Re: compatibility SCO

2013-05-12 Thread Marco Steinbach
On Thu, 9 May 2013, grillo wrote: I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary compatibility ? environment compatibility ? thank you You're probably forced to stay with MS Cobol for reasons b

Re: compatibility SCO (fwd)

2013-05-12 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, cc questions@ was dropped so restoring Forwarded from: "Julian Stacey" http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/ --- Forwarded Message >From gri...@goldnet.it Sun May 12 09:15:13 2013 Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 09:12:53 +0200 From: grillo To: "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: com

Re: compatibility SCO

2013-05-11 Thread Julian H. Stacey
grillo wrote: > I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for > Xenix/Unix system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have > binary compatibility ? environment compatibility ? > thank you A long time since I looked at this, but as no one else answered y

Re: compatibility SCO

2013-05-09 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
2013/5/9 grillo > I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix > system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary > compatibility ? environment compatibility ? > thank you > > __**_ &

compatibility SCO

2013-05-09 Thread grillo
I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary compatibility ? environment compatibility ? thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

SDXC compatibility

2012-11-06 Thread Da Rock
Not to bug people, but is there support for sdxc in any version of FBSD? (9.x would be nice :) ) I understand it is mostly in the fs (exfat), and as such there is a fuse module for it, but I'm concerned at a hardware/driver level- namely speeds. Any light on what happens when one uses a fs other

RE: harware compatibility queustion

2012-08-24 Thread Graeme Dargie
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bonomi Sent: 24 August 2012 03:30 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: harware compatibility queustion I need to add "more than two' int

Re: harware compatibility queustion

2012-08-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 23), Robert Bonomi said: > I need to add "more than two' internal SATA _ports_ to a box that will be > running FreeBSD 9. > > When I look at inexpensive SATA controllers, they all seem to be using > chipsets thar are _not_ explicitly mentioned in the 'supported hardware' >

harware compatibility queustion

2012-08-23 Thread Robert Bonomi
I need to add "more than two' internal SATA _ports_ to a box that will be running FreeBSD 9. When I look at inexpensive SATA controllers, they all seem to be using chipsets thar are _not_ explicitly mentioned in the 'supported hardware' list. Can anyone say, authoritatively, that, say, a 'SiL

Re: FreeBSD compatibility with HP ProLiant DL360p Generation 8 (Gen8) ?

2012-06-14 Thread Rick Miller
Reply inline... On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Olivier Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > I need to order a few more servers for an internal project, and instead > of the usual DL360G7 we now use without any problem with FreeBSD, there > would now be the next generation, called "Gen8". > > Intel® C600

FreeBSD compatibility with HP ProLiant DL360p Generation 8 (Gen8) ?

2012-06-14 Thread Olivier Mueller
Hello, I need to order a few more servers for an internal project, and instead of the usual DL360G7 we now use without any problem with FreeBSD, there would now be the next generation, called "Gen8". Intel® C600 Series Chipset Intel® E5-2600 Processor Family Storage Controller : HP Smart Array P

Re: compatibility

2012-05-25 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri May 25 10:25:21 2012 > From: "Philippe Combier" > To: > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:22:52 +0200 > Cc: > Subject: compatibility > > Hello ! > I have a Samsung portable with an Intel Atom cpu N450 . In http://w

Re: compatibility

2012-05-25 Thread doug
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Philippe Combier wrote: Hello ! I have a Samsung portable with an Intel Atom cpu N450 . In http://www.freebsd.org/fr/where.html , you specify ?versions & platform ? and I cannot locate the type of processor of my Samsung .What choice do I do ? Thank you very much for

compatibility

2012-05-25 Thread Philippe Combier
Hello ! I have a Samsung portable with an Intel Atom cpu N450 . In http://www.freebsd.org/fr/where.html , you specify “versions & platform “ and I cannot locate the type of processor of my Samsung .What choice do I do ? Thank you very much for the answer

Re: Network Cards Compatibility

2012-05-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes with most PC's? i think making list of incompatible network cards would be far easier. since a very long time i just never checked as everything

Re: Network Cards Compatibility

2012-05-17 Thread Daniel Feenberg
mited selection? You would do better to post a list of the cards available to you and ask what will work. I have purchased many very inexpensive (<$10) NICs and never had a compatibility problem with whatever was the latest FreeBSD version available at the time, although very expensive cards,

Re: Network Cards Compatibility

2012-05-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 17/05/2012 16:11, Christian ROUSSEAU wrote: > I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible > network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes > with most PC's? Realtek cards generally use the re(4) driver: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man

