Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Mark Moellering
On Friday 09 November 2007 4:20 pm, John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, which does not work on many sites. To get Flash 9, you need to use wine under freebsd and install the windows

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Tino Engel
Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, which does not work on many sites. To get Flash 9, you need to use wine under

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Engel wrote: Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, which does not

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Tino Engel wrote: freebsdangel# setenv PATH ${PATH}:/usr/compat/linux/lib you are looking for LD_LIBRARY_PATH You should do this with ldconfig so its there all the time; but use the linux compat one, not the freebsd base system one. The port should have done this for you. cat

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Tino Engel
Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Engel wrote: Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-11 Thread icantthinkofone
Tino Engel wrote: icantthinkofone wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:53:40AM +, Tino Engel wrote: icantthinkofone wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
icantthinkofone wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Chuck Robey
Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite

flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread John
I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. It made me recall, in reading up on

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. It made me recall,

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread icantthinkofone
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread icantthinkofone
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: John wrote: I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok,