: Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?
On 4/24/07, Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all who pointed out the obvious PAE option...
When I went to rebuild the kernel I got this message:
+++
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
.
PAE is an awful hack, BTW. I've heard a number of people complain that
performance sucks under PAE.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:44 AM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Memory 3.5GB
, 2007 11:55 AM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: 'Andy Greenwood'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Memory 3.5GB not used?
In response to Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time.
Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install
Jonathan Horne wrote:
i have a system with 4GB memory, doing the same similar behavior. but, on top
of not using the last few hundred megs of ram, even the POST shows like 3.6 or
3.7GB of ram. is PAE still a solution for my case?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dmesg | grep memory
real memory
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I never had this problem before when I built the kernel the first time.
Could my module source be corrupt? If so, how do I re-install just the
kernel sources for 6.1?
Not all modules work with PAE. Read the example PAE kernel
.
In short, PAE is worse, but not horribly so.
Does this test demonstrate usage of memory over 4G? It's my understanding
that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G (which
is the problem it's intended to solve)
If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing
of memory over 4G? It's my understanding
BM that PAE starts to suffer when it has to look at the memory over 4G (which
BM is the problem it's intended to solve)
BM If your entire test fits in under 4G, you're not seeing the worst of it.
BM At least, that's my understanding of the issue.
Don't
5: Out of memory (Needed 14154840 bytes)
when dumping table `Attachments` at row: 24285
mysql Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.24, for portbld-freebsd5.3 (i386)
mysqldump Ver 10.9 Distrib 4.1.12, for portbld-freebsd5.3 (i386)
and
mysqldump Ver 9.11 Distrib 4.0.24, for portbld-freebsd5.3 (i386
My setup seems to have a memory leak of some kind and I'm not sure how to
track it down
When I first start up the system and all the processes start the machine has
1GB in free memory... After running for 20-30 minutes the free memory drops
to somewhere around 20MB... The longer it runs
Hello Don,
I got the following tips when I asked the same question a while back:
Consider something like the valgrind port or dlmalloc.
---Chuck
I ran them and gdb and I'm still hunting that memory leak. In my case I
first suspected threads (software) to be the cause however as the chase
On Mar 21, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Don O'Neil wrote:
My setup seems to have a memory leak of some kind and I'm not sure
how to
track it down
When I first start up the system and all the processes start the
machine has
1GB in free memory... After running for 20-30 minutes the free
memory
In the last episode (Mar 15), Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri said:
Hello,
I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it.
*sigh*
This happened since like 6 months I don't
Hello,
I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it. *sigh*
This happened since like 6 months I don't know why? it was okay before that.
here is the top info
last pid:
months I don't know why? it was okay before that.
Your running processes are trying to use more memory than is present
in your system, so swapping is the only possibility.
Look at the VSZ column (virtual size) to see how overloaded your
system is.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT
Hi.
I experimented with the values:
1) On my machine 'maxusers' doesn't influence the maximum memory
allowable for allocation for single process.
2) 'maxdsiz' - Yes, as long as I keep 'maxdsiz + maxssiz' below physical
memory size - everything is fine. Single process allocates
On Mar 12, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Dima Sorkin wrote:
2) 'maxdsiz' - Yes, as long as I keep 'maxdsiz + maxssiz' below
physical
memory size - everything is fine. Single process allocates
successfully
up to 'maxdsiz'.
When tried to put 'maxdsiz' phys mem size,
indeed
:
It is certainly possible to configure FreeBSD to allow a single
process to access more memory than is phyiscally installed. For
example, I have a machine with 512MB of RAM, and set:
kern.dfldsiz=1G
...in /boot/loader.conf, and this works just fine. Admittedly, when
a process does exceed 512MB
On Mar 12, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Dima Sorkin wrote:
Something is probably wrong.
kern.dfldsiz on my machine does not influence.