Re: Network Cards Compatibility

2012-05-17 Thread Robert Bonomi
"Christian ROUSSEAU" writes: > > Greetings, > > I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible > network cards. You have my permission. *grin* See : Fint the O/S version you are interested in and select the 'Hardware Notes' link. Select the category of device

FW: Network Cards Compatibility

2012-05-17 Thread Christian ROUSSEAU
Greetings, I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes with most PC's? THx ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Network Cards Compatibility

2012-05-17 Thread Christian ROUSSEAU
Greetings, I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes with most PC's? THx ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: boinc setiathome enhanced and CUDA compatibility

2012-03-23 Thread David Whytcross
thanks Robert, I hadn't thought to do that, but will give it a go Dave Whytcross - Original Message - From: "Robert Huff" To: "David Whytcross" Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 5:01 AM Subject: boinc setiathome enhanced and CUDA compatibility Davi

boinc setiathome enhanced and CUDA compatibility

2012-03-23 Thread Robert Huff
David Whytcross writes: > my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card > > is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into > boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 Have you asked the port maintainer? Robert Huff ___

boinc setiathome enhanced and CUDA compatibility

2012-03-23 Thread David Whytcross
Hi Guys, my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 regards, Dave Whytcross ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-22 Thread Da Rock
On 02/23/12 11:57, Da Rock wrote: On 02/23/12 08:33, Jerry wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:10 +1000 Da Rock articulated: The most annoying for me was when they're running Win7 (blah!) and I was trying to burn a cd _and_ keep the kids from interrupting by playing on the keyboard. I closed the

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-22 Thread Da Rock
On 02/23/12 08:33, Jerry wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:10 +1000 Da Rock articulated: The most annoying for me was when they're running Win7 (blah!) and I was trying to burn a cd _and_ keep the kids from interrupting by playing on the keyboard. I closed the lid like I do with FBSD and it susp

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-22 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:10 +1000 Da Rock articulated: > The most annoying for me was when they're running Win7 (blah!) and I > was trying to burn a cd _and_ keep the kids from interrupting by > playing on the keyboard. I closed the lid like I do with FBSD and it > suspended! Grr! That behavior

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-21 Thread Da Rock
On 02/22/12 09:19, Polytropon wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:44:08 +1000, Da Rock wrote: On 02/22/12 01:44, Polytropon wrote: Today's problems seem to be suspend/resume/hibernate (all the variations of "it's not switched on, but also not switched off entirely") and some specific sorts of wireles

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-21 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:44:08 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/22/12 01:44, Polytropon wrote: > > Today's problems seem to be suspend/resume/hibernate (all > > the variations of "it's not switched on, but also not > > switched off entirely") and some specific sorts of wireless > > devices. > I've never

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-21 Thread Da Rock
On 02/22/12 01:44, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:45:05 +1000, Da Rock wrote: To the OP, check the pages Polytropon has linked here, but the chances of getting exactly that are nil to impossible. I've run about 6 or more laptops now without too much trouble. The biggest problems were w

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-21 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:45:05 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > To the OP, check the pages Polytropon has linked here, but the chances > of getting exactly that are nil to impossible. I've run about 6 or more > laptops now without too much trouble. The biggest problems were > wireless, but that was the bad

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-20 Thread Da Rock
you either tell me which hardware are suitable or a link to a compatibility list? Check the hardware compatibility list to find out which devices are compatible to FreeBSD, also see the release notes regarding version 9.0 of the OS. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/hardware.

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-20 Thread Polytropon
me which hardware are suitable or a link to a > compatibility list? Check the hardware compatibility list to find out which devices are compatible to FreeBSD, also see the release notes regarding version 9.0 of the OS. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/hardware.html http://www.freebsd.org/re

Re: Hardware compatibility

2012-02-20 Thread Roland Smith
of the box. The best way to check is to take a LiveCD to the store and ask if you can boot the laptop that you'd like from that. > Could you either tell me which hardware are suitable or a link to a > compatibility list? GIYF: http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/ Roland -- R.F.Smith

Hardware compatibility

2012-02-20 Thread Riccardo Garzelli
Dear Information service I was thinking of purchasing a new laptop and I wanted to go for FreeBSD OS. Unfortunately I'm no brainer in Unix so I'd like to find a PC that can run FreeBSD 9.0 out of the box. Could you either tell me which hardware are suitable or a link to a compatib

