Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-11 Thread Michel Talon
Martin Cracauer wrote: > Interesting you have lower performance in SBCL. Are you comparing a > 64 bit SBCL with a 32 bit CMUCL? Is your SBCL binary (whichever > bitcount) compiled with thread support? I have a 32 bits machine, and i was using the FreeBSD sbcl port without changing any compiling

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-11 Thread Martin Cracauer
Michel Talon wrote on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:34:33AM +0200: > Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL > > binaries, BTW. > > There are "recent" cmucl binaries built here: > http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/ >

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-11 Thread Michel Talon
Martin Cracauer wrote: > Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL > binaries, BTW. There are "recent" cmucl binaries built here: http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/ for freebsd 7 and freebsd 8. I think this is for x86, not x86-64 but they sho

lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread C. P. Ghost
Hello Martin, *, the port lang/cmucl has a dependency on a very old libutil, libc and libm: % lisp /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libutil.so.5" not found, required by "lisp" % which lisp /usr/local/bin/lisp % ldd `which lisp` /usr/local/bin/lisp: libutil.so.5 => not found (0x0)

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread Douglas Thrift
Hello, I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug for this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146680 Hope this helps

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Thrift wrote: > Hello, > > I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should > actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while > back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug > for this: http

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread Martin Cracauer
Douglas Thrift wrote on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:27:25PM -0700: > Hello, > > I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should > actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while > back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug > for th