After a reboot of my FreeBSD 8.0-p4 system
a vmstat shows:
Mon Aug 23 08:40:00 CEST 2010
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi pofr sr da0 pa0 in sy cs us
sy id
1 1 0 1515M 7118M 816 5 5 0 726 0
On 08/23/10 11:50, n dhert wrote:
After a reboot of my FreeBSD 8.0-p4 system
a vmstat shows:
Mon Aug 23 08:40:00 CEST 2010
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi pofr sr da0 pa0 in sy cs us
sy id
1 1 0
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:37:03 +0800 at
Jason lisen1...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,all:
which one is the memory size?And what's the meaning of these three variable?
hw.physmem: 2138476544
hw.usermem: 1886236672
hw.realmem: 2147430400
___
freebsd-questions
On Friday 06 August 2010 18:48:30 Daniel C. Dowse wrote:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:37:03 +0800 at
Jason lisen1...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,all:
which one is the memory size?And what's the meaning of these three
variable?
hw.physmem: 2138476544
hw.usermem: 1886236672
hw.realmem: 2147430400
hi,all:
which one is the memory size?And what's the meaning of these three variable?
hw.physmem: 2138476544
hw.usermem: 1886236672
hw.realmem: 2147430400
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 8/3/10, Jason lisen1...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,all:
which one is the memory size?
This would depend on what you want to find out, the total memory, the
amount available to the system and what is allocated for the user?
And what's the meaning of these three variable?
hw.physmem: 2138476544
I try both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC official memstick images. I try write them to
memory stick by that commands:
# dd if=memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=10240
# dd if=memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=512
I also try to write image from Windows by win32diskimager-RELEASE-0.2-r23-win32
I think all was writen
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 316, Issue 8, Message: 18
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:12:28 +0400 Alexender ag...@yandex.ru wrote:
I try both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC official memstick images. I try
write them to memory stick by that commands:
# dd if=memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=10240
# dd
Hi,
I was trying to build root filesystem in to the kernel (i.e using /dev/md0) for
Mips based target boards. In the process i built tool chain and kernel
successfully.
But when i boot the kernel on the target, it fails to mount the md0 and drops
to mountroot prompt.
mountroot ufs:/dev/md0
...@gmail.com
To: akash kumar akashb...@yahoo.co.in
Sent: Fri, 18 June, 2010 7:50:14 AM
Subject: Re: mountroot error with memory based rootfs
On 6/17/10, akash kumar akashb...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to build root filesystem in to the kernel (i.e using /dev/md0)
for Mips based target boards
I have the same problem when I want to upgrade libtool from 15 to 22,
thanks.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Olivier Nicole
olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
Hi,
Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several ports
upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several ports.
The error message looks like:
/usr/local/bin/xz: /usr/ports/distfiles//libpng-1.4.1.tar.xz: Memory usage
limit reached
/usr/local/bin/xz: Limit was 46 MiB, but 65 MiB would
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 03:57:28 Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several ports.
The error message looks like:
/usr/local/bin/xz: /usr/ports/distfiles//libpng-1.4.1.tar.xz: Memory
Hi,
Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several ports.
The error message looks like:
/usr/local/bin/xz: /usr/ports/distfiles//libpng-1.4.1.tar.xz: Memory usage
limit reached
/usr/local/bin/xz: Limit was 46 MiB
I have the same problem when I want to upgrade libtool from 15 to 22,
thanks.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Olivier Nicole
olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
Hi,
Since I upgraded that machine from 6.x to 7.3 I am hitting a memory
limit with xz when trying to build/upgrade several ports
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
guys,
my wife emptied a bunch of files onto her memory stick; the pc
is not here. i have never used one of these devices before and
want to know how, if it is possible, to read her dos/lose
material from my bsd system
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
Hello all,
Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like this:
Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k buffers
Swap: 4192924k total, 0k used, 4192924k free
Hello all,
Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like this:
Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k buffers
Swap: 4192924k total,0k used, 4192924k free, 1214052k cached
on FreeBSD:
Mem: 48M Active, 945M Inact, 190M Wired, 112M
On Thu, 27 May 2010 11:52:15 +0200
Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
Hello all,
Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like
this:
Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k
buffers Swap: 4192924k total,0k used, 4192924k free
guys,
my wife emptied a bunch of files onto her memory stick; the pc
is not here. i have never used one of these devices before and
want to know how, if it is possible, to read her dos/lose
material from my bsd system. 7.3, dell, plenty of disk, and yes,
i know where the usb slot it!