Re: Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread Joshua Isom
On 2/13/2012 11:52 AM, sie...@email.de wrote: Hello, On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:22:15 - Dave wrote: Don't you have to install/load a module for Linux binary compatability to work in F'BSD? I seem to remember that being mentioned during a recent 8.something install. I have load the kernel mod

Re: Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread sie...@email.de
Hello, On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:22:15 - Dave wrote: > Don't you have to install/load a module for Linux binary compatability to > work in F'BSD? I seem to remember that being mentioned during a recent > 8.something install. I have load the kernel module with boot. freebsd-desk# cat /etc/rc

Re: Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread siefke_lis...@web.de
Hello, On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:47:07 + Matthew Seaman wrote: > The undefined symbol errors suggest that the OP is missing some > important linux shlibs which should be installed in > /compat/linux/usr/lib -- what linuxbase port have you installed, and > what distro did you obtain those linux ex

Re: Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 13/02/2012 12:22, Dave wrote: > On 13 Feb 2012 at 21:01, Da Rock wrote: > >> On 02/13/12 20:08, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the. >>> Brandelf was applied to the binaries. But any Linux application >>> crashes at star

Re: Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread Dave
On 13 Feb 2012 at 21:01, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/13/12 20:08, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the. > > Brandelf was applied to the binaries. But any Linux application > > crashes at startup. > > > > freebsd-desk# kldstat > >

Re: Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread Da Rock
On 02/13/12 20:08, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the. Brandelf was applied to the binaries. But any Linux application crashes at startup. freebsd-desk# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 1 21 0xc040 8c6d08 kernel 2

Linux compatibility

2012-02-13 Thread siefke_lis...@web.de
Hello, I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the. Brandelf was applied to the binaries. But any Linux application crashes at startup. freebsd-desk# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 1 21 0xc040 8c6d08 kernel 21 0xc0cc7000 4864 sem.ko 31 0xc41eb000

Re: Need to know the compatibility

2011-12-29 Thread Mark Blackman
On 29 Dec 2011, at 15:45, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, vijayamurugan.kalyanasunda...@emc.com wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Kindly let me know on the compatibility of " Intel X520 Dual Port 10 Gigabit >> Ethernet PCIe Adaptor Card

Re: Need to know the compatibility

2011-12-29 Thread Daniel Feenberg
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, vijayamurugan.kalyanasunda...@emc.com wrote: Hi Team, Kindly let me know on the compatibility of " Intel X520 Dual Port 10 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe Adaptor Card " with Free BSD 8.2 OS. I didn't see any answer to this - but we are interested in ANY 10 G

Need to know the compatibility

2011-12-19 Thread Vijayamurugan.Kalyanasundaram
Hi Team, Kindly let me know on the compatibility of " Intel X520 Dual Port 10 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe Adaptor Card " with Free BSD 8.2 OS. This is an urgent requirement for our development project. Please provide us the information at the earliest. Thanks & Regards, Vijay K E

RE: Linux Binary Compatibility: Libpam compile for FreeBSD

2011-08-01 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi Boris (apologies for top-posting) Thanks, I had to go this way in the end. My process was: 1. enable linux binary compatibility on freebsd. 2. build a debian chroot environment using debootstrap 3. obtain some binaries that I could not find in the debian package repos by extracting

Re: Linux Binary Compatibility: Libpam compile for FreeBSD

2011-08-01 Thread Boris Samorodov
d > with linux binary compatibility enabled in the ports tree either. > Would anyone know if there is a freebsd port of linux libpam, or a > source package I could easily compile for freebsd 7.3 and upward ? > Informational: The binary I'm trying to run is "wmic" , a wi

Linux Binary Compatibility: Libpam compile for FreeBSD

2011-08-01 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi List I need to run a linux binary on freebsd 7.3 that expects to link to libpam.so.0. I can't seem to find how to compile libpam (linux-pam) on freebsd, or locate some kind of compatible binary I can run on freebsd with linux binary compatibility enabled in the ports tree either.

