I'm getting accostumed to dump my fbsd 5.4 filesystems with dump on
files in a samba share. Now, I'd like to compress the dumped files in
the making (for instance piping it via tar) but I don't know how to do
it.
Could you please help me?
Ciao
Vittorio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] it [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm getting accostumed to dump my fbsd 5.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] filesystems with dump on files in a samba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share. Now, I'd like to compress the dumped files
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm getting accostumed to dump my fbsd 5.4 filesystems with dump on
files in a samba share. Now, I'd like to compress the dumped files in
the making (for instance piping it via tar) but I don't know how to do
it.
Could you please help me?
Use gzip(1) or compress(1) if it is already
Robin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dump -0 -f - /dev/yourfilesystem |bzip2 -c dump.bz
I compressed a filesystem dump (on Athlon 64/3200+, i386 OS) and
bzip2 compressed to 50% of 2 GB in 1118 sec
gzip compressed to 52% of 2 GB in 306 sec
But bzip2 can compress much better than
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Gary W. Swearingen thusly...
I compressed a filesystem dump (on Athlon 64/3200+, i386 OS) and
bzip2 compressed to 50% of 2 GB in 1118 sec
gzip compressed to 52% of 2 GB in 306 sec
But bzip2 can compress much better than that on some stuff
Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this context, by bzip did you actually meant bzip2? (There
is a archivers/bzip port.)
No, I presented bzip2-labeled test results and then made statements
about archivers/bzip. But I suppose they're true about bzip2 too.
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Gary W.
Swearingen thusly...
Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this context, by bzip did you actually meant bzip2?
(There is a archivers/bzip port.)
No, I presented bzip2-labeled test results and then made
statements about archivers/bzip.
Thanks
: to compress a dump, just
run dump with the -f - flag and pipe the output through your
favorite compression program (gzip, bzip2, bzip, compress). I
was responding to a question about the use of tar, which would be
pointless here.
Robin Smith
___
freebsd
Hello all,
I have got a lot of signal 11 on dmesg
pid 62519 (httpd), uid 398: exited on signal 11
I am sure it is software problem, since I just moved all the things to
a new servers and I still got these errors. So, I need to find the cause
of the problem, but I don't know where to start.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:08:35AM +0800, Pang wrote:
Hello all,
I have got a lot of signal 11 on dmesg
pid 62519 (httpd), uid 398: exited on signal 11
I am sure it is software problem, since I just moved all the things to
a new servers and I still got these errors. So, I need to find
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:37:08PM -0700, Danny Howard wrote:
All this great discussion got me researchinng. I haven't tried this
out but it looks like rsnapshot integrates a lot of features like this
into a single configurable, cronable script. It is in ports as well.
A lot of systems
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 11:35:35AM -0700, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
2) If all you have to deal with are static files and a
not-super-giant-filesystem, use rsync. rsync -avz --delete once a night
will mirror your data between drives or between machines without any
trouble. The only disadvantage
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Another useful rsync option is --link-dest:
--link-dest=DIR
This option behaves like --copy-dest, but unchanged files are
hard linked from DIR to the destination directory. The files
must be identical
performance just dump level 0 every night.
Or ... really it depends what you want and what you've got. Do you want
to be able to restore deleted files from the week prior? If not, then
you can get away with nightly full dump or nightly full mirror
strategies. Otherwise, yes, you need to rig up some
2) If all you have to deal with are static files and a
not-super-giant-filesystem, use rsync. rsync -avz --delete once a night
will mirror your data between drives or between machines without any
trouble. The only disadvantage is there is no file retention if you
want to restore a corrupt /
this right? Every time a dump of level N is, eh, taken,
earlier tapes of level N become obsolete and are free to go(*). In this
case, that happens every other time.
(*) Unless one would like to have those file versions around for a
longer time, of course.
Yes, that looks correct. Like I said
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Ryan
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 1:49 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: How to capture screen dump
Hi All
Is there anyway I can capture the screen dump mentioned below
Hi All
Is there anyway I can capture the screen dump mentioned below to help with
de-bugging...
