In the last episode (Mar 01), Osmany Guirola Cruz said:
I am runing vmd for linux in my freebsd box when i try to run the vmd
it give me theses errors libX**.so.6 not shuch file or directory then
i
I am runing vmd for linux in my freebsd box when i try to run the vmd it give me
theses errors libX**.so.6 not shuch file or directory then i installed the
linux-Xfree86-libs and the program give me the same error. and the files of these port
are in the /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/ but when i
of these port are in the
/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/ but when i copy the lib*.so.6 from here
to /compat/linux/usr/lib the vmd works without problem.. WHY? What
should i do to remediate these little problem ?
Make sure /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf contains the line
/usr/X11R6/lib
, and then reboot
's:Linux):FreeBSD|Linux):g' /usr/local/Acrobat5/bin/acroread
/compat/linux/usr/bin/strip:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1 (ignored)
[...]
All gets installed anyway; but any idea how come this message is generated?
Is something missing in linux-base 7,1-5 ?
I checked:
$ file
(which worked perfectly under 4.6-R w/linux_base-6.1)
now complains when asked to start:
ELF interpreter /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 not found
Abort
Of course, linux_base-7.1_1 doesn't reference ld-linux.so.1,
so what's up with that ?!
And the 4.7-R distribution come with linux_base-6,
so going
Hello
I was able to get older linux binaries to work by install the following
rpms from the Red Hat 6.1 distribution:
ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm
libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm
I did this by:
# /usr/compat/linux/bin/bash
# rpm -ivh ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm
# rpm -ivh libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm
Then you
I was able to get older linux binaries to work by install the following
rpms from the Red Hat 6.1 distribution:
ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm
libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm
I did this by:
# /usr/compat/linux/bin/bash
# rpm -ivh ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm
# rpm -ivh libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm
Then you
!I was able to get older linux binaries to work by install the following
!rpms from the Red Hat 6.1 distribution:
!
!ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm
!libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm
!
!I did this by:
!# /usr/compat/linux/bin/bash
!# rpm -ivh ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm
!# rpm -ivh libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm
!
!Then you
53 matches
Mail list logo