Re: FreeBSD' Webcam and DVB Compatibility List

2011-04-02 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <20110331112119.ga21...@sh4-5.1blu.de> you write: >Hello, Hi! > >We have started a small documentation project in the FreeBSD Wiki: The >FreeBSD' Webcam and DVB Compatibility List. > >http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat > >The main goal of this pa

FreeBSD' Webcam and DVB Compatibility List

2011-03-31 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, We have started a small documentation project in the FreeBSD Wiki: The FreeBSD' Webcam and DVB Compatibility List. http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat The main goal of this page is to give an exact answer about which application works with a given cam or DVB. Combinatio

Re: linux PF_PACKET compatibility

2011-01-31 Thread Da Rock
On 01/31/11 20:22, b. f. wrote: Da Rock wrote: ... I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx. anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first. Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659 I looked up man socket and I can

Re: linux PF_PACKET compatibility

2011-01-31 Thread b. f.
Da Rock wrote: ... > I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx. > anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first. > Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659 > > I looked up man socket and I can see possibilities (in my mind

linux PF_PACKET compatibility

2011-01-30 Thread Da Rock
"In recent versions of the Linux kernel (post-2.0 releases) a new protocol family has been introduced, named PF_PACKET. This family allows an application to send and receive packets dealing directly with the network card driver, thus avoiding the usual protocol stack-handling (e.g., IP/TCP or I

Re: CPIO compatibility with Freebsd 8[.1]

2010-11-11 Thread Wojciech Puchar
'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/__init__.pyo' usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/__init__.pyc: Can't create 'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/__init__.pyc' usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.py: Can't create 'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.py' usr

CPIO compatibility with Freebsd 8[.1]

2010-11-10 Thread Pico Geyer
/distutils/tests/support.pyo' usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.pyc: Can't create 'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.pyc' [snip] Does anyone know why this might be happening? Are there compatibility changes with cpio? Any advice would be appreciate

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-10-01 Thread Kaya Saman
Many thanks for the responses! On 01/10/2010 02:52, Paul Wootton wrote: On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote: On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: Kaya Saman wrote: From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Paul Wootton
On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote: On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: Kaya Saman wrote: From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written to all the time. You can skip swap altogether and

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Nathan Vidican
MFS == memory filesystem; aka ram-disk. The problem being that on reboot, MFS looses all its contents, therefore practices like storing the 'startup' state for a filesystem in an archive (tar file works well) and mounting/copying on startup works well. Conversely, if you need to modify that startup

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Brent Bloxam
Kaya Saman wrote: From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written to all the time. You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like Brian mentioned for other high write partition

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Kaya Saman
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: Kaya Saman wrote: From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written to all the time. You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like Bria

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Kaya Saman
Thanks very much Brian: On 30/09/2010 17:02, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote: On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote: I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use compact flash as storage?? For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these days) s

Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)
On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote: I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use compact flash as storage?? For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these days) systems with CF images off of flash, keep a shadow copy of /etc around, and progra

Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server

2010-09-30 Thread Kaya Saman
Hi, I'm planning on using FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE edition for a small primary/secondary DNS server setup. The system will run Bind9 and have some zone files and views for the few people I host for. I am considering using a dual Atom system board with 2GB RAM and for storage was thinking of

Re: Text mode screen size max. compatibility

2010-07-23 Thread Polytropon
Chuck, Dan, Andrew, this is exactly what I was looking for. The manpages of resozeterm and the mentioning of KEY_RESIZE in getch()'s input queue gives a good solution to call a specific function when in any input loop. The needed information about the new screen dimensions can then easily be obtai

Re: Text mode screen size max. compatibility

2010-07-23 Thread Chuck Swiger
Yes-- On Jul 23, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Polytropon wrote: > Cool - I planned to use (n)curses anyway. But one question remains: > Is there an "interrupt line" (or something functionally similar, > a flag or whatever) that will give the chance for a notification > if LINES or COLS has recently changed,

Re: Text mode screen size max. compatibility

2010-07-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 23), Polytropon said: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:44:27 -0300 (ADT), "A. Wright" wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Polytropon wrote: > > > Is there a way to easily determine the terminal output size at program > > > startup so the program can be preconfigured for certain s

Re: Text mode screen size max. compatibility

2010-07-23 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:44:27 -0300 (ADT), "A. Wright" wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Polytropon wrote: > > > Is there a way to easily determine the terminal output size at > > program startup so the program can be preconfigured for certain > > screen sizes, and even refuse to run if it's less t

Re: Text mode screen size max. compatibility

2010-07-23 Thread A. Wright
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Polytropon wrote: Is there a way to easily determine the terminal output size at program startup so the program can be preconfigured for certain screen sizes, and even refuse to run if it's less than 80x25? The "curses" library will do this. The variables LINES and COLS

Text mode screen size max. compatibility

2010-07-23 Thread Polytropon
if we're in text or in X, but how to get more information about what terminal output size is currently set in X? Oh, and the program will be written in C. Due to maximum compatibility, I want to try to keep the program in text mode (so it's easier to use it via SSH with no X server pres

