both of these telnet connections, it seems pam.d/telnetd authentication
config is not applied.. am i right?? then why?!
Excuse me for including different questions in one email.. but i found them
all related to my need..
Thank you all for your helps and ideas.
Be
Hi,
I am wondering how one would add support for additional options in the
kernel configuration files. I have found the config(8) program and the
related files '/sys/conf/file' & '/sys/conf/options', but am having
trouble finding any documentation leading me beyon
Hello list
After pretty much of googling I was able to make this bridge setup up and
running:
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bridge0="addm igb6 addm igb7"
ifconfig_bridge0_alias0="inet x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x"
ifconfig_igb6="up"
ifconfig_igb7="up"
however I'm running xorp pim multicast rou
e DEFAULTS and GENERIC files helpful.
> I have "makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes" statement in my kernel config file
> and the "blanktime" and "warp_saver" load modules don't get created.
Have a look at "man src.conf" for dealing with the creatio
file.
I have "makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes" statement in my kernel config file
and the "blanktime" and "warp_saver" load modules don't get created.
I need the options statements for those items so I can compile then into
the kernel.
Would it be /usr/src/sys/con
NO_MODULES=yes" statement in my kernel config file
and the "blanktime" and "warp_saver" load modules don't get created.
I need the options statements for those items so I can compile then into
the kernel.
Thanks
___
fr
On 9 February 2013 05:45, Mike Clarke wrote:
>
> I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
> started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
> were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed a
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and
left it to get on with it.
The next morning I discovered
On 04/11/2012 14:42, s m wrote:
hello everybody
i have a moxa 4-port serial card and installed it on freebsd8.2
successfully. i have ttyu2-5 in /dev that are moxa ports.
my question is how i can use these ports? i add the following lines to ttys
file:
ttyu2 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 o
I've been wanting gimp 2.8.0 (now 2.8.2) for a bit and as it's been slow to
show up in the ports collection, thought I would see about building it.
Unfortunately, I don't know squat about the process but figured trying it
would help slow my brain from atrophying at its currently rapidly accelerat
hello everybody
i have a moxa 4-port serial card and installed it on freebsd8.2
successfully. i have ttyu2-5 in /dev that are moxa ports.
my question is how i can use these ports? i add the following lines to ttys
file:
ttyu2 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure
ttyu3 "/usr/libexec/getty
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> What decides about that (built-in or module) ?
> # kldstat -v |grep cd9660
> 414 cd9660
> # kldstat -v |grep ext2fs
> 151 0xc9911000 11000ext2fs.ko (/boot/kernel/ext2fs.ko)
> 538 ext2fs
That was already clarified.
jb
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:51:38 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> The modules are always build, at least to my knowledge. So, you do not
> need any options for this. You just need to load them later.
The means of /etc/src.conf can be used to skip certain things
during a kernel + world build. For exampl
Erich Dollansky ovitrap.com> writes:
> ...
What decides about that (built-in or module) ?
# kldstat -v |grep cd9660
414 cd9660
# kldstat -v |grep ext2fs
151 0xc9911000 11000ext2fs.ko (/boot/kernel/ext2fs.ko)
538 ext2fs
jb
__
sys/conf/NOTES and sys//conf/NOTES
> contain directive lines like 'device', 'options', 'machine', 'ident',
> 'maxusers', 'makeoptions' etc that the user may place in the kernel
> configuration that she will run config(8) with.
options' etc that the user may place in the kernel configuration that she
will run config(8) with.
What is the specific mechanism (directive in GENERIC file, or something else
in GENERIC file or elsewhere) that says build support for cd9660 fs as built-in
and ext2fs as module, or entire kerne
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:41:44 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Hi,
> what controls how parts of kernel are built, that is, built-in or
> modular ? For example, I want to:
> - build a kernel that has eveything built in
this is normally not possible as some thing conflict which each other.
But most thi
Hi,
what controls how parts of kernel are built, that is, built-in or modular ?
For example, I want to:
- build a kernel that has eveything built in
- build a kernel that has everything possible (what controls the impossible ?)
built as modules
- build a kernel that has mixed support, e.g. suppor
On 11/09/2012 01:30, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> (This is probably a bit techical for 'questions' -- I'd welcome a suggesstion
> of a more appopriae forum.)
If you dont get any joy, try freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
Vince
> Is there a detailed description anywhere of the mec
(This is probably a bit techical for 'questions' -- I'd welcome a suggesstion
of a more appopriae forum.)
Is there a detailed description anywhere of the mechanics of *how* config(8)
does what it doess?