Cheers and thanks in advance
Chris
-
Hi
We have a microstar model ms9211 1ru server with p4 1.3 512mb ram...
Mobo ms 9129 Ver 1
It boots all other cd's inc many other os's inc freeBSD
other for extra security.
Handbook reads dump(8) is the best backup program there is. So I am
giving it a try - only to find out that I don't understand at all the
meaning of that modified Tower of Hanoi algorithm descibed in the
manual page and elsewhere. The manual page says it is an efficient
From: Gayn Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:03:08 -0700
To: 'Chris Ryan' [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: How to capture screen dump
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Ryan
Sent
Ilari Laitinen wrote:
Handbook reads dump(8) is the best backup program there is. So I am
giving it a try - only to find out that I don't understand at all the
meaning of that modified Tower of Hanoi algorithm descibed in the
manual page and elsewhere. The manual page says it is an efficient
backup and there is
not a lot of data change between backups, then doing a full (leval 0)
dump once per week and a level 1 on other days would be fine.
If your filesystem is much bigger than your media or your data changes
a lot between backup, then you will want to implement a more complex
scheme
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
[ ...a good explanation snipped... ]
Personally I use a much shorter sequence: 0 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2. But
that's because I don't usually change vast amounts of data.
I would also consider doing your backups daily, not weekly as your
example
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 04:22:20PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Ilari Laitinen wrote:
Handbook reads dump(8) is the best backup program there is. So I am
giving it a try - only to find out that I don't understand at all the
meaning of that modified Tower of Hanoi algorithm descibed
Ilari Laitinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Handbook reads dump(8) is the best backup program there is. So I am
giving it a try - only to find out that I don't understand at all the
meaning of that modified Tower of Hanoi algorithm descibed in the
manual page and elsewhere. The manual page says
Alexander Shikoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I maked two dumps of root filesystem with dump(8):
- the first of level 0 (all files)
- the second of level 3 on the next day after level 0 (all files new or
modified since dump of level 0 or level 3)
Now I'm trying to restore filesystem
Hello,
I maked two dumps of root filesystem with dump(8):
- the first of level 0 (all files)
- the second of level 3 on the next day after level 0 (all files new or
modified since dump of level 0 or level 3)
Now I'm trying to restore filesystem with restore(8):
cat dump0 | (cd /mnt/ad0s1a
On 8/14/05, John Pettitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I tried to dump a 600gb file system a few days ago and it didn't
work. dump went compute bound during phase III and never wrote any
data to the dump device (this on an up to date
On 8/14/05, John Pettitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I tried to dump a 600gb file system a few days ago and it didn't
work. dump went compute bound during phase III and never wrote any
data to the dump device (this on an up to date RELENG_5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I tried to dump a 600gb file system a few days ago and it didn't
work. dump went compute bound during phase III and never wrote any
data to the dump device (this on an up to date RELENG_5 box). - is
this a known problem? Are there any work
Hi,
I've done a level 0 dump of a server which is spanned over several
tapes. Somehow, when I was labelling the tapes, I did something wrong
and have an extra tape in there. I'm wondering if there is some way to
find out what is on the tapes? I know I could do an ls to look at the
files
Sorry if this is a repeat. I posted this on the 21st and never saw it show up
in the mailing list, so I'm assuming nobody ever received it.
I have a question about dump and tape blocks. When I do backups, dump
tells me it uses a certain number of blocks for that particular
backup. I explicitly
on the number of blocks
dumped (I assume these blocks are the size I specify on the dump
command line). In fact, how can I calculate how many blocks my tape
can hold? (i.e. What is the biggest block number an 'mt rdhpos' or
'mt rdspos' will report for my tape?)
It'd be real useful to have
At 05:20 AM 7/25/2005, FreeBSD Questions wrote:
Sorry if this is a repeat. I posted this on the 21st and never saw it show up
in the mailing list, so I'm assuming nobody ever received it.
I have a question about dump and tape blocks. When I do backups, dump
tells me it uses a certain number
I have a question about dump and tape blocks. When I do backups, dump
tells me it uses a certain number of blocks for that particular
backup. I explicitly set my block size to 65K when I do a dump. When
I read the SCSI or hardware block location on the tape after the dump,
it's nowhere near
) with a page fault. Has
anyone met with this phenomena?
I'd like to show you some fancy backtracks, but as it all happened before
starting init, rc.conf settings won't help me in getting the dump.
What I've read:
the dump device can be hard-coded via the dump clause in the config(5)
line
Hi,
I am having some problems with firefox 1.0.4 and the helix real
player 10 plugin. Whenever I try and access a page which requires the
plugin firefox crashes and reports a core dump. Below is an entry from
/var/log/messages;
Jul 12 21:15:15 localhost kernel: pid 674 (firefox-bin
Hello,
Does anyone know if the dump and restore method for
moving a partition to a new disk requires the destination
partition to be as big or bigger that the source?
From my understanding, the whole partition, including
blank space will be dumped and restored. If this is the
case
Hello,
Does anyone know if the dump and restore method for
moving a partition to a new disk requires the destination
partition to be as big or bigger that the source?
It will need to be big enough to contain all the data.
It the old file system had a lot of empty (unused) space
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if the dump and restore method for
moving a partition to a new disk requires the destination
partition to be as big or bigger that the source?
It will need to be big enough to contain all the data.
It the old file system had a lot of empty
David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:05:48AM -0500, Brian John wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know of a utility that will get a webpage and dump the
output to standard out? I was going to use wget, but it dumps the
output to a file. Any ideas?
fetch -o - http://url
curl
you can also use Lynx with the -dump option.
Fred
Quoting David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:05:48AM -0500, Brian John wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know of a utility that will get a webpage and dump the
output to standard out? I was going to use wget, but it dumps
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with a SCSI hard drive. I dump all our
machines onto a nfs-mounted filer. There are some files which it's
important not to clobber during the dump, so I've been experimenting
with dump using the -L flag like so: dump auLf /var /mnt/dump/var
What I have noticed
intuition here.
Freminlins wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with a SCSI hard drive. I dump all our
machines onto a nfs-mounted filer. There are some files which it's
important not to clobber during the dump, so I've been experimenting
with dump using the -L flag like so: dump auLf /var /mnt
Hello,
Does anyone know of a utility that will get a webpage and dump the output
to standard out? I was going to use wget, but it dumps the output to a
file. Any ideas?
Thanks
/Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
--output-document=/dev/cuaa0 for example not work?
On 6/20/05, Brian John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know of a utility that will get a webpage and dump the output
to standard out? I was going to use wget, but it dumps the output to a
file. Any ideas?
Thanks
/Brian
Hello,
Does anyone know of a utility that will get a webpage and dump the output
to standard out? I was going to use wget, but it dumps the output to a
file. Any ideas?
Thanks
/Brian
Lynx is pretty easy to use for this:
lynx -dump http://www.google.com
--
Alan Gerber
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:05:48AM -0500, Brian John wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know of a utility that will get a webpage and dump the
output to standard out? I was going to use wget, but it dumps the
output to a file. Any ideas?
fetch -o - http://url
--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yet some other solutions:
with bash:
( printf 'GET / HTTP/1.0\n\n' 3 cat 03 ) 3
/dev/tcp/www.freebsd.org/80
with netcat:
printf 'GET / HTTP/1.0' | nc www.freebsd.org 80
Björn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
, leaving
the dump directory at its default /var/crash in /etc/defaults/rc.conf:
dumpdev=/dev/amrd0s1b (this is my swap partition)
savecore_flags=-z (added flag for compression)
Now, in /var/log/messages, I get:
savecore: unable to open bounds file, using 0
savecore: no dumps found
Am I right
:
...
