the
8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick fixit prompt up.
It boots fine, and sysinstall comes up, but I continually get No USB
devices found! when I go to the fixit/USB option.
When I switch to the debug tty, I see da0, and all my device parameters.
I've even created a second USB stick
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Ian Smith wrote:
One more thing, while I remember .. seeing the USB stick is here ad0a,
isn't that the old 'dangerously dedicated mode' now dropped from 8.0?
That's da0a of course.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone else out there has successfully gotten the
8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick fixit prompt up.
It boots fine, and sysinstall comes up, but I continually get No USB
devices found! when I go to the fixit/USB option.
When I switch to the debug tty, I
For the archives, there's now a PR for this:
bin/140972
- Derek
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone else out there has successfully gotten
the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick fixit prompt up.
It boots fine, and sysinstall comes up, but I continually get No
USB devices found! when I go to the fixit/USB option.
When I switch to the debug tty, I see da0, and all my
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Derek (freebsd lists)
48225...@razorfever.net wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone else out there has successfully gotten the
8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick fixit prompt up.
It boots fine, and sysinstall comes up, but I continually get No USB
devices found! when I
Randi Harper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Derek (freebsd lists)
48225...@razorfever.net wrote:
It boots fine, and sysinstall comes up, but I continually get No USB
devices found! when I go to the fixit/USB option.
Anyways, has anyone successfully gotten the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick
Fogot to ask. When I login as a root I see invitation sign %, not #. What
it means?
Arkady Tokaev
From: tok...@hotmail.com
To: free...@edvax.de
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Unknown devices
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:15:58 +0400
Grate thanks!I had installed from 3 CD
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:14:29 +0400, Arkady Tokaev tok...@hotmail.com wrote:
Fogot to ask. When I login as a root I see invitation
sign %, not #. What it means?
The prompt character shows if you are logged in as root or not.
Most shells use $ or % for non-root, and # for root.
Which shell are
19M 18K 19M 0%/root
/dev/md331M6.1M 24M20%/var
$
What is the md devices?How I can remove them?
See man md: The md devices refer to memory disks, RAM that
emulates a hard disk.
Sadly, I don't recognize a reason why your /etc, /usr/local/etc,
/root
because I very
novice in FreeBSD. I just followed the instruction for FreeBSD router.
Once more thanks,
Arkady Tokaev
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:38:03 +0200
From: free...@edvax.de
To: tok...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Unknown devices
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:04
/dev/md0 9.4M
2.8M6.5M30%/etc/dev/md131M 16M 13M55%
/usr/local/etc/dev/md219M 18K 19M 0%/root/dev/md3
31M6.1M 24M20%/var$What is the md devices?How I can remove
them?
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Arkady
%/var
$
What is the md devices?How I can remove them?
See man md: The md devices refer to memory disks, RAM that
emulates a hard disk.
Sadly, I don't recognize a reason why your /etc, /usr/local/etc,
/root and /var subtrees are mounted onto memory disks... seems
that you're not running a default
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 11:52 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
My question is what the difference is between 'sa0.0' and 'sa0.[1-3]'.
I can't seem to find it documented anywhere.
Maybe submit a PR+Patch to the man page file? ~BAS
From the top of my head, I think I remember devices
to completly hide re0:
# ifconfig re0 name lan0
Hi FreeBSD community
Thank you all for replies.
Yes, USB Mass Storage devices could be symlinked (may be others too) but
ethernet devices cannot be symlinked but ethernet interfaces can be renamed.
I have one more question, how do I know what
Hi,
I just plugged in an old SCSI tape changer, and got the following
devices:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel6 Jul 10 03:28 esa0 - esa0.0
crw-rw 1 root operator0, 96 May 14 05:43 esa0.0
crw-rw 1 root operator0, 102 May 14 05:43 esa0.1
crw-rw
Hi,
My question is what the difference is between 'sa0.0' and 'sa0.[1-3]'.
I can't seem to find it documented anywhere.
From the top of my head, I think I remember devices sa0.[1-3] would
represent different compression mode.
Bests,
Olivier
Hi
Is it possible to create a symlink to a device and use the symlink in place
of the real device name in FreeBSD, especially in version 7.2?
1. A disk
/dev/camera - /dev/da0s1
2. A network device
re0 - lan0
Kind regards
Sagara
___
Is it possible to create a symlink to a device and use the symlink in place
of the real device name in FreeBSD, especially in version 7.2?
1. A disk
/dev/camera - /dev/da0s1
devfs.conf(5)
2. A network device
re0 - lan0
same as above, but there is way to completly hide re0:
#
. But not in this case, I think. You don't want any old usb
device to be linked to /dev/camera! USB devices are enumerated in the
sequence thay are plugged in. So there is no hard guarantee that the
camera will always be available as da0s1. It might be da1s1 if another
USB drive was plugged in earlier.
And not all
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:33:42 -0500, Sagara Wijetunga sag...@tomahawk.com.sg
wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to create a symlink to a device and use the symlink in place
of the real device name in FreeBSD, especially in version 7.2?
1. A disk
/dev/camera - /dev/da0s1
2. A network
. A disk
/dev/camera - /dev/da0s1
devfs.conf(5)
Geneally, yes. But not in this case, I think. You don't want any old
usb device to be linked to /dev/camera! USB devices are enumerated in
the sequence thay are plugged in. So there is no hard guarantee that
the camera will always
I just built a new computer with an ASUS P5Q Pro Turbo LGA 775 Intel P45
ATX Intel Motherboard and the install isn't seeing the IDE devices. I'm
using the AMD64 DVD to install the OS. The computer sees both the 120GB
IDE drive and the DVD drive, but FreeBSD only sees the six SATA drives
once
(via on-board soundcard/chip
and the attached speakerset and/or headphones).
I see 4 mixer-devices: mixer0 through mixer3. mixer0 seems to be
attached to the graphics-card, mixer1 shows the usual devices I
recognize and mixer 2 and 3 are unknown to me, they show up only 2
facilities.
To make
problems - they either
play no sound through the usual pathways (via on-board soundcard/chip
and the attached speakerset and/or headphones).
I see 4 mixer-devices: mixer0 through mixer3. mixer0 seems to be
attached to the graphics-card, mixer1 shows the usual devices I
recognize and mixer 2 and 3
etc. do have problems - they either
play no sound through the usual pathways (via on-board soundcard/chip
and the attached speakerset and/or headphones).
I see 4 mixer-devices: mixer0 through mixer3. mixer0 seems to be
attached to the graphics-card, mixer1 shows the usual devices I
recognize
, like vlc, mplayer etc. do have problems - they
either play no sound through the usual pathways (via on-board
soundcard/chip and the attached speakerset and/or headphones).
I see 4 mixer-devices: mixer0 through mixer3. mixer0 seems to be
attached to the graphics-card, mixer1 shows the usual
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:58:53 Mel wrote:
I looked for status on this project, can't seem to find it atm.
Found it:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=306
Looks like it's even gonna be MFC'd \o/
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and
hej mel, thanx for the information. so it's fixed (ufs, msdosfs) on
CURRENT. finally after years of pain, i cannot wait to test that :D
best regards marco
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:58:53 Mel wrote:
I looked for status on this project, can't seem to find it atm.
hello list,
i ran into a lot of crashes because of problems with externally mounted
devices through usb. after successful mount, an ejecting of the device,
w/o unmounting it, ususally results in a freeze of the system, followed
by reboot. also with defect hardware, or cable problems this occurs
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:07:06 Marco wrote:
hello list,
i ran into a lot of crashes because of problems with externally mounted
devices through usb. after successful mount, an ejecting of the device,
w/o unmounting it, ususally results in a freeze of the system, followed
by reboot
I just rebooted my laptop that I have today's USB2 hopefully with the
latest USB compatibility, if I understood the GENERIC kernel
correctly. I'm using i386 version, up to date as of this morning.