Re: Dell workstation / server Freebsd's compatibility

2010-06-27 Thread doug
d run their DSET tool. If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems. If you want general compatibility that generally works better than any OEM, use general parts from newegg, etc. iXsystems is the exception because they test and support BSD on the parts they sell. iXsystems prod

Re: Dell workstation / server Freebsd's compatibility

2010-06-27 Thread Jerry
ll won't give you any operating system support, > but they will honor your hardware warranties just fine. We've had > various failures that were replaced with very little hassle from > Dell. The most trouble they will give you is if it's an obscure > issue, in which case

Re: Dell workstation / server Freebsd's compatibility

2010-06-26 Thread Steve Polyack
fine. We've had various failures that were replaced with very little hassle from Dell. The most trouble they will give you is if it's an obscure issue, in which case they'll ask you to boot Linux and run their DSET tool. If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems. I

Re: Dell workstation / server Freebsd's compatibility

2010-06-26 Thread Al Plant
Olivier GARNIER wrote: Hi, I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it (http/samba/ 4 disk on RAID) It's summer time and the old workstation will not work at the end the summer time (too warm for it) So ii wish to change it. I don't need a big server, a tiny workstat

Re: Dell workstation / server Freebsd's compatibility

2010-06-26 Thread Tim Judd
you will with Dell or any other OEM. Moreover, you won't get support from Dell or an OEM for support issues, including hardware replacements because they didn't sell the machine with BSD. If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems. If you want general compatibility that g

Dell workstation / server Freebsd's compatibility

2010-06-26 Thread Olivier GARNIER
Hi, I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it (http/samba/ 4 disk on RAID) It's summer time and the old workstation will not work at the end the summer time (too warm for it) So ii wish to change it. I don't need a big server, a tiny workstation will be enough. I wi

Re: debian compatibility

2010-05-27 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Jim Pazarena wrote: can I please be directed to any on-line reference as the procedures involved in executing a Debian binary on FreeBSD 8? Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/linuxemu.html HTH, KDK ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.or

Re: debian compatibility

2010-05-26 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:44:36 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote: > can I please be directed to any on-line reference as the > procedures involved in executing a Debian binary on FreeBSD 8? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/linuxemu.html Basically see 10.2 (next page). -- Polytropon Magdebur

debian compatibility

2010-05-26 Thread Jim Pazarena
can I please be directed to any on-line reference as the procedures involved in executing a Debian binary on FreeBSD 8? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, sen

Intel DG45FC Fly Creek LGA 775 Mini-ITX system board compatibility?

2010-05-17 Thread Kaya Saman
Hi, I'd just like to know if the Intel DG45FC Fly Creek LGA 775 Mini-ITX system board is compatible with FreeBSD and also if there is a PCIe SATA card recommendation too as I need more SATA ports?? I plan on building a Mini-ITX based NAS/Server using a Chenbro hot-swap chassis with FreeBSD 8

Hardware Compatibility

2010-05-06 Thread David emmel
Hello all, I have a quick question about server hardware compatibility. We're looking to buy a replacement server and the HP ProLiant DL320 G6 E5502 was listed as a possible option. http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06b/15351-15351-3328412-241644-241475-3929672-3942218-3942219

4K compatibility

2010-03-16 Thread Jerry
I just ran across an article that states that through the International Disk Drive Equipment and Materials Association (Idema) all hard drive makers have committed to adopting the 4K advanced format by the end of January 2011. Later in the article: Windows 7, Vista, OS X Tiger, Leopard, Snow Leop

Re: unabe to install linux compatibility on freebsd 8.0-R

2010-02-21 Thread John
at the start that I was using a custom kernel. I was also having a problem with rar out of the ports - it gave a similar error to the kldstat. So I did this: /usr/local/bin/rar: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), statically linked, for FreeBSD 7.0 (700055), stripped an

Re: unabe to install linux compatibility on freebsd 8.0-R

2010-02-21 Thread John
Hi, thanks for replying On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote: > > Somehow your linux.ko is broken, do you perhaps have WITHOUT_LINUX= > in /etc/src.conf or /etc/make.conf? I have no src.conf make.conf looks like this: $ cat /etc/make.conf | less CPUTYPE?=athlon64 W

Re: unabe to install linux compatibility on freebsd 8.0-R

2010-02-20 Thread Pieter de Goeje
_http.ko > 111 0x80a5b000 1ce accf_data.ko > > If I try to install the linux port: > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 > # make > ===> linux_base-f10-10_2 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/l

unabe to install linux compatibility on freebsd 8.0-R

2010-02-20 Thread John
inux_base-f10-10_2 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10. Finally, if I try to install compatibility in the kernel, I get the error unknown option "COMPAT_LINUX" at the config phase. Can anyone help me please? # uname -p -r 8.0-RELEA

Re: Backward compatibility libraries?

