How to enable PAE in freebsd 8.0 i386

2011-11-05 Thread Nazir
Hi, I'm just to know how to / step / the best practice recompile kernel with PAE support in freebsd 8.0 i386 Ahmad Nazir b Haron Pusat Teknologi Maklumat Universiti Malaysia Terengganu___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

FreeBSD 8.0 - PHP 5.3.x

2011-10-06 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all, Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ? I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling will do it? Any advice, samples would be appreciated, -Grant

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 - PHP 5.3.x

2011-10-06 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 06/10/2011 16:55, Grant Peel wrote: Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ? I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling will do it? Any advice, samples would be appreciated 8.0 is out of

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 - PHP 5.3.x

2011-10-06 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 06/10/2011 16:55, Grant Peel wrote: Hi all, Short of upgrading the OS, what is the safest way to upgrade a FreeBSD server to PHP 5.3.x from 5.2.11 ? I am assuming downloading the ports tarball and rebuilding and reinstalling will do it? Any advice, samples would be appreciated, -Grant

Re: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2

2011-02-25 Thread Valentin Bud
: On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote: Hi, Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel? In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable

Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2

2011-02-24 Thread nikitha
Hi, Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel? In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable parameter in freeBSD? Your earliest reply in this regard is much appreciated. Thanks for any

Re: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2

2011-02-24 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote: Hi, Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel? In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable parameter in freeBSD? Your earliest reply in this regard

RE: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2

2011-02-24 Thread Gary Gatten
-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of nikitha Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:01 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2 Hi, Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2

Re: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2

2011-02-24 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote: Hi, Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel? In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable parameter

Re: Tuning routing table size in FreeBSD 8.0 and 7.2

2011-02-24 Thread nikitha
wrote: Hi, Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel? In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable parameter in freeBSD? [snip] I could not find a sysctl that matched what you're

Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0

2010-09-29 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I put after the dollar sign??? it means you have to sent some dollars to FreeBSD fundation

Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0

2010-09-29 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, September 29, 2010 a las 01:07:26PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar escribió: I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I put after the dollar sign??? it means you have

Booting up FreeBSD 8.0

2010-09-28 Thread William Lang
I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I put after the dollar sign??? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0

2010-09-28 Thread Steven Friedrich
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 1:52:56 pm William Lang wrote: I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I put after the dollar sign

Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0

2010-09-28 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:52 AM, William Lang wrote: I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I put after the dollar sign??? You're at a Unix shell prompt. I suspect the resources here

FreeBSD 8.0 and KDE Fonts

2010-07-14 Thread What you get is Not what you see
On 8.0 with KDE 4.3.1 package installed I have problems with Firefox fonts. Though I installed URW and freetype fonts according to handbook and declared them on xorg.conf, Firefox 3.5.4 cant display some pages properly,ie text is not displayed. So that must be a problem with fonts, because those

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-06 Thread RW
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:28:29 +0100 Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote: I suspect whoever you were talking to probably has more of a clue than I do. As a quick data point, I just ran portsnap fetch update while another process did a df /var; sleep 1 loop and /var increased by about 30MB

syslog strangeness on freebsd 8.0 and 8.1-RC

2010-07-05 Thread Vikash Badal
Can someone please assist me with some strangeness on FreeBSD 8.0 and 8.1-RC2 using a threaded test code code, I see the that freebsd 8.x seems to be using more memory when using the syslog() call from a c program: Results: 7.2 without syslog PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote: Henrik, When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition. When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)
On 02.07.2010 09:33, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote: Henrik, When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition. When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread krad
On 2 July 2010 08:33, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/07/2010 22:29:54, Ed Flecko wrote: Henrik, When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition. When I installed the kernel and starting running

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Robert Huff
krad writes: all i can say is your a brave boy 8) A 1 TB+ / slice would take ages to fsck. For ages being less than ten (fifteen ?) minutes on a modern system with reasonable memory ... ... which should be necessary very rarely. Even on my test system, time between

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:33:45 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Is it time for me to start advocating one big partition again? This may not be the consensus view, but I have found that for a quiet life and general lack of botheration it helps to create *only two*

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:29:54PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote: Henrik, When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition. When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to and see if I have

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Arthur Chance
On 07/02/10 13:13, Bruce Cran wrote: I have a task on my TODO list to increase the sizes of the partitions in sysinstall: for example / goes to 1GB, /var to 4GB. I hope to commit the code in the next couple of weeks. As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why 4GB for