Now, in /var/log/messages, I get:
savecore: unable to open bounds file, using 0
savecore: no dumps found
Did you get a dump? Otherwise the second message is normal. The
first one is harmless, and should only occur on the first real dump.
Am I right in assuming that the system's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, didn't get a dump. Everything's fine
on the system. I was just trying to follow
how to be prepared for a panic, crash, etc.,
to be able to do a backtrace and have info
to give someone trying to help debug the
kernel. First time I rebooted
/vi and one has to set
EDITOR=/mnt2/usr/bin/vi for disklabel to work. Is that a bug?
This also happens when I boot off disk1, enter fixit mode, and use
the live filesystem with disk2.
It is very easy to dump filesystems for backup, but it is not easy to
restore filesystems. (I am trying to do
/vi for disklabel to work. Is that a bug?
This also happens when I boot off disk1, enter fixit mode, and use
the live filesystem with disk2.
It is very easy to dump filesystems for backup, but it is not easy to
restore filesystems. (I am trying to do this all over ssh...not tape)
It is probably
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:18AM -0500, Viren Patel
wrote:
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems
to
a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like to take the backup file (var-200500516)
and
move it to tape
out
0 bytes transferred in 0.000786 secs (0 bytes/sec)
Since 'dump' works with /dev/nsa0 I am not sure what the
problem is.
I would expect the dd to work also. You may need to do
something
with blocksize.
But, we see that error a lot on different machines while
attempting
transfered the dump file to tape and then was able to
restore directly from tape. My test dump file was small
(140K) but today I plan to test with a full-size
multi-gigabyte dump file. I haven't played long with dd to
judge its reliability. While I was looking around, I also
came across sdd
tar and dump.
Are you absolutely certain that the tape device is not in use at the
time that the application receives the error?
Yes. It can even happen in single user. So far I have only had the
problem with various levels of DAT tapes. It has never failed that way
with DLTs.
jerry
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems to a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like to take the backup file (var-200500516) and
move it to tape (on the NFS server). However I'd like the
tape to have the data just as if it had
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:18AM -0500, Viren Patel wrote:
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems to a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like to take the backup file (var-200500516) and
move it to tape (on the NFS
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:18AM -0500, Viren Patel
wrote:
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems to
a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like to take the backup file (var-200500516) and
move it to tape (on the NFS
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:52:18PM -0500, Viren Patel wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:18AM -0500, Viren Patel
wrote:
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems to
a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:52:18PM -0500, Viren Patel
wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:18AM -0500, Viren Patel
wrote:
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems
to
a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:18AM -0500, Viren Patel
wrote:
Hello. I am using 'dump' to backup client filesystems to
a
disk file on an NFS mounted partition, e.g.
dump -0aLu -f /bk/var-20050516 /var
Now I'd like to take the backup file (var-200500516) and
move it to tape
. I am using
the .../backups directory to do a daily backup of selected directories from
the P4 box and I want to put my dumps from the in the .../dumps
directory. I read the man page for dump but I'm still a little unsure of
the proper way to use the command. Can someone suggest the best way
/usbdrive/dumps. I am using
the .../backups directory to do a daily backup of selected directories from
the P4 box and I want to put my dumps from the in the .../dumps
directory. I read the man page for dump but I'm still a little unsure of
the proper way to use the command. Can someone
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:28:04PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
dump 0auf /mnt/usbdrive/dumps/rootdump.20050510 /
might be what you want. That would get you a dump of the whole root
filesystem. If you have another file system such as /usr then a second
part like
dump
I am following this guide:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.html
and successfully dumped /, /usr, and /var over ssh to another box and
called them root-back.gz, usr-back.gz, and var-back.gz.
But I can't figure out the restore part. Let's say I replace the
On Friday 06 May 2005 15:34, Andy Firman wrote:
I am following this guide:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/backup-basics.htm
l and successfully dumped /, /usr, and /var over ssh to another box and
called them root-back.gz, usr-back.gz, and var-back.gz.
