Re: mknod within a jail ...

2006-11-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Sunday, November 12, 2006 10:00:54 -0500 Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm playing with DTC right now, within a Jail ... and one of the steps to >> set it up is to run mknod

Re: mknod within a jail ...

2006-11-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Sunday, November 12, 2006 17:11:23 -0500 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any approach that "requires" running mknod is misguided, since you > can't do this outside of devfs on modern FreeBSD. Mounting devfs > (with appropriate rule

Re: mknod within a jail ...

2006-11-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:00:54AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm playing with DTC right now, within a Jail ... and one of the steps to > > set > > it up is to run mknod to create devices for a chroot environment, which, of > > course, fa

Re: mknod within a jail ...

2006-11-12 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm playing with DTC right now, within a Jail ... and one of the steps to set > it up is to run mknod to create devices for a chroot environment, which, of > course, fail in a jail ... > > Is there any way around this? > > Mounting devfs isn't an

mknod within a jail ...

2006-11-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm playing with DTC right now, within a Jail ... and one of the steps to set it up is to run mknod to create devices for a chroot environment, which, of course, fail in a jail ... Is there any way around this? Mounting devfs isn't an option, sinc