Ports are completely up to date. all etc/dev* stuff is as it was with
USB1.
With
on FBSD 7.1-stable i386.
I followed the UPDATE procedures, had no errors on build,
but on X -configure I get
No devices to configure. Configuration failed.
This is a Compaq Armada 1700 laptop, old I know, but 7.3 worked
fine. The graphics is by Chips and Technologies
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:31:43PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:42 +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Upgrade from 7.3 to 7.4 made X unsuable on FBSD 7.1-stable i386.
I followed the UPDATE procedures, had no errors on build,
but on X -configure I get
No devices
no errors on build,
but on X -configure I get
No devices to configure. Configuration failed.
This is a Compaq Armada 1700 laptop, old I know, but 7.3 worked
fine. The graphics is by Chips and Technologies, nothing fancy,
and the driver is xf86-video-chips-1.2.1. The full log
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:42 +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Upgrade from 7.3 to 7.4 made X unsuable on FBSD 7.1-stable i386.
I followed the UPDATE procedures, had no errors on build,
but on X -configure I get
No devices to configure. Configuration failed.
This is a Compaq Armada 1700
Upgrade from 7.3 to 7.4 made X unsuable on FBSD 7.1-stable i386.
I followed the UPDATE procedures, had no errors on build,
but on X -configure I get
No devices to configure. Configuration failed.
This is a Compaq Armada 1700 laptop, old I know, but 7.3 worked
fine. The graphics is by Chips
Im running FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE an due to my old modem//router being on
its way out to the graveyard in worakability, i have had to swap over to
another, but having to use a USB connection instead of my onboard
network card. Problem i have is telling my machine to stop looking for
traffic on
0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
[5] -1 0 0x - 0x00ff (0x100) IX[B]
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 0...@00:08:0
No devices to configure. Configuration failed.
What's going on? Obviously nothing happened with devices during the
ports upgrade. The driver is still chips
working. It was working fine from Linux.It is a Sun machine with onboard
nVidia ethernet.
So I connected a USB to ethernet adapter.It works.But I had to reboot the
computer.It would a little nice if setup would re-probe devices.
Also, when you boot the boot only CD, and say to use the CDfor the install
works.But I had to reboot the
computer.It would a little nice if setup would re-probe devices.
exit just setup and get back. kernel do autoattach, just setup scans
devices once.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hi List,
i've using a Notebook with touchpad which works perfeclty fine. However,
i'd like also to use in paralell an external via usb connect mouse. If i
configure this hard into X.org config
it will work but i stumble here on problems. First of all, i have to
shutdown the X.org Server to do so,
Le Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:53:02 +0100,
Marco ilikef...@web.de a écrit :
Hi List,
Hello,
i've using a Notebook with touchpad which works perfeclty fine.
However, i'd like also to use in paralell an external via usb connect
mouse. If i configure this hard into X.org config
it will work but i
Hello Patrick,
works like a charm. I had to test a little bit, but i ended up with
/dev/sysmouse in Xorg config and the following lines in the devd.conf:
attach 200 {
device-name psm0;
action /usr/sbin/moused -a 2 -p /dev/psm0 -I
/var/run/moused.psm0.pid;
/usr/sbin/vidcontrol -m
/3knjrp ) which utilizes the intel ICH7
southbridge for sata devices. I am currently running FreeBSD
7.0-STABLE. The issue is that although the sata controller is
apparently detected correctly (It shows up by name in dmesg) the
devices attached to it do not show up when running 'atacontrol list
Hi,
I use PF to manage the traffic going through a VPN connection (ng0 to
ng1). I am also able to manage the traffic on the device where I
expect the VPN traffic (ed1 and ed2).
But now my problems starts I also want to manage the outgoing traffic
on ed0 to the WAN side.