But I can't
Hi,
I compiled my FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE kernel with
options KDB, DDB
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
and wrote a kernel module that does nothing but call
panic() upon its loading, to try experimenting on
crash kernel debugger and crash dump.
Upon kldload the module, KDB was invoked and I was
dropped
Hi,
Need some reassurance on this:
# dump -h0 -0f - /usr | gzip /filelocation/filename.dump.gz
Will this produce a good dumpfile of /usr ? I mean, witghout gzip it
would have probably be something like dump -h0 -0f
/filelocation/filename.dump /tmp am I right?
Because I am a little short
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:47:59 +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
# dump -h0 -0f - /usr | gzip /filelocation/filename.dump.gz
Will this produce a good dumpfile of /usr ? I mean, witghout gzip it
would have probably be something like dump -h0 -0f
/filelocation/filename.dump /tmp am I right?
Because I
/i386 bootstrap loader. In effect I get a
register dump followed by BTX halted.
I've already changed/set/reset every possible setting in the BIOS,
changed the harddisk, used another memory - the problem remains the
same. Interestingly this system runs under Windows without any
problems.
BTW, I've
to the FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader. In effect I get a
register dump followed by BTX halted.
Hi,
I saw the same subject on the link bellow(try to disable DMA):
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-May/027279.html
---
Ciprian Badescu
When I do this:
huff@ dump 0 -L -a -u -f /dev/sa0 /usr
I get this:
huff@ ps -ax | grep dump
84349 p4 S+ 0:14.07 dump 0 -L -a -u -f /dev/sa0 /usr (dump)
84357 p4 S+ 1:39.84 dump: /dev/da1s1d: pass 4: 11.97% done, finished in 4
84358 p4 DL+0:32.80 dump 0 -L
Hi folks
I want to level 0 dump a remote partition onto a large local disk. There's not
enough space on the remote machine to dump to a file then sftp over. It needs
to dump via ssh.
any ideas? lokking for an elegant one-line solution
thanks!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:41:51PM +, John typed:
Hi folks
I want to level 0 dump a remote partition onto a large local disk. There's not
enough space on the remote machine to dump to a file then sftp over. It needs
to dump via ssh.
any ideas? lokking for an elegant one-line solution
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:41:51 +, John wrote
Hi folks
I want to level 0 dump a remote partition onto a large local disk.
There's not enough space on the remote machine to dump to a file
then sftp over. It needs to dump via ssh.
any ideas? lokking for an elegant one-line solution
remove it then ntpd starts perfectly.
This is rather odd as I still have a Linux box using the original file
with no problems. It is also add that the result is a core dump rather
than a nice error message in the syslog. But such is life.
Thanks again,
Rich
the original file
with no problems. It is also add that the result is a core dump rather
than a nice error message in the syslog. But such is life.
A newer version of ntpd has been imported since 5.2.1.
Given that it was a technology preview release,
maybe it's time to update the system
Richard Danter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I have 5.3-RELEASE installed. I'm trying to run ntpd but I get a
message in /var/log/messages that it exited on signal 11 (core dumped).
Is there a known problem with this version or is there somethig wrong
with my config file (below)?
Hi all,
I have 5.3-RELEASE installed. I'm trying to run ntpd but I get a message
in /var/log/messages that it exited on signal 11 (core dumped).
Is there a known problem with this version or is there somethig wrong
with my config file (below)? This file is based on one I use on a Linux
host
I'd like to get a crash dump and so
I added the following lines to /etc/rc.conf
dumpdev=/dev/ad0s1b
dumpdir=/usr/crash
-bash-2.05b# ls -ld /usr/crash/
drwx-- 2 root wheel 512 Feb 16 11:17 /usr/crash/
but I'm not getting any dump! /usr/crash is always empty.