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Robert Huff
Arthur Chance writes: As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why 4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't really enough, and then decided to make /var bigger than the Handbook

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0100 Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote: As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why 4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as I'd found out from a previous install that 512MB wasn't really enough, and

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-02 Thread Arthur Chance
On 07/02/10 15:38, Bruce Cran wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:04:10 +0100 Arthur Chancefree...@qeng-ho.org wrote: As a matter of idle curiosity with a bit of education thrown in, why 4GB for /var? The last time I installed a new machine I made / 1GB as I'd found out from a previous install that

/boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Ed Flecko
Hi folks, I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration when I did the install. I've taken the following steps: # csup -4 /etc/stable

FreeBSD 8.0 failes to start

2010-07-01 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
hello my os fails to start,this is the error and also my keyboard doesn't work Root mount waiting for: usbus3 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad2s2a ROOT MOUNT ERROR: If you have invalid mount options, reboot, and first try the following from the loader prompt: set

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Chip Camden
On Jul 01 11:24, Ed Flecko wrote: Hi folks, I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration when I did the install. I've taken

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Ed Flecko
Thanks guys. :-) Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root (512M) isn't quite big enough? Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs) to eliminate this problem? Ed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes: I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then redo 'make installkernel', and all seems OK.

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Ed Flecko
Chip, That sounds like a smart thing to do; can you tell me more about how to do that (or point me to a www resource; I'm happy to read more about that). :-) Ed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread James Bailie
running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0 Hi folks, I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration when I did the install. I've taken

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Chip Camden
On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes: I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting it, I just 'rm -r /boot/kernel.old' when it fails and then

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Chip Camden
On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote: Thanks guys. :-) Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root (512M) isn't quite big enough? Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs) to eliminate this problem? Ed

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes: On Jul 01 15:10, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes: I've experienced the same thing on amd64 -- the default partition size for root is too small. Rather than going to the trouble of correcting it, I just

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes: On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote: Thanks guys. :-) Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root (512M) isn't quite big enough? Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs) to eliminate this

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Anders Andersson
A healthy fear, indeed. For one thing, I'd certainly rather have someone do rm /boot/kernel.old/*.ko than rm -r /boot/kernel.old. Being even more selective is an obvious extension... Why not move the old useless kernel to another drive. Sure if the system kernel fails and you need the old

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Ed Flecko
Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why not make the / partition maybe 1G? I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine a slightly larger / partition would impact performance that

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread krad
On 1 July 2010 21:12, Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com wrote: Since it would be smart to have at least one known, good kernel, why not make the / partition maybe 1G? I know the smaller the / partition, the better the performance (since it's the first partition of the drive), but I can't imagine

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Henrik Hudson
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes: On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote: Thanks guys. :-) Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root (512M) isn't quite big enough? Should I make the partition size

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:24:46AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote: Hi folks, I'm running FreeBSD 8.0, and I'm trying to simple stay current with all security patches. It's a clean install of FreeBSD 8.0 on a 50G drive, and I let sysinstall select the default partition configuration when I did

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:07:50PM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote: Thanks guys. :-) Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root (512M) isn't quite big enough? Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs) to eliminate this problem? Many people find

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Ed Flecko
Henrik, When I FIRST installed 8.0, I did create a separate /home partition. When I installed the kernel and starting running out of space in / , I thought O.K...I'll let FreeBSD make the partition sizes IT wants to and see if I have the same problem, and I did. Apparently, 512M is just, not,

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Robert Huff
Henrik Hudson writes: Or just make one large partition. Not on a server, but I don't see much reason for using multiple partitions on a laptop. Multiple partitions still isn't a bad idea if you ever have to fsck and even on a desktop / laptop I usually mount /tmp as noexec.

Re: /boot is full after running make installkernel on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-07-01 Thread Chip Camden
On Jul 01 12:29, Chip Camden wrote: On Jul 01 12:07, Ed Flecko wrote: Thanks guys. :-) Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root (512M) isn't quite big enough? Should I make the partition size slightly larger (on future installs) to eliminate this

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/2010 04:42:21, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD ... s/always/almost / If one wanted to download a copy of the ports tree as

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-28 Thread krad
On 28 June 2010 07:14, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28/06/2010 04:42:21, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-28 Thread Grant Peel
- Original Message - From: Balázs Mátéffy repcs...@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:42 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3 Hi, Maybe portsnap fetch extract ? Maybe the tag in your supfile was wrong for the ports. MB

FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-27 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all, When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty. What is the best way to get them back? -Grant ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-27 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi, Maybe portsnap fetch extract ? Maybe the tag in your supfile was wrong for the ports. MB. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/06/2010 19:38:43, Grant Peel wrote: When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty. What is the best way to get them back? Fix your ports supfile: for ports you

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-27 Thread krad
On 27 June 2010 22:14, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/06/2010 19:38:43, Grant Peel wrote: When I ran CVSUp last time I seemed to have lost all ports accept the newest ones. i.e. almost all the port dirs are empty.