I don't believe you can change that value after the system has
booted-- you have to set it either in the kernel's config file, or
in /boot/loader.conf, for this to
Hi.
Great. After some tries 2.9GB was the maximum that it works
with. Ok with me.
--RESOLVED--
About 'dfldsiz' - I meant that I've set it in /boot/loader.conf
via 'su -' , and rebooted the machine. It didn't influenced.
(It was the first try today, may be I did something wrong, though.)
But the
Hi.
I've read some pages about 'kern.maxusers', 'kern.maxdsize'.
I have questions:
1)
After I reduce 'maxusers' to some reasonable amount for that computer (say 10),
and enlarge 'maxdsize', will a user process be able to allocate
arrays that are considerably bigger than the physical memory size
arrays that are considerably bigger than the physical memory size ?
This is what I really need. I run processes in which it can come to
1.5x-2x ratio.
Yes, upto kernel limits...
2) Following the
http://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID1/40543.html#1
Should I put maxdsize == phys mem
Hi.
On FreeBSD 6.2 i386 with 2GB of physical memory I can't allocate
more than 500Mb for my program.
I'm a new to FreeBSD. Is this limitatin is something known,
how do I overcome it ?
(On linuxes I can allocate arrays of size close to sum
of physical and swap memory, on similar machines
check out your sysctl values.
man sysctl
for more information.
-Derek
At 08:32 AM 3/9/2007, Dima Sorkin wrote:
Hi.
On FreeBSD 6.2 i386 with 2GB of physical memory I can't allocate
more than 500Mb for my program.
I'm a new to FreeBSD. Is this limitatin is something known,
how do I
Dima Sorkin wrote:
Hi.
On FreeBSD 6.2 i386 with 2GB of physical memory I can't allocate
more than 500Mb for my program.
I'm a new to FreeBSD. Is this limitatin is something known,
how do I overcome it ?
Google for MAXDSIZ and relevent discussions.
See here for example:
http
Dima,
Not all the settings there are tuneable. In 6.X the allowable memory is
somewhat automatic based on the max users. Your kernel is set to 384. You
can try changing that.
You can also make some kernel settings in:
/boot/loader.conf
You can see the possible variables to set in:
/boot
-)
after cat spits out 2.18 GB (in the same spot every time), after
restore creates a number of directories (but no files), I get the
error:
no memory to extend symbol table
abort? [yn]
I fixed this by adding the following to my kernel config:
options MAXDSIZ=(1024*1024*1024)
options MAXSSIZ
I tend to visit Opera's Desktop team blog to see what new features are
going to be in the next release of the Opera browser. And one
interesting tid-bit was:
Added Shared X memory. Should now be quite a bit faster
And beneath this note was:
Note: On FreeBSD shared memory doesn't work
_ADR
acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR
cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0
cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0
acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0
pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0
pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.1 (no driver
lveax wrote:
hey all,
i found some error msg from dmesg,what does these mean?
acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR
Nothing serious - it probably makes no sense to even display this message.
pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
pci0: memory, RAM at device 0.1 (no driver
On 2/9/07, Яцко Эллад Геннадьевич (ws44) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Are there some utils to release Inact memory, which can be viewed by
top-utility? In time all Free Memory flows to Inact Memory, and we
have real problem with performance of our router. After I reboot
server, problem
you might check your bios settings for some weird memory reallocation
but otherwise file a PR on this.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Sparrevohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:12 PM
Subject
-rf -)
after cat spits out 2.18 GB (in the same spot every time), after
restore creates a number of directories (but no files), I get the error:
no memory to extend symbol table
abort? [yn]
I've seen two other posts about similar errors:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.freebsd.questions
On 6 Feb 2007, at 12:23, Bill Moran wrote:
I don't know whether its related - I just got a brand new Dell XPS
710 H2C with a QX6700 - The
system uses the Nvidia 590 chipset - It has 4GB memory and Two GTX
8800 7xx MB
graphics cards even with PAE enabled it only finds 2,5GB - However I
am
In response to Jim Pazarena [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not see any reference to resolving the
786432K of memory above 4Gb ignored anywhere in Google or otherwise.
I see references to it for FreeBSD 4.XX, but I am running 6.2, and have
the same problem.
Is there any easy solution? For a hoot
I need to checkout memory on a remote machine. I see there is memtest and
memtest86 out there. Which one is appropriate for my situation?: CPU is a
dual cpu, dual core SMP Intel Xeon. Can I run either program while the
machine is performing other tasks?**
--
Yudhvir Singh Sidhu
408 375 3134
-Original Message-
Subject: Memory test
I need to checkout memory on a remote machine. I see there is memtest
and
memtest86 out there. Which one is appropriate for my situation?: CPU
is a
dual cpu, dual core SMP Intel Xeon. Can I run either program while the
machine is performing
I do not see any reference to resolving the
786432K of memory above 4Gb ignored anywhere in Google or otherwise.
I see references to it for FreeBSD 4.XX, but I am running 6.2, and have
the same problem.
Is there any easy solution? For a hoot, I installed SuSe 10.2 on my machine
I do not see any reference to resolving the
786432K of memory above 4Gb ignored anywhere in Google or otherwise.
Are you running the i386 version of 6.2-RELEASE? If so, you will need
to enable PAE (recompile the kernel with options PAE), or install the
amd64 version of 6.2 instead. Note
Sorry about the previous message, it was send in error.
After upgrading from 6.2-PRERELEASE to 6.2-STABLE all my servers are
terribly slow, the webservers use only 300Mb memory instead of the
previous 1500Mb. Anything changed between those releases which affects the
memory usage?
FreeBSD
Dear all,
Is there a FBSD command to manage virtual memory? I think my swap size is
now a bit too much used:
last pid: 19824; load averages: 0.06, 0.05, 0.02 up 50+10:00:17
08:54:00
230 processes: 1 running, 227 sleeping, 2 zombie
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.8
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:57:27AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Dear all,
Is there a FBSD command to manage virtual memory? I think my swap size is
now a bit too much used:
last pid: 19824; load averages: 0.06, 0.05, 0.02 up 50+10:00:17
08:54:00
230 processes: 1 running, 227
(wget does not try to fit the whole
file in memory, so it won't be pushing stuff out to swap). Look at the
process sizes in top to see what is using the swap space - something(s)
that is still running is using that 482MB.
I do not see such a process:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES
% and
had been like that for many days.
That should not cause such a thing (wget does not try to fit the whole
file in memory, so it won't be pushing stuff out to swap). Look at the
process sizes in top to see what is using the swap space - something(s)
that is still running is using that 482MB
to my laptop. When I started wget, the swap usage was around 19% and
had been like that for many days.
That should not cause such a thing (wget does not try to fit the whole
file in memory, so it won't be pushing stuff out to swap). Look at the
process sizes in top to see what is using
Dear Kris and all,
I see lots of them; every one in that list is contributinig. If you
add up all those process sizes you'll see where the space is going.
By which I mean the difference between size and res, which indicates
the amount of process memory allocated but not currently resident
Apache processes to use a much
more reasonable amount, like ~~5MB - 8MB and a small number of php-cgi
processes that use ~~20MB or more, saving you memory in the end.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to use a much
more reasonable amount, like ~~5MB - 8MB and a small number of php-cgi
processes that use ~~20MB or more, saving you memory in the end.
Does this mean recompiling Apache? Or is it a question of httpd.conf? From
what I understand it probably involves recompilation?
Thank you
On Saturday 20 January 2007 08:57, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Is there any way to handle swap size usage other than restarting the box?
Yes, you can add swap while the system is running with swapon(8). If you don't
have an empty partition available you could create one with mdconfig(8).
-Pieter
get all Apache processes to use a much
more reasonable amount, like ~~5MB - 8MB and a small number of php-cgi
processes that use ~~20MB or more, saving you memory in the end.
Does this mean recompiling Apache? Or is it a question of httpd.conf? From
what I understand it probably involves
memory allocated but not currently resident in
RAM. This isn't a foolproof method (see e.g. the FAQ entry on
rpc.statd), but it's true in your case.
Basically you are just overloading your system by trying to run
too much at once. Reduce the load or add more RAM.
The problem is I cannot
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:57:27AM +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Dear all,
Is there a FBSD command to manage virtual memory? I think my swap size is
now a bit too much used:
last pid: 19824; load averages: 0.06, 0.05, 0.02 up 50+10:00:17
08:54:00
230 processes: 1 running, 227
Dear all,
| Also remember that swap usage itself is not a bad thing; it just means
Problem solved. I should have thought about that earlier. Yesterday I was
playing with HotSaNIC software to use it on this box. In the end I decided
I didn't like it and I didn't really need it so I removed it
Don't forget that the system also pages to swap space and it takes the
attitude of parking as much as possible out there in case it comes in
to demand again. Ten if it really needs the space for something, it
invalidates the oldest stuff and uses that space.
So, you should really expect
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Don't forget that the system also pages to swap space and it takes the
attitude of parking as much as possible out there in case it comes in
to demand again. Ten if it really needs the space for something, it
invalidates the oldest stuff and uses that space.
So, you
Dear Mailing List,
The application vlc (found in ports) when run on FBSD 5.x and 6.x
behaves as if there's a memory leak somewhere hidden in it. This is
appearing when starting vlc from shell playing a playlist and streaming
video over udp to LAN like so:
vlc --loop playlist.m3u --sout
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Roger Olofsson wrote:
The application vlc (found in ports) when run on FBSD 5.x and 6.x
behaves as if there's a memory leak somewhere hidden in it.
[ ... ]
My question is how do I track down a possible memory leak and would
there be a tool to monitor (from
Alexander Pohoyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything works perfect if the system is started with a memory card
inserted into the reader.
The problem arises when the system is started without the memory card
inserted. Since the reader is built-in (permanently attached to the
motherboard
Lowell Gilbert writes:
Alexander Pohoyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything works perfect if the system is started with a memory card
inserted into the reader.
The problem arises when the system is started without the memory card
inserted. Since the reader is built-in (permanently
Micah wrote:
Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
Lowell Gilbert writes:
Alexander Pohoyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything works perfect if the system is started with a memory card
inserted into the reader.
The problem arises when the system is started without the memory card
Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
Lowell Gilbert writes:
Alexander Pohoyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything works perfect if the system is started with a memory card
inserted into the reader.
The problem arises when the system is started without the memory card
inserted. Since the reader
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:54:08PM +0100, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
Micah wrote:
Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
Lowell Gilbert writes:
Alexander Pohoyda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything works perfect if the system is started with a memory card
inserted into the reader
Everything works perfect if the system is started with a memory card
inserted into the reader.
The problem arises when the system is started without the memory card
inserted. Since the reader is built-in (permanently attached to the
motherboard), it is detected by the system at startup
Hi,
I have a flash memory myflash with 1Gb. Ubuntu Linux and Fedora detects
and mounts it automatically. But I don't know how to mount it in FreeBSD 6.1
.
Can somebody tell me how to mount it?
I wanna know how to mount it in console mode.
Thanks,
--
Robe.
En el verdadero amor
when u plug in ur usb device, i think the kernel will detect it and show
some message in dmesg, then you should use mount_msdos /dev/xxx /mnt,
something like that..
TFC
On 12/28/06, Robe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a flash memory myflash with 1Gb. Ubuntu Linux and Fedora detects
Robe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a flash memory myflash with 1Gb. Ubuntu Linux and Fedora detects
and mounts it automatically. But I don't know how to mount it in FreeBSD 6.1
.
Can somebody tell me how to mount it?
I wanna know how to mount it in console mode.
Try the FreeBSD
I've got it.
Thanx people,
--
Robe.
El verdadero amigo no es el que nos seca las lágrimas sino el que evita que
las derramemos.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Hi!!
I have some problems with running perl script from cron.
My script works with huge log files and it's size grows up to 300-1500Mb. It's
necessity and can't be done in other ways than collecting data into hashes.
When memory usage reaches 256Mb, error happens:
Out of memory during
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
I will receive in few days a new server and I wonder how much
memory FreeBSD is able to manage ? The processors (2) are Intel Xeon
All versions of FreeBSD can handle huge amounts of memory.
If you want to run a 32-bit version with more
On 2006/11/29 22:30, Frank Bonnet seems to have typed:
Hello
I will receive in few days a new server and I wonder how much
memory FreeBSD is able to manage ? The processors (2) are Intel Xeon
Any infos/links welcome
Thank
Assuming that the Xeon processors are the newer 64bit capable
Hello
I will receive in few days a new server and I wonder how much
memory FreeBSD is able to manage ? The processors (2) are Intel Xeon
Any infos/links welcome
Thank
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi all,
I have two older servers that started with 512 MB of RAM.
I want to install two GIGs of RAM.
My swap space is set at 1 GB.
Whan I upgrade to two GB RAM, do I have to increase the swap slice?
-GRant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
In the last episode (Nov 08), Grant Peel said:
I have two older servers that started with 512 MB of RAM.
I want to install two GIGs of RAM.
My swap space is set at 1 GB.
Whan I upgrade to two GB RAM, do I have to increase the swap slice?
Probably not, but it depends on your workload.
Hi,
We're running freebsd 5-4 release and notice that an idle system's free memroy
keeps decreasing. The system has 1 GB memory and the free mem starts at ~700M
and goes down steadily until it hits 2M and stays there. After that bringing
up more apps on the system doesn't seem to make
On Monday 06 November 2006 11:08, Roselyn Lee wrote:
Hi,
We're running freebsd 5-4 release and notice that an idle system's free
memroy keeps decreasing. The system has 1 GB memory and the free mem
starts at ~700M and goes down steadily until it hits 2M and stays there.
After that bringing
In the last episode (Nov 06), Roselyn Lee said:
We're running freebsd 5-4 release and notice that an idle system's
free memroy keeps decreasing. The system has 1 GB memory and the
free mem starts at ~700M and goes down steadily until it hits 2M and
stays there. After that bringing up more
On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 06), Roselyn Lee said:
Does freebsd use memory for disk caching that is not accounted for in
these stats?
Yes, free memory is used as cache. As Free decreases, you will see
Inact, Cache and Buf increase.
Yep. What
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:08:04AM -0800, Roselyn Lee wrote:
Hi,
We're running freebsd 5-4 release and notice that an idle system's free
memroy keeps decreasing. The system has 1 GB memory and the free mem
starts at ~700M and goes down steadily until it hits 2M and stays
I have a new box that I just setup w/ 2 GB of RAM, and installed FreeBSD 6.1
stable (snapshot), with the standard kernel and when I look at the specs, it
only shows 1GB of ram. Is there some sort of kernel option that needs to be
set to allow the full 2 GB to show?
Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:35:25PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
I have a new box that I just setup w/ 2 GB of RAM, and installed FreeBSD 6.1
stable (snapshot), with the standard kernel and when I look at the specs, it
only shows 1GB of ram. Is there some sort of kernel option that needs to be
set
The BIOS sees it OK, but just not the OS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:50 PM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.1 Stable default kernel memory
On Fri, Nov 03
Kennaway
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:50 PM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.1 Stable default kernel memory
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:35:25PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
I have a new box that I just setup w/ 2 GB of RAM, and installed
FreeBSD 6.1 stable
Hi,
I clearly have a problem figuring out how to increase the limits for
memory available to a process and the kernel.
I'm running a Perl app that need lots of memory and I would like to make
around 2G available to it, the box has 4G physical RAM.
Which knob(s) should be tweaked? System
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
I clearly have a problem figuring out how to increase the limits for
memory available to a process and the kernel.
I'm running a Perl app that need lots of memory and I would like to
make around 2G available to it, the box has 4G physical RAM.
Which knob(s
In response to Per olof Ljungmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I clearly have a problem figuring out how to increase the limits for
memory available to a process and the kernel.
I'm running a Perl app that need lots of memory and I would like to make
around 2G available to it, the box has 4G
Bill Moran wrote:
I'm running a Perl app that need lots of memory and I would like to make
around 2G available to it, the box has 4G physical RAM.
Which knob(s) should be tweaked? System is running 6-STABLE from around
1st of October.
This is what I see when the process exits:
Out of memory
Hi,
I would like to know what are exact relations between these 3 memory
information printouts:
top:
Mem: 157M Active, 127M Inact, 60M Wired, 25M Cache, 60M Buf, 125M Free
Swap: 998M Total, 998M Free
sysctl -a | grep Mem:
Virtual Memory: (Total: 78781K, Active 798692K)
Real Memory
Nejc Skoberne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to know what are exact relations between these 3 memory
information printouts:
Did you start by reading the FAQ entry What do the various memory
states displayed by top mean??
___
freebsd-questions
.
So this is the problem description:
I noticed that the free memory function patch
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1123430group_id=5470atid=305470)
was included in Python-2.5.
I built the Python-2.5 port in FreeBSD (6.2-PRELENG, latest ports tree)
but the problem
Hello,
I really don't know whether this is a good idea to forward this message to
ports@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wrote to freebsd-python@ but there's no reply so
far.
So this is the problem description:
I noticed that the free memory function patch
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php
Hello,
I want to increase the max_connections of PostgreSQL from around 40 to
around 100. For this I need to change the Shared Memory and Semaphores
settings.
I followed this link -
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC
and used the proposed values
Hello,
I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
and then if I check
real memory = 3757965312 (3583 MB)
avail
RJ45 wrote:
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
A normal 32bit OS can only address 4GB RAM -- but your system has various
L2 and other caches built into the CPUs
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
RJ45 wrote:
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
A normal 32bit OS can only address 4GB RAM
Since the BIOS reports the memory as ignored, I'd say it is your
motherboard causing the issue. You should check the manufacturer's specs
on the board and see if this is a limit to the board for the memory you are
using. Many system boards have different memory limits based on the actual
RJ45 wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:24:43AM -0600:
Hello,
I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
Hello Everyone,
during my 6.1 installation, I'm getting this error.
atapci1: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controlles port 0x20c8-0x20cf,
0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-
0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci
atapci1: failed to enable memory mapping!
Google didnot help much,
So
On Saturday 02 September 2006 22:39, Viswas Nair wrote:
Been getting this message everytime I boot.
atapci1: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x20d8-0x20df,0x20f0-0x20f3,0x20e0-0x20e7,0x20f4-0x20f7,0x20b0-0x20bf irq 19
at device 31.2 on pci0
atapci1: failed to enable memory mapping!
Any ideas
Been getting this message everytime I boot.
atapci1: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x20d8-0x20df,0x20f0-0x20f3,0x20e0-0x20e7,0x20f4-0x20f7,0x20b0-0x20bf irq 19
at device 31.2 on pci0
atapci1: failed to enable memory mapping!
Any ideas what this means and what can be done to fix it?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a DVD-RW with a directory created with
rsnapshot, but there are some problem with mkisofs: Not enough
memory
# mkisofs -R -J -o /data/rsnap.iso /data/.snapshots
mkisofs: Cannot allocate memory. Not enough memory
I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
able to find much documentation regarding this subject.
It has been reported
701 - 800 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
