Hi,
Followed those and recompiled. Precisely the same issue :-(
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:10:54 +0200
> Chris Knipe articulated:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been battling the whole day now trying to compile 9 STABLE
>> I've svn'ed the source from br
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:10:54 +0200
Chris Knipe articulated:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been battling the whole day now trying to compile 9 STABLE
> I've svn'ed the source from branch base/stable/9 numerious times and
> the code base as far as I can tell is up to date...
>
> cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/
27.06.2013 17:10, Chris Knipe написав(ла):
Hi all,
I've been battling the whole day now trying to compile 9 STABLE
I've svn'ed the source from branch base/stable/9 numerious times and
the code base as far as I can tell is up to date...
As me. As I reported my local glitches in the past I p
Hi all,
I've been battling the whole day now trying to compile 9 STABLE
I've svn'ed the source from branch base/stable/9 numerious times and
the code base as far as I can tell is up to date...
cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/../../../contr
Tommy Pham writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
>> install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
>> compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire, NI
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
> install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
> compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire, NICs) kernel of 9.1 p3
> and wi
Hi everyone,
I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire, NICs) kernel of 9.1 p3
and without lib32 support. I only needed SATA disk and em NIC support.
Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:01:25 +, Will Parsons wrote:
>
>> I've recently installed 9.1-RELEASE on a laptop and am in the process of
>> installing the ports that I want. On several now, I've encountered
>> error messages that I don't know how to deal with and for which I don
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:01:25 +, Will Parsons wrote:
> I've recently installed 9.1-RELEASE on a laptop and am in the process of
> installing the ports that I want. On several now, I've encountered
> error messages that I don't know how to deal with and for which I don't
> see anything in the U
I've recently installed 9.1-RELEASE on a laptop and am in the process
of installing the ports that I want. On several now, I've encountered
error messages that I don't know how to deal with and for which I
don't see anything in the UPDATING file that seems to be relevant.
For example, trying to bu
David Banning wrote:
That doesn't look like a problem with mplayer per se, rather with your
GTK or XRANDR install.
I wonder if these two versions of gtk could represent a problem;
This should be fine, 1.x and 2.x can coexist. Scim is unrelated, it's
the Linux input engine.
The linker comman
> That doesn't look like a problem with mplayer per se, rather with your
> GTK or XRANDR install.
I wonder if these two versions of gtk could represent a problem;
[root@3s1 ~]# cd /var/db/pkg
[root@3s1 /var/db/pkg]# ls -tld *gtk*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 12 17:40 gtk-2.22.1_1
drwxr-xr-
Hi,
David Banning wrote:
getting this error on compile of mplayer;
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to
`XRRGetScreenResourcesCurrent'
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XRRGetOutputPrimary'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake: *** [mplayer] Err
getting this error on compile of mplayer;
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to
`XRRGetScreenResourcesCurrent'
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XRRGetOutputPrimary'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake: *** [mplayer] Error 1
*** Error code 1
Stop
On 06/01/12 00:00, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an err
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
> WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
>
> When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
>
> I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
>
> If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
>
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG="Yes"
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
this.
If I use 'make MK_CLANG_IS_CC="no"' the port compiles.
How do I fix this
_gahn
- Original Message -
From: Sergey Kandaurov
To: gahn
Cc: free bsd ; freebsd general questions
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: compiling glib20 failed
On 4 April 2012 07:02, gahn wrote:
> hi gurus:
>
> i got problem with compiling glib20:
>
>
On 4 April 2012 07:02, gahn wrote:
> hi gurus:
>
> i got problem with compiling glib20:
>
> ===> glib-2.28.8_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 - found
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/liblzma.so.5: version XZ_5.0 required by
> /usr/bin/xz not defined
Hi,
when did you update your ports tree?
It works here on 8.3 with a ports tree from last week.
Erich
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:02:51 gahn wrote:
> hi gurus:
>
> i got problem with compiling glib20:
>
> ===> glib-2.28.8_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 - f
hi gurus:
i got problem with compiling glib20:
===> glib-2.28.8_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 - found
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/liblzma.so.5: version XZ_5.0 required by
/usr/bin/xz not defined
===> Missing license file for LGPL20 in
/usr/ports/devel/glib2
nabble.com/Problem-compiling-emulators-virtualbox-ose-kmod-4-1-8-2-tp5561048p5597254.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
Bernhard Froehlich writes:
> Pointyhat has triggered the same compile error so it is real. Probably
> avg has a clue how to fix it.