do i
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:03:42PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
my wife emptied a bunch of files onto her memory stick; the pc
is not here. i have never used one of these devices before and
want to know how, if it is possible, to read her dos/lose
material from my bsd system. 7.3
On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:03:42 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
guys,
my wife emptied a bunch of files onto her memory stick; the pc
is not here. i have never used one of these devices before and
want to know how, if it is possible, to read her dos/lose
material from my bsd
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:03:42PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
my wife emptied a bunch of files onto her memory stick; the pc
is not here. i have never used one of these devices before and
want to know how, if it is possible, to read her dos/lose
material from my bsd system. 7.3
Can someone assist me with tunning freebsd 8.0 so that I can allocate more
memory to a process that is not owned by root or running as root.
From top
I get this line before it coredumps.
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
1161 nntpd 1500 440
Vikash Badal writes:
Can someone assist me with tunning freebsd 8.0 so that I can
allocate more memory to a process that is not owned by root or
running as root.
man (5) login.conf ??
Robert Huff
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Vikash Badal vikash.ba...@is.co.zawrote:
Any idea where I'm going wrong ?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/users-limiting.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I was wondering about the memory indications displayed at boot time. For
example:
# dmesg| grep memory
real memory = 51539607552 (49152 MB)
avail memory = 49663688704 (47362 MB)
The real memory is the size of the RAM modules in this computer (48 Gb).
What's avail memory? The memory
Stepping = 2
Features=0x183f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR
/ MEMORY STUFF /
real memory = 704905216 (672 MB)
avail memory = 18116608 (17 MB) === why? is it a sysctl?
/ MEMORY STUFF /
kbd1 at kbdmux0
acpi0: COMPAQ CPQB0B5 on motherboard
Fixed. The 440BX is not friendly to 512MB SDR sticks.
Works like a charm with 3x256MB'ers!
Thank you,
Brodey Dover
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Brodey Dover dover...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that the avail memory was memory that was
released from BIOS.
Top indicates
On Mar 29, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Aiza wrote:
This is the procedure you want to follow.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11680
And for greater detail
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11715
Thanks for the links. I will give them a try.
Jay
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:49:08 -0500, Jay Hall jh...@socket.net wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have been asked to explore the possibility of booting FreeBSD from a
memory stick. This was not a problem; worked great when installed from
the distribution CD.
What would be the best way to get
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have been asked to explore the possibility of booting FreeBSD from a
memory stick. This was not a problem; worked great when installed
from the distribution CD.
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
Thanks,
Jay
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Jay Hall wrote:
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This is what I have done, but now I cannot mount the memory stick.
I create an image of the s1a partition where the kernel I want to copy
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Jay Hall wrote:
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
OK, I managed t get our custom configuration on to the memory stick
using dump. After getting everything configured, what I thought was
correctly, I am
Jay Hall wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have been asked to explore the possibility of booting FreeBSD from a
memory stick. This was not a problem; worked great when installed from
the distribution CD.
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick
On Thursday 18 March 2010 18:28:48 Jayadev Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I
couldn't find the port which it is coming
from yet.
Thanks
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I couldn't
find the port which it is coming
from yet.
Thanks,
Jayadev
On 03/18/10 10:28, Jayadev Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I couldn't
find the port which it is coming
from yet.
Thanks,
Jayadev
On Thu 18 Mar 2010 at 18:30:00 PDT J. Johnston wrote:
On 03/18/10 10:28, Jayadev Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I couldn't
find the port
Hi to all;
I am trying to get the most precise reading I can of all free memory (8-
STABLE).