..and the machine crashes quite
Ben Dover wrote:
Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page with
a Flash object Firefox core dumps. The error is as follows: Feb 13
18:57:53 w00f kernel: pid 27652 (firefox-bin), uid 0: exited on signal
6 (core dumped). I have installed the following relevant ports:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:48:18PM -0500, Ben Dover wrote:
Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page with
a Flash object Firefox core dumps. The error is as follows: Feb 13
18:57:53 w00f kernel: pid 27652 (firefox-bin), uid 0: exited on signal
6 (core dumped). I have
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:20:50 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:48:18PM -0500, Ben Dover wrote:
Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page with
a Flash object Firefox core dumps. The error is as follows: Feb 13
18:57:53 w00f
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:34:50 +0100, Darksidex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Dover escribió:
| Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page
| with a Flash object Firefox core dumps. The error is as follows:
| Feb 13
On 02/14/05 02:48, Ben Dover wrote:
Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page with
a Flash object Firefox core dumps. The error is as follows: Feb 13
18:57:53 w00f kernel: pid 27652 (firefox-bin), uid 0: exited on signal
6 (core dumped). I have installed the following
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:26:12AM -0500, Benjamin Dover wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:20:50 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:48:18PM -0500, Ben Dover wrote:
Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page with
a Flash object
Firefox is my browser of choice but every time I view a web page with
a Flash object Firefox core dumps. The error is as follows: Feb 13
18:57:53 w00f kernel: pid 27652 (firefox-bin), uid 0: exited on signal
6 (core dumped). I have installed the following relevant ports:
/usr/ports/www/firefox
FreeBSD thishost 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #3: Thu Feb 10 10:43:38
PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD64 amd64
This is a completely useless reply. I have had this problem for months.
All ports are current, running www/flashplugin-mozilla. i core dump in
both mozilla
I recently dumped a file to a local hard drive before
making some changes on the server. Shorty after
dumping, my hard drive died, and I attempted to
restore the files to a new hd. However, when I did
this, I got a checksum error, and a statement saying
Tape is not a dump tape. I'm guessing
these in the dump/restore process,
I'd love to know about it.
Thanks!
--
John Lind
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben Salem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:40:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Salem
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot dump. No dump device defined while using sysinstall
After booting w/ floppies, installation with
5.3-RELEASE
fails in /stand/sysinstall when using fdisk
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
John writes:
J If you are running FreeBSD 5.x, you get the cool L option on
J dump which will automatically snapshot the mounted filesystems.
What exactly is meant by a snapshot, and how much extra disk space
does
I have an ICH6 SATA RAID controller that I have set up with atacontrol to
behave as a RAID1 array. The array (ar0) consists of ad4 and ad6. Last
night I started a dump like so:
# dump -0Luaf /dev/da0s1 /
to *hopefully* dump my root filesystem (ar0s1a) to a usb storage device.
Now here is where
Hello!
I'm following the procedure in the NEW-HUGE-DISK FAQ entry to move my
system to bigger disks. In a nutshell, the dump/restore combo
recommended there seems painfully slow.
For example, I have newfs-ed the partition which is to become /usr with
the newfs default parameters and mounted
Toomas Aas wrote:
I'm following the procedure in the NEW-HUGE-DISK FAQ entry to move my
system to bigger disks.
How lame of me. I forgot to mention my OS version. It is 4.10-RELEASE-p5.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Toomas Aas wrote:
# cd /mnt/usr
# dump 0af - /usr | restore xf -
Are these speeds normal for dump, or am I missing something?
I would think not, but let's find out. When you are running the above
series of commands, can you instead do this:
# cd /mnt/usr
# mount
# dump 0af - /usr | restore xf
Derek wrote:
I would think not, but let's find out. When you are running the above
series of commands, can you instead do this:
# cd /mnt/usr
# mount
# dump 0af - /usr | restore xf -
# iostat -c10
Ooooh! And:
sysctl hw.ata
___
freebsd-questions
701 - 800 of 1069 matches
Mail list logo
