Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2003-01-02 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-31 01:35:06 -0500: > "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > BTW I'd love to see sendmail and named removed from the installs and > > moved to ports/packages only. > > Lots of people say that, but no one's done the work yet. It's a > *huge* amount of work, if you thi

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-31 Thread paul
Jonathan Chen wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:19:20PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Dec 30), Brian said: hmm code freeze applies to ports as well, that is surprising. Ports and packages get put on -RELEASE cds just like kernel and userland; they get the same code-freeze tre

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-31 Thread dick hoogendijk
On 30 Dec Brian wrote: > BTW I'd love to see sendmail and named removed from the installs and > moved to ports/packages only. I hope not. I like sendmail and bind and getting them out-of-the-box is perfect for me ;-)) -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBS

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-31 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:19:20PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 30), Brian said: > > hmm code freeze applies to ports as well, that is surprising. > > Ports and packages get put on -RELEASE cds just like kernel and > userland; they get the same code-freeze treatment. Yeah,

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because ports are really config files to obtain and install other peoples > software. Ports that would be deemed critical to system operation, like > perl, I could see freezing those. But all ports? The number of ports that are mission-critical to *somebody

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread Brian
only. Bri - Original Message - From: "Lowell Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "paul beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "BSD baby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday,

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 30), Brian said: > hmm code freeze applies to ports as well, that is surprising. Ports and packages get put on -RELEASE cds just like kernel and userland; they get the same code-freeze treatment. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hmm code freeze applies to ports as well, that is surprising. Why would it be surprising? They get shipped together, they need to be consistent with each other and verified to build at that time. It's just decent release engineering. To Unsubscribe: send ma

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread Brian
hmm code freeze applies to ports as well, that is surprising. Bri - Original Message - From: "paul beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "BSD baby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 7:55 PM Subject: Re: do we

Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread paul beard
BSD baby wrote: Sorry: new to FreeBSD (was an OpenBSD guy before this). I'm impressed with how fast FreeBSD puts new releases into its ports tree. Now that PHP 4.3 is out, I'm dying to use its new features, so I'm wondering if anyone knows a guesstimate on how long it should take for PHP 4.3 to

do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?

2002-12-30 Thread BSD baby
Sorry: new to FreeBSD (was an OpenBSD guy before this). I'm impressed with how fast FreeBSD puts new releases into its ports tree. Now that PHP 4.3 is out, I'm dying to use its new features, so I'm wondering if anyone knows a guesstimate on how long it should take for PHP 4.3 to be in the cvsup'