Hi ,
For keep up to date FreeBSD I think all people are using source update
method ( When I sent a message to list almost everybody adviced this ) Only
one person said that binary update but this is not recommanded because
compiled version always work better and I saw that compile update progr
> I'm just wonder Why patching is not used instead of source update..
> it's patching source tree too for security bugs ... I checking output of the
> cvsup -g -L 2 stable-supfile command . it's only download openssh , bind and
> like this almost what writen in security advisories .
Personally
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> For keep up to date FreeBSD I think all people are using source update
> method ( When I sent a message to list almost everybody adviced this ) Only
> one person said that binary update but this is not recommanded because
> compiled versi