I am using
/usr/bin/vmstat | grep -a 2 | awk '{print $5}'
But I'm not sure if this reflects ALL free memory.
Would anyone have a more precise place to read free memory from?
Thanks
--
Mario Lobo
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
I am trying to get the most precise reading I can of all free memory (8-
STABLE).
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by free memory.
I am using
/usr/bin/vmstat | grep -a 2 | awk '{print $5}'
But I'm not sure if this reflects ALL
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by free memory.
Free physical memory available.
Add the -H flag to get that value more precise. I suspect, however,
that precision isn't really the right term for what you're
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by free
memory.
Free physical memory available.
Add the -H flag to get that value more
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:51:33 Brandon Gooch wrote:
I'm also seeing something similar although perhaps not related to
(lack of) free memory. Are you able to enable debugging in the kernel
and maybe get a (text)dump?
I can't ! The machine freezes completely !! NOTHING works when the freeze
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by free
memory.
Free physical memory available.
Add the -H flag to get that value more precise. I
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 20:31:04 Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by free
memory.
Free physical memory
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:03:03 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
First, you'll need a precise definition of what you mean by free memory.
Free physical memory available.
Not precise enough to have a clear answer. Does it have to be zeroed
already, or do clean
a different
reason for wanting to know this, but I can assure you my lockups aren't
due
to a lack of memory from the host anyways. I have an order of magnitude
more free memory(according to top) in my hosts than my VM requires when
it's running and it still locks on every csup attempt.
Mem
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:51:33 Brandon Gooch wrote:
I'm also seeing something similar although perhaps not related to
(lack of) free memory. Are you able to enable debugging in the kernel
and maybe get a (text)dump?
I can't ! The machine
I think this only applicable to amd64. You might have a
different reason for wanting to know this, but I can assure you my
lockups aren't
due
to a lack of memory from the host anyways. I have an order of
magnitude more free memory(according to top) in my hosts than my VM
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
Understood now, Adam.
I have no FBSD VM, but just about every other OS vms. LeoOSx, Win7(3264),
Several XPs, several 2003, Fedora and even an OS/2 warp. They all work. In
fact, LeoOsx and Win7 (32) are up as I type this.
Does FreeBSD malloc library provide any API way to know how many bytes
are currently allocated by the current process?
Memory image size isn't adequate, since it's always much larger because
of various reasons, like an extra-memory allocated for the needs of
malloc library itself an also due
What's the simplest/easiest way to use secure memory (i.e., memory that
won't be written to a swap partition) from within a program (written in
Ruby in this case) on FreeBSD?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgphqNJQhPZ33.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Feb 19, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
What's the simplest/easiest way to use secure memory (i.e., memory that
won't be written to a swap partition) from within a program (written in
Ruby in this case) on FreeBSD?
Well, Ruby supports calling C functions, so you can invoke mlock
swapping:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/swap-encrypting.html
Thanks for pointing out a couple of options. I'll look into them. I've
also discovered that there appears to be a way to lock memory natively in
Ruby, though, I haven't checked into that in too much depth yet. I will
weigh my
I am asking out of curiosity.
'top' describes the memory state on my machine like this:
Mem: 1085M Active, 196M Inact, 301M Wired, 36M Cache, 112M Buf, 1366M Free
Swap: 16G Total, 757M Used, 16G Free, 4% Inuse
There is enough space in memory to load back all swap. Is there a
command to do
In response to Yuri y...@rawbw.com:
I am asking out of curiosity.
'top' describes the memory state on my machine like this:
Mem: 1085M Active, 196M Inact, 301M Wired, 36M Cache, 112M Buf, 1366M Free
Swap: 16G Total, 757M Used, 16G Free, 4% Inuse
There is enough space in memory to load back
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:24:15PM -0800, Yuri wrote:
I am asking out of curiosity.
'top' describes the memory state on my machine like this:
Mem: 1085M Active, 196M Inact, 301M Wired, 36M Cache, 112M Buf, 1366M Free
Swap: 16G Total, 757M Used, 16G Free, 4% Inuse
There is enough space
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0600
John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:24:15PM -0800, Yuri wrote:
I am asking out of curiosity.
'top' describes the memory state on my machine like this:
Mem: 1085M Active, 196M Inact, 301M Wired, 36M Cache, 112M Buf,
1366M Free
I know that 32-bot Linux can see something like 3.6GB.
Is this possible on FreeBSD?
I see this message in system log:
real memory = 6442450944 (6144 MB)
avail memory = 3123482624 (2978 MB)
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
In response to Yuri y...@rawbw.com:
I know that 32-bot Linux can see something like 3.6GB.
Is this possible on FreeBSD?
I see this message in system log:
real memory = 6442450944 (6144 MB)
avail memory = 3123482624 (2978 MB)
Most systems usually see about 3.5G ... don't know why FreeBSD
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:02:17PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Yuri y...@rawbw.com:
I know that 32-bot Linux can see something like 3.6GB.
Is this possible on FreeBSD?
I see this message in system log:
real memory = 6442450944 (6144 MB)
avail memory = 3123482624 (2978
of
the address space for example.
This doesn't seem like a good idea that video memory is always mapped to
system memory. What if one day graphics card gets 4GB RAM? Then we won't
even be able to have 32-bit OS working with such card and in 64-bit OS
4GB of memory would be grossly wasted
with 256MB of RAM on it will use (at least) 256MB of the
address space for example.
This doesn't seem like a good idea that video memory is always mapped to
system memory. What if one day graphics card gets 4GB RAM? Then we won't even
be able to have 32-bit OS working with such card and in 64
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to create a
memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am looking for
is something like mount_mfs -F, but that does not modify the actual
file. I know what I could easily to this by copying the content of the
file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to create a
memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am looking for
is something like mount_mfs -F, but that does not modify
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to create a
memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am looking for
is something like mount_mfs -F
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:12:22 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 14:53, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I would like to know if there is a mount command that allows to
create a memory disk that can
a memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am
looking for is something like mount_mfs -F, but that does not
modify the actual file. I know what I could easily to this by
copying the content of the file to the memory disk, but I am
looking for a solution that can be configured via fstab
if there is a mount command that allows to
create a memory disk that can be initialized from a file. What I am
looking for is something like mount_mfs -F, but that does not
modify the actual file. I know what I could easily to this by
copying the content of the file to the memory disk, but I am
looking
operations as far as I can see.
By this do you mean that I would need to copy the whole content of the
read-only filesystem to the memory disk?
Yes.
I looked at the man page for mount_unionfs and there is a big warning
saying that it is a bad idea to use it, so I guess I will pass
as two separate
operations as far as I can see.
By this do you mean that I would need to copy the whole content of the
read-only filesystem to the memory disk?
Yes.
I looked at the man page for mount_unionfs and there is a big warning
saying that it is a bad idea to use it, so
I'd like to access the digital media slots on my laptop.
Specifically, I want to read Sony Memory Sticks.
pciconf -lv shows the devices:
no...@pci0:11:0:3: class=0x018000 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8033104c rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)'
device = 'PCIxx11
On Friday 29 January 2010 23:14:06 Steven Friedrich wrote:
I'd like to access the digital media slots on my laptop.
Specifically, I want to read Sony Memory Sticks.
pciconf -lv shows the devices:
no...@pci0:11:0:3:class=0x018000 card=0x3082103c chip=0x8033104c rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
I've been poking around /etc/rc.diskless and other rc's. I can't seem
to find what script loads the md.
Its not in /etc/fstab
Does anyone know where it is?
Also how does nanobsd load the /etc into the md? newfs + cpio?
Regards
David N
___
In message: 4d7dd86f1001130347k75ec7dcfhf6adf2a852210...@mail.gmail.com
David N david...@gmail.com writes:
: I've been poking around /etc/rc.diskless and other rc's. I can't seem
: to find what script loads the md.
: Its not in /etc/fstab
:
: Does anyone know where it is?
: Also how
2010/1/14 M. Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com:
In message: 4d7dd86f1001130347k75ec7dcfhf6adf2a852210...@mail.gmail.com
David N david...@gmail.com writes:
: I've been poking around /etc/rc.diskless and other rc's. I can't seem
: to find what script loads the md.
: Its not in /etc/fstab
This has probably been discussed before, so apology for
asking the same question again.
Should the Active memory, as reported by top(1), be equal to the
sum of rss (the real memory (resident set) size of the process)
of all processes, as reported by ps(1)?
The sum of ps(1) rss fields is probably
Hi--
On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Should the Active memory, as reported by top(1), be equal to the
sum of rss (the real memory (resident set) size of the process)
of all processes, as reported by ps(1)?
No. They aren't measuring the same thing; in a system
Manish Jain wrote:
I am looking for a convenient way using C to retrieve the current CPU
and memory utilization of a process of which I have the pid. Can
somebody please give me a hint of which system-calls/library-functions
to use for this ? I don't want to use the system() function or grep
I am looking for a convenient way using C to retrieve the current CPU
and memory utilization of a process of which I have the pid. Can
somebody please give me a hint of which system-calls/library-functions
to use for this ? I don't want to use the system() function or grep for
information via
Hello,
I am looking for a convenient way using C to retrieve the current CPU
and memory utilization of a process of which I have the pid. Can
somebody please give me a hint of which system-calls/library-functions
to use for this ? I don't want to use the system() function or grep
wrote:
I have a FBSD 6.4p7 box that I use as a mail server - 1Go RAM - RAID1
Works quite well.
As I plan to put 100 more mail accounts soon on the server I was
wondering if the memory swap was ok on the server considering these
figures:
last pid: 18956; load averages
Hello,
I have a FBSD 6.4p7 box that I use as a mail server - 1Go RAM - RAID1
Works quite well.
As I plan to put 100 more mail accounts soon on the server I was
wondering if the memory swap was ok on the server considering these
figures:
last pid: 18956; load averages: 0.04, 0.11
bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote:
Hello,
I have a FBSD 6.4p7 box that I use as a mail server - 1Go RAM - RAID1
Works quite well.
As I plan to put 100 more mail accounts soon on the server I was
wondering if the memory swap was ok on the server considering these
figures:
last pid
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 09:58:36AM +0200, bsd wrote:
Hello,
I have a FBSD 6.4p7 box that I use as a mail server - 1Go RAM - RAID1
Works quite well.
As I plan to put 100 more mail accounts soon on the server I was
wondering if the memory swap was ok on the server considering
In the last episode (Oct 01), Bill Moran said:
bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote:
I have a FBSD 6.4p7 box that I use as a mail server - 1Go RAM - RAID1
Works quite well.
As I plan to put 100 more mail accounts soon on the server I was
wondering if the memory swap was ok on the server
was
wondering if the memory swap was ok on the server considering these
figures:
last pid: 18956; load averages: 0.04, 0.11, 0.05 up 19+08:36:23
09:53:38
125 processes: 1 running, 124 sleeping
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 1.5% system, 0.4% interrupt, 98.1% idle
Mem: 499M
List,
Maybe I'm just not that bright, but I have a question regarding the following:
man 3 getenv
snip
Successive calls to setenv() or putenv() assigning a differently sized
value to the same name will result in a memory leak. The FreeBSD seman-
tics for these functions (namely
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:43:57 -0600, Modulok modu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm just not that bright, but I have a question regarding the following:
man 3 getenv
snip
Successive calls to setenv() or putenv() assigning a differently sized
value to the same name will result in a memory leak
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something
memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage live, this is a production
box?
I've
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 23:19:23 Michael David Crawford wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as Active. Maybe one
gig is accounted for,
I'm not that familiar with FreeBSD
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 23:19:23 Michael David Crawford wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as Active. Maybe one
gig is accounted for,
I'm not that familiar
Hello,
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory does not show
In the last episode (Sep 01), Bill Moran said:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as Active. Maybe one
gig is accounted for,
I'm not that familiar with FreeBSD yet, but the kernel uses memory which
might not be charged against any
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se:
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory
201 - 300 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