On my router s
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 06:20:09 Andrew Falanga wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 08:38:58 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to know if anyone here on the list has ever used libusb
(http://libusb.sourceforge.net) for accessing usb devices. I
successfully
Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone here on the list has ever used libusb
(http://libusb.sourceforge.net) for accessing usb devices. I
successfully compiled and installed it on my FreeBSD 7 laptop but when
I run a test program no USB HUBs are found. The same test on a Fedora
box works fine. I
Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to know if anyone here on the list has ever used libusb
(http://libusb.sourceforge.net) for accessing usb devices. I
successfully compiled and installed it on my FreeBSD 7 laptop but when
I run a test program no USB HUBs are found. The same
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to know if anyone here on the list has ever used libusb
(http://libusb.sourceforge.net) for accessing usb devices. I
successfully compiled and installed it on my FreeBSD
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 08:38:58 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to know if anyone here on the list has ever used libusb
(http://libusb.sourceforge.net) for accessing usb devices. I
successfully compiled and installed it on my FreeBSD 7 laptop
the device?
Start with usb(4). HID devices tend to be easier to deal with than
others, but I doubt your instruments are in that category.
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell
things like VID/PID, and
most importantly, reading the data from the device?
Start with usb(4). HID devices tend to be easier to deal with than
others, but I doubt your instruments are in that category.
Actually, if it was a thumb drive, yes it would surely not be a hid device, but
an oximeter
Hi,
I'd like to read data from a USB device that is not a thumb drive. How
would I do this? For instance, it's an oximeter for reading
biometrics. What libraries exist for reading things like VID/PID, and
most importantly, reading the data from the device?
Thanks,
Andy
On Monday 07 July 2008 19:24:36 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
atacontrol cap device
_Really_nice_ ...
Will add it to my repertoire :)
thanks for the hint Wojciech !
--
Blessings
Gonzalo Nemmi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Okay - I've tried this against two devices in the system. The devices
queried are report as ad0 and ad2. When using the following command against
either device I get the following response:
usage: atacontrol command channel [args]
Now, it must be noted that I am using a ccd device that's has
All,
I'm looking for a FreeBSD utility that will allow me to query a disk for its
serial number. Can you point me to such a tool that'll allow me to do so?
Regards,
*
Vaughn E. Clinton
Systems Analyst
Scientific Computing Resources
HPC-3
Los Alamos
On 2008.07.07 13:54:06, Vaughn Clinton wrote:
All,
I'm looking for a FreeBSD utility that will allow me to query a disk for its
serial number. Can you point me to such a tool that'll allow me to do so?
Assuming you mean a hard disk, if you can run smartmontools, this is
from smartctl(8):
atacontrol cap device
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Vaughn Clinton wrote:
All,
I'm looking for a FreeBSD utility that will allow me to query a disk for its
serial number. Can you point me to such a tool that'll allow me to do so?
Regards,
*
Vaughn E. Clinton
mdmfs(8) has an example of a malloc-backed md device mounted with the
async option. Is there any point in doing this with malloc and vnode
devices? In neither case does a write to the file-system require a write
to a physical disk.
i don't think so.
but if you use FreeBSD 7 use tmpfs. it says
-store is swap, I
would have expected that changes would only be written-out when memory
is needed elsewhere rather than to keep the backing-store synchronized.
Let's recap :-)
You said:
Is there any point in doing this with malloc and vnode
devices? In neither case does a write to the file
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
mdmfs(8) has an example of a malloc-backed md device mounted with the
async option. Is there any point in doing this with malloc and vnode
devices? In neither case does a write to the file-system require a write
to a physical disk.
i don't think so.
but if you use
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:39:35 +0200
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I was referring to vnode devices. I guess there was some
confusion because in your reply you mentioned swap, not vnode.
Sorry, that was my fault. I meant to ask about about malloc and
swap backed devices, and never
but if you use FreeBSD 7 use tmpfs. it says it's experimental feature, but
still not crashed on 3 computers i use it.
There are known bugs, don't use it if you value your stability :)
what it's missing is some kind of quota, you may crash the system by simply
filling it up and using all swap
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
but if you use FreeBSD 7 use tmpfs. it says it's experimental
feature, but still not crashed on 3 computers i use it.