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-27 Thread perryh
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Fix your ports supfile: for ports you /always/ want HEAD ... s/always/almost / If one wanted to download a copy of the ports tree as it existed when, say, 6.1 was released, specifying the corresponding tag would be the way to get it.

threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-06-11 Thread Vikash Badal
Greetings. I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely In a worker thread, I have the following. CODE--- LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst)); free(inst); LogMessage(DEBUG_0, after free allocated %ld,

Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-06-11 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 11), Vikash Badal said: I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely In a worker thread, I have the following. CODE--- LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst)); free(inst); LogMessage(DEBUG_0, after

RE: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-06-11 Thread Vikash Badal
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dan Nelson Sent: 11 June 2010 09:56 PM To: Vikash Badal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0 The fix

Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-06-11 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 11), Vikash Badal said: -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- The fix is to remove your second call to malloc_usable_size(z)). Then neither version will crash. Also, a useful habit to start is to

Re: minicom freebsd 8.0

2010-06-08 Thread akash kumar
. From: C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws To: akash kumar akashb...@yahoo.co.in Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wed, 2 June, 2010 3:36:54 PM Subject: Re: minicom freebsd 8.0 On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM, akash kumar akashb...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hi, I was referring

FreeBSD 8.0 linux emulator kernel panic

2010-06-06 Thread Bogdan Webb
I'm having issues with the Fedora Core6 linux emulator on FreeBSD 8.0 it panics when i run HLDS, the same issue was addressed by Daniel Ballenger in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/054646.htmlbut i did not get the fix. Giovanni Trematerra gave a response

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 linux emulator kernel panic

2010-06-06 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Sunday 06 June 2010 19:31:00 Bogdan Webb wrote: I'm having issues with the Fedora Core6 linux emulator on FreeBSD 8.0 it panics when i run HLDS, the same issue was addressed by Daniel Ballenger in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/054646.html but i did not get

Issues reinstalling Bind9 on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-06-03 Thread Bogdan Webb
Ok i'll make it short coz it's the 2nd time i write this -.-' and don't even ask why :D So here it goes: Fresh FreeBSD 8.0 install, installed bind97 to witch i have busted up the named.conf fine and tought, at the time, that deleting the whole content of /etc/namedb and reinstalling the bind port

Re: Issues reinstalling Bind9 on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-06-03 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/sbin/named /etc/rc.d/named ans /usr/sbin/named are not from the ports but from native FreeBSD distribution. Portsx will go into /usr/local/ only. So apparently you mixed-up distribution and port, deleted part of one and part of the

Re: Issues reinstalling Bind9 on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-06-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2010 16:51:09, Olivier Nicole wrote: /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/sbin/named /etc/rc.d/named ans /usr/sbin/named are not from the ports but from native FreeBSD distribution. Portsx will go into

minicom freebsd 8.0

2010-06-02 Thread akash kumar
Hi, Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0. I have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine. Thanks, Akash. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: minicom freebsd 8.0

2010-06-02 Thread Fbsd1
akash kumar wrote: Hi, Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0. I have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine. Thanks, Akash. I take it a minicom is a external serial modem for internet access over the phone lines. First

Re: minicom freebsd 8.0

2010-06-02 Thread akash kumar
...@yahoo.co.in Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wed, 2 June, 2010 2:02:30 PM Subject: Re: minicom freebsd 8.0 akash kumar wrote: Hi, Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0. I have a serial to usb converter running between my board and host machine. Thanks

Re: minicom freebsd 8.0

2010-06-02 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: akash kumar wrote: Hi, Can some one help me with the steps configuring minicom on freebsd 8.0. I have a serial to usb converter running between my  board and host machine. Thanks, Akash. I take it a minicom

Re: minicom freebsd 8.0

2010-06-02 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM, akash kumar akashb...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hi, I was referring to minicom command similar to one on linux. On linux the config file is /etc/minirc.configfile and the  Serial Device is  /dev/ttyUSB0, which was working for me. On freebsd  the config file is

Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-25 Thread Anoop Kumar Narayanan
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote: In the last episode (May 22), Anoop Kumar Narayanan said: I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory immediately.  So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the process's address

threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-21 Thread Vikash Badal
Greetings. Excuse me if this is a stupid questions. I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely In a worker thread, I have the following. CODE--- LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst)); free(inst); LogMessage(DEBUG_0,

Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 21), Vikash Badal said: Excuse me if this is a stupid questions. I have a thread socket application that seems to be behaving strangely In a worker thread, I have the following. CODE--- LogMessage(DEBUG_0, allocated %ld, malloc_usable_size(inst));

Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-21 Thread Anoop Kumar Narayanan
I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the process's address space but present in the free pool and so it doesn't crash. -Anoop On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com

Re: threads and malloc/free on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 22), Anoop Kumar Narayanan said: I think glibc uses asynchronous free, as in it doesn't free the memory immediately. So even though the memory is free'd its still part of the process's address space but present in the free pool and so it doesn't crash. FreeBSD

increasing memory for no root users on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-20 Thread Vikash Badal
Can someone assist me with tunning freebsd 8.0 so that I can allocate more memory to a process that is not owned by root or running as root. From top I get this line before it coredumps. PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 1161 nntpd 1500 440

increasing memory for no root users on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-20 Thread Robert Huff
Vikash Badal writes: Can someone assist me with tunning freebsd 8.0 so that I can allocate more memory to a process that is not owned by root or running as root. man (5) login.conf ?? Robert Huff

Re: increasing memory for no root users on freebsd 8.0

2010-05-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Vikash Badal vikash.ba...@is.co.zawrote: Any idea where I'm going wrong ? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/users-limiting.html -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

freeBSD 8.0

2010-05-11 Thread Chohwora
Hello, I am trying to download freeBSD version 8.0 I would like to find out, for a complete installation of a freeBSD 8.0. how many disks does it contain? I mean does it have disk1, disk2, etc? After downloading in ISO image, how do I burn it on a Cd so that it can be installed as a bootable

Re: freeBSD 8.0

2010-05-11 Thread Aiza
Chohwora wrote: Hello, I am trying to download freeBSD version 8.0 I would like to find out, for a complete installation of a freeBSD 8.0. how many disks does it contain? I mean does it have disk1, disk2, etc? After downloading in ISO image, how do I burn it on a Cd so that it can

Re: freeBSD 8.0

2010-05-11 Thread Matthew Seaman
:40, Chohwora wrote: I am trying to download freeBSD version 8.0 I would like to find out,for a complete installation of a freeBSD 8.0. how many disks does it contain? I mean does it have disk1, disk2, etc? You only need the disk1 CD .iso image to have everything you need to install FreeBSD

RT 3.8.6 web page wont display after configuration on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-05-10 Thread Pamela Pomary
Hello, I have installed rt3.8.6 with apache2-modperl2 on freebsd 8.0. I have configured RT_SiteConfig.pm and /apache22/Includes/http-local.conf files as directed by RT's wiki website http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/UserManual. I get the following message when i want to launch the web page http

Re: RT 3.8.6 web page wont display after configuration on FreeBSD 8.0

2010-05-10 Thread Joseph Olatt
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 09:14:13AM -, Pamela Pomary wrote: Hello, I have installed rt3.8.6 with apache2-modperl2 on freebsd 8.0. I have configured RT_SiteConfig.pm and /apache22/Includes/http-local.conf files as directed by RT's wiki website http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/UserManual

Re: KSE (Kernel Supported Threading) support in FreeBSD 8.0

2010-05-04 Thread Ivan Voras
On 05/04/10 00:38, Bruce Cran wrote: On Monday 03 May 2010 15:52:48 Traiano Welcome wrote: Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)? No. KSE support was removed over 2 years ago: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-March/084248.html Note that only KSE

Re: KSE (Kernel Supported Threading) support in FreeBSD 8.0

2010-05-04 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 05/04/10 00:38, Bruce Cran wrote: [...] Note that only KSE was removed; threading is of course fully supported by other mechanisms. Does anyone know of a paper(s) that compare the different threading model of say FBSD,

KSE (Kernel Supported Threading) support in FreeBSD 8.0

2010-05-03 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi List Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)? Thanks in Advance, Traiano Welcome NOTE: This e-mail message and all attachments thereto contain confidential information intended for a specific addressee and purpose. If you are not the addressee (a) you may not disclose, copy