A (quick) look at pointyhat only shows me amd64 errors.
My main build server (on amd64, building for i386 and amd64) doesn't see
those problems, and neither does
On Wednesday 21 March 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > /data1/tmp/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-
> >4.1.10/out/freebsd.x86/
> >
> > release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/memobj-r0drv-fr
> downloaded a fresh copy of the
> port (4.1.10) from the FreeBSD website but still get the same problem when
> compiling.
>
> /data1/tmp/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.1.10/out/freebsd.x86/
>
On Friday 16 March 2012, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Mike Clarke
wrote:
> > in
> > /data1/tmp/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-
> >4.1.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv.
> >
> > I ran portsnap immediately before portmaster so my por
0) from the FreeBSD website but still get the same problem when
compiling.
/data1/tmp/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.1.10/out/freebsd.x86/
release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/m
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
>
> in
> /data1/tmp/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.1.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv.
>
> I ran portsnap immediately before portmaster so my ports are up to date.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
Did you follow the
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> Mike Clarke writes:
>
>> portmaster -a fails with:
>>
>> cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-mp -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0
>> -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -w -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING
>> -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DRT_ARCH_X86 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
>> -nos
Mike Clarke writes:
> portmaster -a fails with:
>
> cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-mp -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0
> -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -w -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING
> -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DRT_ARCH_X86 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
> -nostdinc -Iinclude -I. -Ir0drv -I. -
portmaster -a fails with:
cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-mp -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 -DIN_SUP_R0
-DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -w -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS
-DRT_ARCH_X86 -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -Iinclude -I. -Ir0drv
-I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limi
M, Da Rock <
>>> > > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
;> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
>&g
> >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
> > > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8
ti...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fa
ti...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fa
y Wodfer wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> >>>
> >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
compiling. I
> >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
> >>> inst
t;>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
>>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
>>> installed
>>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
>>>
>>> Heres
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>
>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
>>
>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
>>
On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is installed
from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is installed
from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
Heres what I do:
./configure
gmak
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
>>> ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
>>> portmaster x11-wm/xfce4-wm
>>>
>>>
>>> Any ideas, pointers/advice/suggestions?
>>>
>>
>> See /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20120116
>>
>> --
>> --
>
> It is not t
>> ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
>> portmaster x11-wm/xfce4-wm
>>
>>
>> Any ideas, pointers/advice/suggestions?
>>
>
> See /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20120116
>
> --
> --
It is not there, there is onlyone for 20120109, none for 20120116 :(
Thanks,
Anto
On 16 January 2012 22:59, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> I am trying to update all ports and have encountered xfce4-wm failing
> to compile. I used
> # portmaster -a -x xfce4-wm
> to bypass the failure.
. . .
> CCLD xfwm4-workspace-settings
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `
... cc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether c
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:22:56 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> Oops, I didn't read the question accurately. This might be more
> useful:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html
Oops, and I answered too fast: YYes, that's the kind of list
I was searching for. Now it
a list that states which CPU should be used with
> > (at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
>
> /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
Yes, that is where I got the initial setting of "core2" from.
but it didn't work out of the box. However with the hint of
first omitting CPUTYPE, co
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
(at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
/u
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
(at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
___
On 6/18/2011 9:38 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
omitted without
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
> I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
(at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
Meanwhile, the build process stopped after nearly 2 hours
with the following error:
cc
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 04:38:39AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > > Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> > > CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> > CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
> > omitted without problems?
> >
>
> I've use
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
> omitted without problems?
>
I've used core successfully for years. Did you clean any potential
conflicts? Wha
This happened with CPUTYPE=core after 11 minutes:
--
>>> stage 4.2: building libraries
--
cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=amd64 MACHINE=amd64 CPUT
YPE=cor
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:26:25 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> Here's a guess, I seem to remember another with a similar situation. The
> core2 support is rather new, as in very new. The current compiler on your
> system doesn't support it, although one build from sources should. If IIRC,
> the or
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> In the example make.conf, the following section can be found:
>
> # Currently the following CPU types are recognized:
> # Intel x86 architecture:
> # (AMD CPUs) opteron athlon64 athlon-mp athlon-xp athlon-4
> #
I am currently installing FreeBSD on my new (haha) home
desktop system that's waiting for some years now for this
event. The system is a quite cheap home PC from a discounter
that has the following CPU:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4300
@1.80GHz (1799.81-MHz K8-class CPU)
Some time
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:44:16PM +0200, herbert langhans thus spake:
Hi Daemons,
recently some of the ports get stuck when I compile from the portstree
with #make install - it says '1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to
nbase/configure.rej'.