2010-01-23 Thread John
FreeBSD4 > > > > yet, when I try to run a program compiled on the FreeBSD 4.3 system on > > the new system, I get > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found, required by > > "pipetype" > > > > So - there

Re: Backward compatibility libraries?

2010-01-23 Thread Roland Smith
system on > the new system, I get > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found, required by > "pipetype" > > So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've > looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't se

Re: Backward compatibility libraries?

2010-01-23 Thread Morgan Wesström
usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found, required by > "pipetype" > > So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've > looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what I'm > looking for (pr

Backward compatibility libraries?

2010-01-23 Thread John
bc.so.4" not found, required by "pipetype" So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what I'm looking for (probably looking right at it). What am I missing? Thanks!

Re: Linux compatibility in FreeBSD

2009-10-14 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:57:58 -0300 Leandro F Silva wrote: > Does anyone know or already configured the linux compatibility in FreeBSD to > install rpm packages and so on. hm, actually (almost) all linux applications are installed using RPM packages. Did you mean using linux RPM da

Linux compatibility in FreeBSD

2009-10-14 Thread Leandro F Silva
Dears, Does anyone know or already configured the linux compatibility in FreeBSD to install rpm packages and so on. Actually I'm running the i386 7.2 FreeBSD and the following package. %pkg_info |grep linu linux_base-fc-4_14 Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) I al

Compatibility of motherboard Asus KFSN5-D

2009-06-30 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, I would like to build a FreeBSD 7.2 server on the motherboard Asus KFSN5-D. It looks like the chipset is nVIDIA nForce Professional 3600, I don't see it being supported (or not). Before I engage in buying, I would like to make sure I'll have no problem. TIA, Olivier ___

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:34:44 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > I see, can you tell me which are FC4 ports?? thanks!! Please, reread my previous email. I wrote _all_ linux ports. > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > >

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
I see, can you tell me which are FC4 ports?? thanks!! TFC On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > > Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 > Accessibility > > Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fed

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 Accessibility > Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fedora 8) > linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14_1 Vector graphics library Cairo (Linux Fedora 8) > linux-f8-curl-7.18.2_1 The command line too

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
It's funny, sometimes I think portmaster knows that it should upgrade linux-f8* ports and not linux-* ports but sometimes doesn't. I don't know why... TFC On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 > Accessibility Toolk

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 Accessibility Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fedora 8) linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14_1 Vector graphics library Cairo (Linux Fedora 8) linux-f8-curl-7.18.2_1 The command line tool for transferring files with URL synta linux-f8-expat-2.0.1_1 L

Re: linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:15:21 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi, Just use portmaster to upgrade ports and found out a lot of linux-* > ports are renewed. But strange to see that upgrading was interrupted by > ports conflicts, such as linux-f8-tiff and linux-tiff. Yes, those ports install files with

linux compatibility ports upgrade

2009-06-04 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
Hi, Just use portmaster to upgrade ports and found out a lot of linux-* ports are renewed. But strange to see that upgrading was interrupted by ports conflicts, such as linux-f8-tiff and linux-tiff. What I have are a whole bunch of f8 stuff, I dont understand why portmaster choose to upgrade port

Re: filesystem compatibility between FreeBSD and OpenBSD

2009-04-30 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:11:28 -0600, Tim Judd wrote: > It's funny that OpenBSD's manpage says it uses FFS, not UFS -- when even I > thought it said UFS before I looked it up. Don't FFS and UFS refer to the same file system, the Berkeley Fast File System, also known as 4.2bsd? In my "studies" accor

Re: filesystem compatibility between FreeBSD and OpenBSD

2009-04-30 Thread Tim Judd
something I wonder about I know OpenBSD and FreeBSD both have different versions of the "UFS" filesystems (FreeBSD newfs(8) -O option, OpenBSD newfs(8) -O) has someone tried to use all combinations of all options to see if they work? It's funny that OpenBSD's manpage says it uses FFS, not UF

  1   2   3   4   >