There are known bugs, don't use it if you value your stability :)
what it's missing is some kind of quota, you may crash the system by
simply filling it
RW wrote:
But isn't the normal point of async to avoid having the cpu waiting for
the disk with nothing to do. If there's nothing to block on, the cpu can
be consistently utilized without async. I suppose with SMP it might
help spread the work between cpus, but with a single cpu it seems like
mdmfs(8) has an example of a malloc-backed md device mounted with the
async option. Is there any point in doing this with malloc and vnode
devices? In neither case does a write to the file-system require a write
to a physical disk.
___
freebsd-questions
RW wrote:
mdmfs(8) has an example of a malloc-backed md device mounted with the
async option. Is there any point in doing this with malloc and vnode
devices? In neither case does a write to the file-system require a write
to a physical disk.
Well, for vnode devices it does write to the disk
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:19:46 +0200
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
mdmfs(8) has an example of a malloc-backed md device mounted with
the async option. Is there any point in doing this with malloc and
vnode devices? In neither case does a write to the file-system
require
RW wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:19:46 +0200
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
mdmfs(8) has an example of a malloc-backed md device mounted with
the async option. Is there any point in doing this with malloc and
vnode devices? In neither case does a write to the file-system
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:08:34 +0200
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
I meant that a write to the filesystem doesn't require a
corresponding write to disk, and the change can stay in memory
indefinitely. Presumably, more or less, the same inactive pages get
written-out to
I feel like I'm missing something obvious.
When I plug in a compact flash card reader, I can check /var/log/messages
to see what devices it has recently detected. What I'd like to be able
to do, however, is just enter a simple command at the shell prompt and
get a list of what devices
On Friday 11 April 2008 00:50:00 Chad Perrin wrote:
I feel like I'm missing something obvious.
When I plug in a compact flash card reader, I can check /var/log/messages
to see what devices it has recently detected. What I'd like to be able
to do, however, is just enter a simple command
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55:32AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can
see its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I
could use some help getting sd/xd devices working with my card
reader), but the removal seems to come
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 16:21 +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55:32AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can
see its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I
could use some help getting sd/xd devices
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55:32AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can see
its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I could use
some help getting sd/xd devices working with my card reader), but the
removal seems to come
into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can see
its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I could use
some help getting sd/xd devices working with my card reader), but the
removal seems to come unstuck.
I have some barely literates on my systems, so I do need
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 08:43 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55:32AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can see
its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I could use
some help getting sd/xd devices
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:55:37PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can see
its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I could use
some help getting sd/xd devices working with my card reader), but the
removal seems
devices working with my card reader), but the
removal seems to come unstuck.
I have some barely literates on my systems, so I do need to work this
out. Is it possible to use a forced umount to do this? What are the
options here?
In all honesty, I'm not sure FreeBSD (or any other
Am Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:40:39 +1000 schrieb Da Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That last point would only occur if the device was still being written
to- right?
No.
Removing a mounted device will cause a panic, writes pending or not.
Maybe look at the emulators/mtools port, which gives you access to
I'm just looking into the removable device issue for freebsd. I can see
its easy enough to auto mount a removable device (although I could use
some help getting sd/xd devices working with my card reader), but the
removal seems to come unstuck.
I have some barely literates on my systems, so I do
works as expected, except after putting
the laptop to sleep with acpiconf -s 3, upon wake up,
the USB devices (network card or flash drive) wouldn't
work anymore.
I tried to restart usbd and devd, and that wouldn't
help.
Anyone has an idea? Here are the dmesg and kernel
config.
Regards,
Michael
. After trying
to design the rules, I concluded that it was either illogical
or beyond my ipfw rule skills. Then it occurred to me to try
to run three if_bridge devices as shown in the second Target
One box, 6 NICs, 3 networks kept isolated for arp but
IP-managed in a single instance of ipfw.