I'm looking fo the gory detail of how, sayi, 'device bpf' c
[ Matthias Fechner wrote on Wed 29.Aug'12 at 11:20:37 +0200 ]
> Am 29.08.12 12:38, schrieb AN:
> > Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps
>
> I use:
> cd /etc/mail/certs
>
>
> Create a CA:
>
> - Edit /etc/ssl/openssl.cfn -> default_days= 1825
> - Generate CAcertific
Am 29.08.12 12:38, schrieb AN:
> Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps
I use:
cd /etc/mail/certs
Create a CA:
- Edit /etc/ssl/openssl.cfn -> default_days= 1825
- Generate CAcertificate
-> /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -newca
cp demoCA/cacert.pem .
Create a key
Following the directions at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/openssl.html
Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps
# openssl dsaparam -rand -genkey -out myRSA.key 1024
# openssl gendsa -des3 -out myca.key myRSA.key
# openssl req -new -x509 -days 365
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 21:55:24 2012
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
> From: AN
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help
>
> FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-
AN writes:
> I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The
> problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I
> send or receive email. I would like the server to do the
> following:
This has been running fine for years on one of my machines.
the above). At least, that's how I do it.
or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and
implement content filters.
depends of who is talking and how "easiness" is defined.
Postfix is different. That's all.
___
freebsd-quest
[ Andrea Venturoli wrote on Tue 14.Aug'12 at 10:22:14 +0200 ]
> On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
> >FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
> >Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
> >r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> >
> >I am trying to configure sendmail +
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav or spamassas
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon
Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or rece
>> I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an
>> i686 CPU.
>>
>> By default, GENERIC has "HAMMER" as the cpu, and that isn't working. So
>> I tried both:
>
> you've got into wrong directory
>
> /usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right
>
> /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unles
I think it's likely that it is a 64-bit installation.
Not sure about that. How could the amd64 OS be installed
and run on a i386 machine?
it cannot.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
e: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:41:41 +0200 (CEST)
> > > > From: Wojciech Puchar
> > > > To: Chris Hill
> > > > Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
> > > >
> > >
h Puchar
> > > To: Chris Hill
> > > Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > > Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
> > >
> > > >> That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
> > > >
> > > > Jason: It
org
> > Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
> >
> > >> That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
> > >
> > > Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on
> > > your
> >
> > nonsense. 6
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Aug 7 02:44:36 2012
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:41:41 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> To: Chris Hill
> Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
>
>
== Iqbal Aroussi wrote on Tue 7.Aug'12 at 14:00:06 + ==
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thank you so much for your quick reply.
> How Can I override using openresolv/resolvconf or configuring it for static
> IP on a server ?
> Currently my servers are configured with DHCP by the webhost company.
> I prefe
Hi Matthew,
Thank you so much for your quick reply.
How Can I override using openresolv/resolvconf or configuring it for static
IP on a server ?
Currently my servers are configured with DHCP by the webhost company.
I prefer to have them configured with static IP but right now I'm stuck on
the open
On 07/08/2012 14:05, Iqbal Aroussi wrote:
> Can you please give some hints on configuring Openresolv on FreeBSD-9
> My server is configured with DHCP, but I want to change the nameservers in
> /etc/resolv.conf to use mein.
I'm not sure that Openresolv is necessarily the right thing to use.
This i
Hi
Can you please give some hints on configuring Openresolv on FreeBSD-9
My server is configured with DHCP, but I want to change the nameservers in
/etc/resolv.conf to use mein.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
--
*
Iqbal Aroussi
*
___
freebsd-questions
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your
nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has "HAMMER" as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
you've got into wrong directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit C
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, RW wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Usher wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's
an i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has "HAMMER" as the cpu, and that isn't working.
So I tried both:
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Usher wrote:
> I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's
> an i686 CPU.
>
> By default, GENERIC has "HAMMER" as the cpu, and that isn't working.
> So I tried both:
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
make LINT
vi LINT
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Jason Usher wrote:
> I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an
> i686 CPU.
>
> By default, GENERIC has "HAMMER" as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
> tried both:
>
> cpu I586_CPU
>
> and:
>
> cpu I686
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has "HAMMER" as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
cpu I586_CPU
and:
cpu I686_CPU
(I also tried them both lowercase, like i686_cpu)
But all of these fail:
GENERIC:
t
make config-recursive
cd ../..
done
would allow me to set up all the dependencies before continuing with the
install.
It appears, however, that it doesn't really recurse properly. I say "appears"
only because this is my first time trying this and despite doing the abo
m ports. I don't want to have to keep checking on it and
> filling out the appropriate check boxes for options. I naively assumed:
>
> for port in $ports
> do
> cd /usr/port/$port
>make config-recursive
>cd ../..
