On Friday 23 June 2006 08:08, John Nielsen wrote:
On Friday 23 June 2006 00:46, Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Thursday 22 June 2006 23:16, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
generally, how risky of an operation is it to change the branch im
On Friday 23 June 2006 00:46, Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Thursday 22 June 2006 23:16, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
generally, how risky of an operation is it to change the branch im
following
(assuming i have a server in good
generally, how risky of an operation is it to change the branch im following
(assuming i have a server in good working order)?
i think i would now prefer to start following RELENG on my production servers
instead of STABLE (not that im having any issues), so that i can keep up with
On Jun 22, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
generally, how risky of an operation is it to change the branch im
following
(assuming i have a server in good working order)?
i think i would now prefer to start following RELENG on my
production servers
instead of STABLE (not that im
On Thursday 22 June 2006 23:16, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
generally, how risky of an operation is it to change the branch im
following
(assuming i have a server in good working order)?
i think i would now prefer to start
Maybe I've been lucky, but I've never had problems upgrading from one
version to another, as long as it's a supported jump. Most of those
have also been remote upgrades without going to single user mode. I
just upgraded a couple 5.4-STABLE boxes to 6.1-RELEASE, and it went
without a hitch.I