I got
with a single LAN backbone as shown first here. After trying
to design the rules, I concluded that it was either illogical
or beyond my ipfw rule skills. Then it occurred to me to try
to run three if_bridge devices as shown in the second Target
One box, 6 NICs, 3 networks kept isolated for arp but
IP
Hi list,
I'm using FreeBSD 6.2 on a IBM x236 dual Xeon server. This device has
two network interfaces working with the bge driver.
pciconf -v -l output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x026f1014 chip=0x16a714e4 rev=0x02
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device
In creating a geli encrypted drive, I tried using a sector size of 8K,
but experienced random panics. I've now switched to 4K and am using
bonnie to stability test the partition.
Is anyone aware of stability issues with geli partitions with blocks
larger than 4K? The docs indicate that larger
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 07:32:36 pm Cameron Stuart wrote:
Hardware: Maxtron AMD opteron with 3ware 4 port PCI express SATA II
raid 5
Problem Description:
The 3ware driver must be loaded into the kernel using KLD, but the
floppy device cannot be found
However, the drive exists, and is
Hardware: Maxtron AMD opteron with 3ware 4 port PCI express SATA II
raid 5
Problem Description:
The 3ware driver must be loaded into the kernel using KLD, but the
floppy device cannot be found
However, the drive exists, and is configured correctly in the BIOS
(IE, the system can boot from
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:13 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
I just got a new INTEL motherboard - chock full of these new-fangled
SATA connectors... and one legacy ATA connector. I moved a disk
drive from an older box to this new one..
The machine can boot from the disk drive, but
Just to follow up on the Intel DG33UB issues.
I tried the 7.0 BETA bootonly ISO image today; and low-and-behold,
that found the missing CDROM drive.
I'm going to try the 6.3 BETA when it rolls out...
- Thanks -
- Dave Rivers -
--
Work:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:13 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
I just got a new INTEL motherboard - chock full of these new-fangled
SATA connectors... and one legacy ATA connector. I moved a disk
drive from an older box to this new one..
The machine can boot from the disk drive, but then
I just got a new INTEL motherboard - chock full of these new-fangled
SATA connectors... and one legacy ATA connector. I moved a disk
drive from an older box to this new one..
The machine can boot from the disk drive, but then after the kernel
is up-and-running - it can't find the drive to mount
it aborted, but when you press Enter, it goes
ahead with the install). BTW, this is in FreeBSD 6.2.
As a work around, if I go into the options and
select rescan for hardware
devices (not sure if that is the exact wording)
after inserting the floppy
disk, it will work OK as well. Might
into the options and select rescan for hardware
devices (not sure if that is the exact wording) after inserting the floppy
disk, it will work OK as well. Might be worth a try.
No luck. I've rescanned time after time, and get nothing. No sloppy
devices show up in dmesg, cannot use mount_msdosfs
Dear list
I followed documents I found on the Internet which says by
editing /boot/device.hints I can assign IRQ or disable devices, and I
tried to do so, modification in /boot/device.hint do have effect over
some device, for example:
hint.fdc.0.disable=1
but some seetings do not have effect
Zhang Weiwu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can I get knowledge of how device.hints works? e.g. maybe it can
only work with device that is not managed by a PNP BIOS or maybe it only
manage ISA devices but not PCI devices?
It sounds like you haven't read man device.hints.
That is a good place
在 2007-07-05四的 09:19 -0400，Lowell Gilbert写道：
Zhang Weiwu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can I get knowledge of how device.hints works? e.g. maybe it can
only work with device that is not managed by a PNP BIOS or maybe it only
manage ISA devices but not PCI devices?
It sounds like you
On Wed, 30 May 2007 10:22:09 +0200
grace Ingabire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply.
np
Yes, I have seen that file in etc/syslog.conf.
I want to monitor some of my devices, to know exactly who has log in, who is
doing what on my system...
It depends a lot on what
Thanks for your quick reply.
Yes, I have seen that file in etc/syslog.conf.
I want to monitor some of my devices, to know exactly who has log in, who is
doing what on my system...
Can you advise me a script or any tool to examine the log files as I want to
consider this machine as a server
101 - 200 of 540 matches
Mail list logo
