Hi all
My news computer just arrive ;-) The cpu is a AMD 64 FX 55.
I've try to install FreeBSD 53-amd64 but the hard drive is SATA and the
boot hang when he detect the drive.
The install work with FreeBSD 53-i386.
I think i can, with many effort, find a another DD with IDE interface, but
my que
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:05:37 +0100, Albert Shih wrote
> Hi all
>
> My news computer just arrive ;-) The cpu is a AMD 64 FX 55.
>
> I've try to install FreeBSD 53-amd64 but the hard drive is SATA and the
> boot hang when he detect the drive.
>
> The install work with FreeBSD 53-i386.
>
> I think
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:19:24AM +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:05:37 +0100, Albert Shih wrote
> > Hi all
> >
> > My news computer just arrive ;-) The cpu is a AMD 64 FX 55.
> >
> > I've try to install FreeBSD 53-amd64 but the hard drive is SATA and the
> > boot hang when he
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 08:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Jorn Argelo wrote:
>
> >Well, some things that are keeping me from the AMD64 version of FreeBSD is
> >the lack of support for several programs. Including cvsup, and I don't
> >know any other way to sync the ports-tree or the kern
Jorn Argelo wrote:
Well, some things that are keeping me from the AMD64 version of FreeBSD is the
lack of support for several programs. Including cvsup, and I don't know any
other way to sync the ports-tree or the kernel sources. But that was with 5.2.
1. I am not sure if FreeBSD still lacks cvsu
I would like to be able to setup a system so that on power up I can
choose weather to boot into either i386 or amd64.
Is this possible or would I some how have to install the two releases on
their own?
No matter what I do above I would also like to be able to have a user
log in no matter which
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:19:15 -0400
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to be able to setup a system so that on power up I can
> choose weather to boot into either i386 or amd64.
> Is this possible or would I some how have to install the two releases on
> their own?
afaik it would hav
Someone broke the silence:
> I would like to be able to setup a system so that on power up I can
> choose weather to boot into either i386 or amd64.
> Is this possible or would I some how have to install the two
> releases on
> their own?
>
> No matter what I do above I would also like to be abl
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to be able to setup a system so that on power up I can choose
> weather to boot into either i386 or amd64.
> Is this possible or would I some how have to install the two releases on
> their own?
I'm fairly sure it could be done, but you'd have to
On 2005-09-10 17:29, "Haulmark, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Someone broke the silence:
>> I would like to be able to setup a system so that on power up I can
>> choose weather to boot into either i386 or amd64.
>> Is this possible or would I some how have to install the two
>> releases on th
I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64. Mainly because the machine has 8GB of memory
and I don't like the PAE limitations.
I've done this a couple of times before with 4.x -> 6.x but all remained
i386.
Are there any pitfalls when doing an upgrade
Just had a new 64bit server installed at the colo, but they accidentally
installed a i386 ISO, instead of an AMD64 one ... is it possible to build
/ install an amd64 world, or do I have to re-install from a proper ISO
first ?
Thanks ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Ser
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:05:12AM +0100, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
> I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
> 7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64. Mainly because the machine has 8GB of memory
> and I don't like the PAE limitations.
>
> I've done this a couple of times before with 4
Btw, yes I know that it might (or will) brake currently existing apps, I
have to save the /etc/fstab /etc/master.passwd files etc.
I'm just wondering if I end up with a system that can boot the old
filesystem and sshd will run so I can recompile all the ports on the
machine in the new architecture
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:05:12AM +0100, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
>> I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
>> 7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64. Mainly because the machine has 8GB of memory
>> and I don't like the PAE limitations.
>>
>> I've done this a co
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:05:12 +0100, Frederique Rijsdijk
wrote:
> I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
> 7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64.
Just to follow up on my quest here..
The upgrade went fine. Most ports were broken as expected. I gave up trying
to recompile everything
Yes, in fact it's pretty simple, quoting /usr/src/Makefile:
# If TARGET_ARCH=arch (e.g. ia64, sparc64, ...) is specified you can
# cross build world for other architectures using the buildworld target,
# and once the world is built you can cross build a kernel using the
# buildkernel target.
Just
'k, I knew about cross-compiling, just wasn't sure if it was that simple
to upgrade the system being cross-compiled onto ... thanks ...
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Leo Mrafko wrote:
Yes, in fact it's pretty simple, quoting /usr/src/Makefile:
# If TARGET_ARCH=arch (e.g. ia64, sparc64, ...) is speci
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 02:18, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 'k, I knew about cross-compiling, just wasn't sure if it was that simple
> to upgrade the system being cross-compiled onto ... thanks ...
I don't think it is that simple. I'd search the amd64 list if I were you.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, RW wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 02:18, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
'k, I knew about cross-compiling, just wasn't sure if it was that simple
to upgrade the system being cross-compiled onto ... thanks ...
I don't think it is that simple. I'd search the amd64 list if I we
Yes, I've done it a few months ago.. Just read through the files.. As far
as I remember you need to build amd64 world, then kernel, installworld,
installkernel, reboot, voila, it works.. I had some small problems which I
don't remember now, you will able to solve them for sure. Maybe don't
forget t
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Leo Mrafko wrote:
Yes, I've done it a few months ago.. Just read through the files.. As far
as I remember you need to build amd64 world, then kernel, installworld,
installkernel, reboot, voila, it works.. I had some small problems which I
don't remember now, you will able to
Hi,
I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
>Dear TeXLive team,
>I created 6 sets of FreeBSD binaries of TeXLive2009, for FreeBSD 6, 7
>and 8, each for i386 and amd64:
> http://anthesphoria.net/FreeBSD/TeXL
Hello.
I have an Intel Pentium4 Cpu with EMT64 and have installed
7.0-CURRENT-200701-amd64-disc1.iso on my 120GB sata disk.
I have a second sata disk that i use for transfers.
I tried experimenting with GPT on this second disk and i want to ask some
questions.
Originally, i had setup the disk us
acheron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
>
> http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
>
>
This is great news, thanks for sharing. I was looking forward to get
TexLive 2009 running on FreeBSD.
_
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:30:48 +0200, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> acheron wrote:
>> I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
>>
>> http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
>
> This is great news, thanks for sharing. I was looking forward to get
> TexLive 200
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
> >
> > http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
> This is great news, thanks for sharing. I was looking forward to get
> TexLive 2009 running on FreeBSD.
Absolutely, have either of you tried it
> You can build your own binaries by tweaking an svn checkout of the
> TeXlive sources. I've done this on my laptop, because I run CURRENT
> and the old TeXlive 2008 binaries failed to run:
> I think I kept notes while building the binaries. If I manage to find
> them soon-ish I will post a f
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to
not care
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman
wrote:
> Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to
> not care
>
>
> Leandro F Silva wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
&g
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
>
> And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
> 7 source under the GPL.
>
> Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
Actually, we *could*. The problem is the definition of "enough". I'm
su
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
>>
>> And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
>> 7 source under the GPL.
>>
>> Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
>
> Actually, we
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
7 source under the GPL.
Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
Rolf G Nielsen writes:
> > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a
> FreeBSD version of that crap?
Is your objection to Flash in particular, or to any product in
> --
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:28:29 +0100
> From: "Lucian @ lastdot.org"
> Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID:
> <5a3c8f45091008k
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than
> Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow,
> at least as far as Video streaming is concerned.
Oh, thank goodness. Flash vid
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:56:53AM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
>
> Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD
> version of that crap?
If you s/Free/Open/ I think the question answers itself.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:04:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Rolf G Nielsen writes:
>
> > > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
> >
> > Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a
> > FreeBSD version of that
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:01:07AM -0700, James Phillips wrote:
>
> I have this fantasy that if I design and build a better streaming video
> format, "They" (broadcasters) will use it, if properly marketed.
It may be a fantasy, but as fantasies go, it's not a bad one.
>
> This would be despite
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Leandro F Silva wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
>
> http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
>
>
I voted
gather some more signatures from recent subscribers.
Cheers
herb langhans
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:25:53PM -0300, Leandro F Silva wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> We just have to create an account and voting
>
> Message: 29
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600
> From: Chad Perrin
> Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700, anti_spam256@ wrote:
Message: 29
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600
From: Chad Perrin
Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra>
Content-Type: text
-- Leandro F Silva wrote :
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questi...@free... mailing
Leandro F Silva wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with
the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port, doesn't it?
Works for me, at least.
> We just have to create an
--- On Sun, 10/4/09, jhell wrote:
> From: jhell
> Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
> To: "James Phillips"
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:07 PM
>
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Leandro F Silva wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
>
> The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with
> the Linux flash bina
I'm sure someone has done this before but I wanted to run my plan past
everyone to see if I've thought of everything.
Yesterday one of our development servers (running FreeBSD 6-release) croaked.
It was an old old old machine and we ended up replacing the board and CPU
with an MSI Neo2 Platinu
50 matches
Mail list logo
