Re: geli overhead?

2013-02-07 Thread RW
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:25:33 +0100 mhca12 wrote: > Does skipping authentication also remove the requirement of > zeroing the whole eli disk for the checksums? It's not needed from that perspective, but it makes it a bit more secure if you do that or fill the device from /dev/random before the ini

Re: geli overhead?

2013-02-05 Thread mhca12
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:44 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:25:33PM +0100, mhca12 wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, dweimer wrote: >> > On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote: >> >> >> >> Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as >> >> described earlier? > >> >> Whe

Re: geli overhead?

2013-02-04 Thread mhca12
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, dweimer wrote: > On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote: >> >> Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as >> described earlier? >> >> $ df -h >> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/ada0p3.eli127G6.9G119G 5

Re: geli overhead?

2013-02-04 Thread dweimer
On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote: Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as described earlier? $ df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ada0p3.eli127G6.9G119G 5%/ devfs 1.0k1.0k 0B 100%/dev /dev/gp