--As of February 9, 2012 6:36:00 AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com is alleged
to have said:
TWiki is a nightmare to update ...
TWiki was replaced with Foswiki (which is also in ports) at $WORK
a while back. Dunno why, or how much of a job the changeover was
for the admins, but there must have
David Brodbeck wrote:
> TWiki is a nightmare to update ...
TWiki was replaced with Foswiki (which is also in ports) at $WORK
a while back. Dunno why, or how much of a job the changeover was
for the admins, but there must have been some expected benefit to
justify the effort. The change was lar
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:54 PM, mikel king wrote:
> Unfortunately, WP isn't exactly a well designed CMS form the untaring
> standpoint.
Most aren't. TWiki is a nightmare to update, basically requiring you
to copy your old content to a new install and then hand-merge the new
system preference pa
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of February 7, 2012 5:59:27 PM -0500, mikel king is alleged to have said:
>
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a
--As of February 7, 2012 5:59:27 PM -0500, mikel king is alleged to have
said:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core files, but what ab
On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system. That
>> may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
>>
>> On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick wrote:
> I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system. That
> may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
>
> On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its files and
> yet, ports like Drupal or WordPress mak
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:37:17 -0600, wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its
files and yet, ports like Drupal or WordPress make th
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its files
and yet, ports like Drupal or WordPress make the files rwx for the owner
(www) as well as the