The portstree is updated, FreeBSD 7.2 on this l
Hi Daemons,
recently some of the ports get stuck when I compile from the portstree
with #make install - it says '1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to
nbase/configure.rej'.
The portstree is updated, FreeBSD 7.2 on this laptop, many other ports
are working.
I had such trouble with ports/graph
>Heya!
>
>Anybody know what's wrong with this?
>
>## make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA
...
>/usr/src/sys/kern/sysv_msg.c:163: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to
>incomplete type 'struct freebsd7_msgctl_args
This error message is suggestive. ;)
>options COMPAT_FREEBSD4
>
>option
On 25/02/2011 12:21, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Heya!
Anybody know what's wrong with this?
## make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-
Do not use a custom kern for your upgrade, build generic with pf and altq.
I'm not sure your CPU type is correct ?
I could be wrong, haven't used 32bits for a while.
Make clean, then build the world, then your kern.
Once you have generic working, make your custom kern
---
Fleuriot Damien
On 25
On 25 February 2011 11:21, Redd Vinylene wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Anybody know what's wrong with this?
>
> ## make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA
>
Have you successfully used NINJA to build a kernel before?
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
Heya!
Anybody know what's wrong with this?
## make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA
cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-ext
ll right. The set of points of an orbit is all right and
> >> correct. But when it comes to positions at a specific time, then I loose
> >> hair!
The program mentioned below can generate accurate results for as often
as every few hours; handy at least for comparing your resul
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:05 AM, O. Hartmann <
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Hello.
> Well, the only other architectures I have access to are Linux boxes.
>
> clang ist a very nice compiler since its syntax checking is formidable. But
> its code is slow and there seems no OpenMP sup
alculates the set of points of an ellipse based upon
> ephemeridal datas taken from the Minor Planet Cataloge. Again, so
far,
> everything all right. The set of points of an orbit is all right and
> correct. But when it comes to positions at a specific time, then
I loose
time, then I loose
hair!
Compiling this piece of software with FreeBSD's gcc (V4.2) and clang (clang
devel) on my private and lab's FreeBSD boxes (both most recent FreeBSD
8.1/amd64), this program does well, the calculated orbital positions are
very close to professional applications or obs
everything all right. The set of points of an orbit is all right and
> > correct. But when it comes to positions at a specific time, then I loose
> > hair!
> >
> > Compiling this piece of software with FreeBSD's gcc (V4.2) and clang
> (clang
> > devel)
ific time, then I loose
> hair!
>
> Compiling this piece of software with FreeBSD's gcc (V4.2) and clang (clang
> devel) on my private and lab's FreeBSD boxes (both most recent FreeBSD
> 8.1/amd64), this program does well, the calculated orbital positions are
> very close to p
ellipse based upon ephemeridal datas taken from the Minor Planet
Cataloge. Again, so far, everything all right. The set of points of an
orbit is all right and correct. But when it comes to positions at a
specific time, then I loose hair!
Compiling this piece of software with FreeBSD's gcc (V4.2
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm looking for people who are using the Intel Compiler to build FreeBSD.
> Please contact me off list, so I can get a rough estimate on how many people
> are using it.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Rui Paulo
>
>
>
Hi,
Thanks! That solved the issue.
Cheers,
Antonio
On 28/07/2010 15:16, 文鳥 wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:07:38 +0200
Antonio Vieiro wrote:
make -DWITH_VIM_OPTIONS config
Hi Antonio,
I also had problems getting gnome support added, but at least the
following worked for me:
make
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:07:38 +0200
Antonio Vieiro wrote:
>
> make -DWITH_VIM_OPTIONS config
Hi Antonio,
I also had problems getting gnome support added, but at least the
following worked for me:
make WITH_GTK2=yes WITH_GNOME=yes install clean
Alternatively, you might consider installin
Hi all,
I'm trying to comile /usr/ports/editors/vim with gnome support.
To show the options I use
make -DWITH_VIM_OPTIONS config
and I select "gnome" in a dialog that is shown.
After that I issue a
make -DWITH_VIM_OPTIONS
But vim does not compile with gnome libraries.