Re: KSE (Kernel Supported Threading) support in FreeBSD 8.0

2010-05-03 Thread Bruce Cran
On Monday 03 May 2010 15:52:48 Traiano Welcome wrote: Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)? No. KSE support was removed over 2 years ago: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-March/084248.html -- Bruce Cran

FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 Xen DomU vcpus = 2 issue

2010-04-27 Thread Yuriy Kohut
/sbin/init get Segmentation Fault while FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 i386 Xen DomU is booting. Xen Dom0 info: OS: CentOS release 5.4 (Final) Arch: x86_64 Kernel: 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:48:13 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148

FreeBSD 8.0 with geom_journal and fsck

2010-04-22 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Hi, Is realy necessary check fsck on boot for journaled file sistem? Can I put this line in fstab? # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad0s3d.journal/var/db ufs rw,async0 0 I can't boot if set Dump, Pass to 2 2 im

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 with geom_journal and fsck

2010-04-22 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 22/04/2010 16:10, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, Is realy necessary check fsck on boot for journaled file sistem? Yes, but it should be a very quick check, see these for some more details http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2008-August/003020.html

Re: FreeBSD 8.0 with geom_journal and fsck

2010-04-22 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Em 22/04/2010 16:33, Vincent Hoffman escreveu: On 22/04/2010 16:10, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, Is realy necessary check fsck on boot for journaled file sistem? Yes, but it should be a very quick check, see these for some more details

NFS Mount FreeBSD 8.0

2010-04-15 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all, I have been running a backups storage server for many years on FreeBSD 5.2.1. It has been and still is working fine. Several 6.x machines are connected to it on the local network. Since installing FreeBSD 8.0 on two machines (they used to run 6.x and connected to the nfs mount

Re: NFS Mount FreeBSD 8.0

2010-04-15 Thread Ivan Voras
On 04/15/10 15:35, Grant Peel wrote: Hi all, I have been running a backups storage server for many years on FreeBSD 5.2.1. It has been and still is working fine. Several 6.x machines are connected to it on the local network. Since installing FreeBSD 8.0 on two machines (they used to run 6.x

Re: NFS Mount FreeBSD 8.0

2010-04-15 Thread Grant Peel
192.168.0.0 - Original Message - From: Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:19 AM Subject: Re: NFS Mount FreeBSD 8.0 On 04/15/10 15:35, Grant Peel wrote: Hi all, I have been running a backups

Re: NFS Mount FreeBSD 8.0

2010-04-15 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote: Ivan, I actually just got it to work. Not sure why the default TCP no longer works but I added the -U flag to the fstab for the mount and it works. Anyone know what may bave changed in FreeBSD 8 to cause this? -Grant

pyglet segfaults on FreeBSD 8.0/amd64/nVidia

2010-04-15 Thread Giuseppe Pagnoni
Hi Michael, thanks for replying. Unfortunately changing the driver to the nv one does not work since nv does not support GLX which is required by pyglet. I appreciate your suggestion, though. cheers, giuseppe -- Giuseppe Pagnoni Dip. Scienze Biomediche Sezione Fisiologia Univ. di Modena

pyglet segfaults on FreeBSD 8.0/amd64/nVidia

2010-04-14 Thread Giuseppe Pagnoni
) on a FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 box, running the latest version of the ports' nvidia driver (nvidia-driver-195.36.15). I found that I cannot use either font.Text or text.label without causing segfaults. Here is some sample code that makes python crash: - SNIPPET 1 import pyglet luxi = pyglet.font.load

Re: pyglet segfaults on FreeBSD 8.0/amd64/nVidia

2010-04-14 Thread Jorge Medina
installed pyglet from the ports (latest version as of yesterday, py26-pyglet-1.1.2_1) on a FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 box, running the latest version of the ports' nvidia driver (nvidia-driver-195.36.15).  I found that I cannot use either font.Text or text.label without causing segfaults.  Here is some sample

Re: pyglet segfaults on FreeBSD 8.0/amd64/nVidia

2010-04-14 Thread Michael Powell
as of yesterday, py26-pyglet-1.1.2_1) on a FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 box, running the latest version of the ports' nvidia driver (nvidia-driver-195.36.15). I found that I cannot use either font.Text or text.label without causing segfaults. Here is some sample code that makes python crash: - SNIPPET 1

  1   2   3   4   >