--- Paul Marciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You couldn't do 100Mb/s with em on a 100Mb/s
> line
> > with min packets, because there are gaps
> between
> > packets so its impossible.
>
> Thanks for the detailed reply Danial.
>
> By 100Mbps I mea
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You couldn't do 100Mb/s with em on a 100Mb/s line
> with min packets, because there are gaps between
> packets so its impossible.
Thanks for the detailed reply Danial.
By 100Mbps I mean line-rate: 148809 packets/sec for
64-byte Ethernet frames + IPG an
--- Paul Marciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am running FreeBSD-5.4 on a 3GHz P4 with two
> Intel
> fxp NICs running IP forwarding with polling
> enabled.
>
> For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am
> getting
> 100Mbps throughput port to port.
>
> For min-size packets (64 byte
On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Paul Marciano wrote:
For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am getting
100Mbps throughput port to port.
For min-size packets (64 bytes) I am only seeing
around 60Mbps. Increasing HZ and the polling
parameters does not help.
You should be aware that the minimum 64-b
Hello.
I am running FreeBSD-5.4 on a 3GHz P4 with two Intel
fxp NICs running IP forwarding with polling enabled.
For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am getting
100Mbps throughput port to port.
For min-size packets (64 bytes) I am only seeing
around 60Mbps. Increasing HZ and the polling
parame