> done
>
> would allow me to set
I'm trying to build a script to rebuild and reinstall everything I have
installed from ports. I don't want to have to keep checking on it and filling
out the appropriate check boxes for options. I naively assumed:
for port in $ports
do
cd /usr/port/$port
make config
> I'm getting ready to install a new mail server. I want to configure
> sendmail+clamav+spamassassin+**mimedefang.
I believe postfix is considered to be much more secure and better then
sendmail overall. I have a mail server and find that postfix was pretty
easy to setup and configure. In additi
I'm getting ready to install a new mail server. I want to configure
sendmail+clamav+spamassassin+mimedefang. Does anyone have some pointers
or howto docs to share? I read somewhere that spamassassin-milter has
security issues. Is mime-defang a better option or should I consider
something e
Making the port Makefile put ${CFLAGS} directly into lua's Makefile (patch
>> at the end of this mail) fixes matters for me, but I don't understand the
>> port infrastructure well enough to understand whether this patch represents
>> a bugfix or a workaround of some local co
this mail) fixes matters for me, but I don't understand the
> port infrastructure well enough to understand whether this patch represents
> a bugfix or a workaround of some local configuration issue. Has anyone run
> into this issue before? If this is a config issue, any hints on what
lua-5.1.4-3.
> ===> Patching for lua-5.1.4_6
> ===> Applying distribution patches for lua-5.1.4_6
> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for lua-5.1.4_6
> ===> lua-5.1.4_6 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
> ===> Configuring for lua-5.1.4_6
>
ture well
enough to understand whether this patch represents a bugfix or a
workaround of some local configuration issue. Has anyone run into this
issue before? If this is a config issue, any hints on what might be
going on or how to dope it out?
Thanks for your help,
Lee Thomas
The details:
#date
Hi,
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> I've been wondering for a while now about the accuracy of some of the
> comments in /sys/conf/NOTES re: the various COMPAT_* options, and now,
> with 9.0-RELEASE already out the door and 10.0-CURRENT as the current
> development branch, it seems even more relevant
I've been wondering for a while now about the accuracy of some of the
comments in /sys/conf/NOTES re: the various COMPAT_* options, and now,
with 9.0-RELEASE already out the door and 10.0-CURRENT as the current
development branch, it seems even more relevant to ask just how
necessary or useful some
On Monday 19 December 2011 12:43:42 Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:48:23 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On 30 November 2011 14:03, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> A dirty workaround might
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:48:23 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 30 November 2011 14:03, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> A dirty workaround might be to link /.config
> >> to something innocuous. One could obvio-
&
On 30 November 2011 14:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>> A dirty workaround might be to link /.config
>> to something innocuous. One could obvio-
>> usly also have /.config mounted as a tmpfs(5).
>> So it couldn&
Hi users!
I`ve got some trouble in the kernel configuration. I think,there is
somebody able to help me
See the attached files.
Many thanks for attention.
dmesg.boot
Description: Binary data
newkernel.2011-10-12
Description: Binary data
___
fre
; bsdinstall and others. What I didn't have on 8.2 is when I start KDE4
>> > with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home
>> > but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4 as
>> > user I got it again. Inside is a file Tr
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> A dirty workaround might be to link /.config
> to something innocuous. One could obvio-
> usly also have /.config mounted as a tmpfs(5).
> So it couldn't persist from boot to boot.
>
> The cleanest solution
"b. f." writes:
> The handbook does contain some oblique and scattered references to the
> new code, or at least to constructs that are common to both the old
> and the new code, but the addition of a brief discussion of the
> differences between the new and old ATA code in the handbook -- i.e.,
> Now I think I'll try to rebuild the kernel with "options ATA_CAM" and drop
> "device atapicam".
>
> This question needs to be better resolved in time for FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE.
>
> I cross-post this message to freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org so the developers
> will see it. FreeBSD users want to be ab
> On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > "b. f." writes:
> >>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
> >>> > > config file?
> >>> > > Are they redundant? Kern
On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "b. f." writes:
>
>>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
>>> > > config file?
>>>
>>> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will buil
"b. f." writes:
>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
>> > > config file?
>>
>> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will
>> > > it
> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
> > > config file?
>
> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will
> > > it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated?
They a
"Thomas Mueller" writes:
> > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
> > config file?
> > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it
> > make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM depr
"Thomas Mueller" writes:
> What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel config
> file?
>
> Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it
> make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated?
> > > with bsdinstall and others. What I didn't have on 8.2 is when I start
> > > KDE4 with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in
> > > /home but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again
> > > KDE4 as user I
en I start KDE4
> > with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home
> > but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4 as
> > user I got it again. Inside is a file Trolltech.conf (the same is in
> > /home/.config).
>
> That file
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:39:21 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I succesfully installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2 and I didn't have problems with
> bsdinstall and others. What I didn't have on 8.2 is when I start KDE4 with
> startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .co
What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel config
file?
Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it
make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated?
I am trying to burn a CD (or DVD) on a SATA DVD-RW drive, but cdrtool
Hi!
I succesfully installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2 and I didn't have problems with
bsdinstall and others. What I didn't have on 8.2 is when I start KDE4 with
startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home but what it
happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4
On 11/3/11 11:35 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Actually, using a view that matches only the VPN's IP range would do the
>> trick easily and efficiently.
>
> Views are a way of giving a different answer depending on who is asking
> the question -- how
On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> You can simply create a forward zone.
Actually, yes, that's a good idea too. Should have much the same effect
and it's been available in BIND approximately forever. There's
difference in the niggling details of how it all works, so worth
experimenti
On 11/3/11 8:51 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote:
>> I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
>> and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do
>> I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote:
> I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
> and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do
> I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
> specific domain.
This sounds like a job for a
It depends...
some VPNs push routes, including default routes, and nameservers and
search paths, but it's up to the client on how to handle it. Some of
these will set /etc/resolv.conf, etc.
What *kind* of VPN are you talking about? OpenVPN? PPTP? L2TP?
I generally prefer dnscache to BIND, an
I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do I
configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
specific domain.
When I am connected to the VPN, vpn.example.com, I want queries
There are many other compile-with not started with ${NORMAL_C}, your
patch adds
${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} to them too, which could not be suitable for this.
2011/10/19 Ryan Stone :
> I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the
> following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to ha
I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the
following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to have worked for me:
--- mkmakefile.c 11:09:30.0 -0400
+++ mkmakefile.c2011-10-06 11:13:31.0 -0400
@@ -742,15 +742,16 @@
break;
when I digged the a PR(bin/160275), I found in_proto.c and
if_ethersubr.c ( see sys/conf/files ) does not get
${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} post-processing in Makefile
(/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL/Makefile) generated by config(8), so
the objs does not contain ctf section
In /usr/src/usr.sbin/config
El día Saturday, June 25, 2011 a las 07:20:52PM -0500, Dan Nelson escribió:
> Checking Solaris and SUSE Linux, I see a similar pair of directories:
>
> solaris$ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
>
> linux$ pkg-config --cflags
In the last episode (Jun 25), Matthias Apitz said:
> Why gives
>
> $ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0
> -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include
>
> $ ls -ld /usr/local/include/glib-2.0 /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include
> ls: /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/inc
Hello,
Why gives
$ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0
-I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include
$ ls -ld /usr/local/include/glib-2.0 /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include
ls: /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include: No such file or directory
drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 May 28 19:01 /usr
On May 30, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
>> Perhaps this is the one you meant?
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html
>
> That's the one! Thanks!
>
>> Actually the two threads touch on the same subjec
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> A little empirical testing:
>
> Times for buildworld after a fresh reboot, /usr/obj/usr deleted, GENERIC
> included, running ccache:
>
> default (486/586 included) 9:05.84
> nocpu I486, nocpu I586_CPU 9.27.88
> nocpu I486_CPU
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
Perhaps this is the one you meant?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html
That's the one! Thanks!
Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems re
Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> > Perhaps this is the one you meant?
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html
>
> That's the one! Thanks!
>
> > Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems
> > re
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> sys/i386/i386/support.s is mentioned, but doesn't seem to have anything
> explicitly specific for 586. There are some i686 entries.
>
> A test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586 in /sys/i386/isa/npx.c is mentioned in
> the thread, but that check is
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote:
Perhaps this is the one you meant?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html
That's the one! Thanks!
Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems
removal of those options is still desirable
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that suggested
> it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a kernel
> config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, AFAIR.
>
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that
>> suggested it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a
>> kernel co
Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that
suggested it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in
a kernel config even for much newer processors. For performance
reasons, AFAIR. Naturally I didn't save that post or a link to it.
Can anyone find
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mahan wrote:
It's at the root -
# echo /boot.conf
-P
Line 78 of sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c says:
#define PATH_CONFIG "/boot.config"
Also, there's boot.config(5). If boot.conf also works, maybe it's only
looking
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mahan wrote:
It's at the root -
# echo /boot.conf
-P
Line 78 of sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c says:
#define PATH_CONFIG "/boot.config"
Also, there's boot.config(5). If boot.conf also works, maybe it's only
looking for a match on the first 8 or 9 character
icial opinion of Adara Networks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnel...@allantgroup.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:52 AM
> To: Patrick Mahan
> Cc: Paul Macdonald; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or
In the last episode (Feb 01), Patrick Mahan said:
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Macdonald
> > I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof
> > getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the ha
1 - 100 of 1038 matches
Mail list logo