Anyon
I personally just synced my servers Kernel and Userland to current via cvsup
on a live system and still get same issue as discussed here for unknown
reasons.
FreeBSD Alpha.The-IRC.Com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Extracting for lsof-4.
On Tue 25 May 2010 at 11:17:36 PDT Arthur Barlow wrote:
I did this and sure enough "vm_memattr_t" is defined as a parameter
in a typedef as follows: typedef int d_mmap2_t (struc cdev *dev,
vm_offset_t offset, vm_paddr_t *paddr, int nprot, vm_memattr_t
*memattr);
So the question is, why didn
Message: 29
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:14:52 -0700
From: Charlie Kester
Subject: Re: Problem compiling lsof
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100525051452.gi...@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 21:55:01 PDT Charlie
Can you also make sure that the installed world and kernel matches the source
tree?
Thanks,
Larry Rosenman
lsof maintainer
"Charlie Kester" wrote:
>On Mon 24 May 2010 at 18:54:11 PDT Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>Arthur Barlow writes:
>>
>>> Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 21:55:01 PDT Charlie Kester wrote:
The Configure script grep's for vm_memattr_t in
${LSOF_INCLUDE}/sys/conf.h and sets HAS_VM_MEMATTR_T if the grep
succeeds. The build failure tells us that your /usr/src/sys/conf.h uses
vm_memattr_t, so it seems the Configure is testing so
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 20:24:49 PDT Arthur Barlow wrote:
[r...@uranus /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof]# HASPSEUDOFS -DHASNULLFS
-DHASIPv6 -DHAS_STRFTIME -DLSOF_VSTR=\"8.0-STABLE\"")
cc -pipe -march=athlon -fno-strict-aliasing -march=athlon
-DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE -DHASSBSTATE -DHAS_KVM_VN
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On May 24, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> > That doesn't work, which was my point to begin with. The compile process
> throws an error.
>
> You're abbreviating too much. :-)
>
> If you want useful feedback, then you ought to provi
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arthur Barlow
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >
> >> Hi--
> >>
> >> On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> >> > Sorry about the false start. Fat
Hi Arthur,
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
>> Hi--
>>
>> On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
>> > Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
>> > program in FreeBSD 8.0 on
On Mon 24 May 2010 at 18:54:11 PDT Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Arthur Barlow writes:
Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
"dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "hack" in the header fi
Arthur Barlow writes:
> Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
> program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
> "dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "hack" in the header file. Any
> suggestions, besides playing with the code?
On May 24, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> That doesn't work, which was my point to begin with. The compile process
> throws an error.
You're abbreviating too much. :-)
If you want useful feedback, then you ought to provide a little more in the way
of details-- what error?
--
-Chuc
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> > Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
> > program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
> > "dlsof.h" and it looks l
Hi--
On May 24, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Barlow wrote:
> Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
> program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
> "dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "hack" in the header file. Any
> suggestions
Sorry about the false start. Fat fingers. I'm trying to compile the lsof
program in FreeBSD 8.0 on an i686 machine. There is a error referencing
"dlsof.h" and it looks like there is an ugly "hack" in the header file. Any
suggestions, besides playing with the code?
___
I've tried to compile lsof in FreeBSD
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 10:35:05AM -0400, tristan wrote:
> How would i go about compiling the FreeBSD source code (to build my own) in
> an Ubuntu machine? (windows 7 is also available). What programs do i need?
> Were can i download the source code?
Why do even need this?
Also, i doub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/04/2010 15:35:05, tristan wrote:
> How would i go about compiling the FreeBSD source code (to build my
> own) in an Ubuntu machine? (windows 7 is also available). What
> programs do i need?
Really you need FreeBSD already installed if
How would i go about compiling the FreeBSD source code (to build my own) in an
Ubuntu machine? (windows 7 is also available). What programs do i need? Were
can i download the source code?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't
[snip]
--
Compiling vbox/vbox-devel with gcc43
1) /usr/include/cam/cam.h needed #include for FILE define,
complained by:
[snip]
On Thursday 01 April 2010 16:53:36 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Mario Lobo wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > It's compiling right now.
> > >
> > > I'll post my findings and impressions
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> after
> > the next reboot.
>
> So, how is
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> > after the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it
Mario Lobo wrote:
> [...]
> It's compiling right now.
>
> I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after
> the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
if the new gcc version will really make a signifi
1 - 100 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo
