Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 01:21:46PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > James Harrison writes: > > > One example that comes to mind is the CUPS port. It installs its > > own version of the lpr binary in /usr/local/bin. However, there's > > also an instance of lpr, the BSD version, in /usr/bin. So how do

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Mike Jeays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On January 7, 2008 12:04:39 pm Mike Bristow wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:50:47AM -0600, Erik Osterholm wrote: > > > The '.' notation for the current working directory enables you to add > > > the current directory you happen to be in as par

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Robert Huff
James Harrison writes: > One example that comes to mind is the CUPS port. It installs its > own version of the lpr binary in /usr/local/bin. However, there's > also an instance of lpr, the BSD version, in /usr/bin. So how do > you make sure you're using the CUPS version of the binary? > > T

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Mike Jeays
On January 7, 2008 12:04:39 pm Mike Bristow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:50:47AM -0600, Erik Osterholm wrote: > > The '.' notation for the current working directory enables you to add > > the current directory you happen to be in as part of your path (thus > > making it searched when executi

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Mike Bristow
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:50:47AM -0600, Erik Osterholm wrote: > The '.' notation for the current working directory enables you to add > the current directory you happen to be in as part of your path (thus > making it searched when executing a command), however this has serious > security implciat

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread James Harrison
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 10:50 -0600, Erik Osterholm wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:13:39AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: > > > This is a sort of 'don't shoot yourself in the foot' design. You > > > cannot run a script or binary simply by name if you're cwd is the > > > directory that contains that

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Erik Osterholm
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:13:39AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: > > This is a sort of 'don't shoot yourself in the foot' design. You > > cannot run a script or binary simply by name if you're cwd is the > > directory that contains that script or binary. IIRC, you can't cd / > > usr/bin and run anyt

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Jim Bow
Hey Steve, Steve Franks wrote: Ah! You'd think any one of the many tutorials I read would have mentioned that little detail ;) Tutorials do have a tendency to look over important details. That's why I would always recommend a good book, something like UNIX Power Tools in your case, which,

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Josh Carroll
> How are you running the commands? The problem is probably to do with your > path. Your home directory isn't typically and shouldn't be in your PATH (try > echo $PATH). You need to specify the full path to your scripts or place a ./ > in front of the script name if in the same directory. > > e.g.

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Josh Carroll
> I keep reading about making sh scripts executable with #!/bin/sh on > the first line and chmod to executable. That works with all my system > scripts (rc, etc.) or my system would be DOA, no doubt. When I do it > in my home folder, however, running

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Steve Franks
> This is a sort of 'don't shoot yourself in the foot' design. You > cannot run a script or binary simply by name if you're cwd is the > directory that contains that script or binary. IIRC, you can't cd / > usr/bin and run anything in /usr/bin without explicitly calling that > file with the ./ te

Re: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Crist
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Steve Franks wrote: I keep reading about making sh scripts executable with #!/bin/sh on the first line and chmod to executable. That works with all my system scripts (rc, etc.) or my system would be DOA, no doubt. When I do it in my home folder, however, running

home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Robert Huff
Steve Franks writes: > I keep reading about making sh scripts executable with #!/bin/sh on > the first line and chmod to executable. That works with all my system > scripts (rc, etc.) or my system would be DOA, no doubt. When I do it > in my home folder, however, running

RE: home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Barry Byrne
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Franks > Sent: 07 January 2008 15:53 > I keep reading about making sh scripts executable with #!/bin/sh on > the first line and chmod to executable. That works with all my system > scripts (rc

home dir executable (!/bin/sh, chmod+x) shell scripts won't run without "sh

2008-01-07 Thread Steve Franks
I keep reading about making sh scripts executable with #!/bin/sh on the first line and chmod to executable. That works with all my system scripts (rc, etc.) or my system would be DOA, no doubt. When I do it in my home folder, however, running