Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 12:20 PM 12.20.2002 -0600, Chad Albert wrote: >> > >> > Beware of Quantum Fireballs -- bought two of the 40GBers and the jumpers >> > would NOT work properly -- according to the BIOS on several different >> > machines tried. Had to do the opposite of the diagrams for mastering, >but >> > slaves

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Chad Albert
> > > > Beware of Quantum Fireballs -- bought two of the 40GBers and the jumpers > > would NOT work properly -- according to the BIOS on several different > > machines tried. Had to do the opposite of the diagrams for mastering, but > > slaves would NOT work period on either one. One died after a c

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Jud
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:29:56 -0600, "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > At 11:18 AM 12.20.2002 +, David Gethings wrote: > >On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:15, Laszlo Vagner wrote: > >> western digital is notorious for that, what brand are you using? > >> > >> just curious. > >Maxtor something

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 11:18 AM 12.20.2002 +, David Gethings wrote: >On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:15, Laszlo Vagner wrote: >> western digital is notorious for that, what brand are you using? >> >> just curious. >Maxtor something-or-other. > >Dg > Beware of Quantum Fireballs -- bought two of the 40GBers and the jumpe

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread David Gethings
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:15, Laszlo Vagner wrote: > western digital is notorious for that, what brand are you using? > > just curious. Maxtor something-or-other. Dg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread David Gethings
Would you believe it was a jumper on the HD that was causing all the problems. The HD is setup as the primary IDE master, but the jumper settings on the HD were not configured as such. Once the correct jumper settings were in place fdisk behaved normally. I'd like to add that I bought the PC "as i

Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-14 Thread John Bleichert
On 13 Dec 2002, David Gethings wrote: > Date: 13 Dec 2002 17:15:17 + > From: David Gethings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: John Bleichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB > > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 14

Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-13 Thread David Gethings
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 14:41, John Bleichert wrote: > This can't be a bug or limitation in FreeBSD's fdisk, it must be a quirk > in your hardware (we've all seen them hehe!). Since 4.5, I've had FreeBSD > installed on several boxes with enormous hard drives in various > partitioning schemes with

Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-13 Thread John Bleichert
On 13 Dec 2002, David Gethings wrote: > Subject: Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB > > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 12:26, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > On 13 Dec 2002, David Gethings wrote: > > > > > If I can't get this to work I'm going to have to use Linux a

Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-13 Thread David Gethings
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 12:26, Konrad Heuer wrote: > On 13 Dec 2002, David Gethings wrote: > > > If I can't get this to work I'm going to have to use Linux as I know > > this works. :( > > If you know Linux fdisk recognizing the disk correctly, you can try to use > Linux fdisk to create a FreeBSD p

Re: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-13 Thread Konrad Heuer
On 13 Dec 2002, David Gethings wrote: > If I can't get this to work I'm going to have to use Linux as I know > this works. :( If you know Linux fdisk recognizing the disk correctly, you can try to use Linux fdisk to create a FreeBSD partition, can't you? You should than be able to use the partit

fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-13 Thread David Gethings
Hi, I'm having a problem with the version of fdisk supplied with FreeBSD 4.6.2 (and I'm seeing the same problem on 4.7 too). fdisk always defaults to 256/255/63 for the C/H/S values of my disk, however this is not the correct values. After searching through the FAQ's and handbook I found some inf