stheg olloydson wrote:
Glad to be of help. Raidframe had been ported to FBSD 5.x, but it was
removed because kernel changes broke it, and no one volunteered to fix
it. I think gvinum replaced vinum in 5.3 for the same reason. I don't
use software raid, so I don't really know.
It's a pity that raidf
it was said
> Just a few day ago i installed NetBSD 2.0 to make a final stroke to
> my decision as i got this computer on the 16. of november. Main
> advantage in my opinion is that raidframe performs better than vinum
(at least
> with my setup and with the tests i performed). There are some othe
stheg olloydson wrote:
(Sorry about the multiple posts. I somehow sent this without a subject
line before.)
Never mind. Nobody's perfect. ;)
To sum up your problem, you tested "FreeBSD 5.3, NetBSD 2.0, FreeBSD
4.11 and an elder version of the Knoppix (Linux 2.4) CD" and found that
FreeBSD 4.11RC2 h
In a message dated 1/16/05 7:43:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>stheg
>
>P.S. (to the list in general) Why do all of the questions about FBSD
>performance, especially 4.x vs 5.x, come from people posting from
>Windows boxes? Theories?
Because performance is a server issue a
In a message dated 1/16/05 7:43:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>Now i am really puzzled because i cannot understand why 4.x behaves
>>relatively good compared to 5.x on this specific issue. Is there a
>>good explanation or does one have to investigate this further?
>Al
stheg wrote:
P.S. (to the list in general) Why do all of the questions about FBSD
performance, especially 4.x vs 5.x, come from people posting from
Windows boxes? Theories?
Cuz if you have freebsd on your desktop, you don't give a damn
about its performance. It's just too great. And don't look at m
(Sorry about the multiple posts. I somehow sent this without a subject
line before.)
it was said:
>Now i am really puzzled because i cannot understand why 4.x behaves
>relatively good compared to 5.x on this specific issue. Is there a
>good explanation or does one have to investigate this furth
Hi all.
I got a dual Piii 800 box here with these specifications:
-Supermicro 370DL3 Mainboard
-Adaptec aic7892 Ultra160 SCSI adapter (onboard)
-2x 256MB Micron ECC RAM (tested with memtest)
-2x IBM IC35L036UWDY10-0 (SCSI Drives, only one connected for testing)
-LG GSA-4040B (connected via onboard