Re: mount_nfs not accepting syntax specified by its usage complaint

2008-07-05 Thread perryh
> option 'g' has been "removed temporarily", but usage() hasn't > been updated accordingly. Aha! Removing the "-g 8" fixed it, and the 512-byte read and readdir restrictions seem to be working well (albeit slowly). That a "temporary" removal present in 7.0 has been there at least since 6.1 remin

Re: mount_nfs not accepting syntax specified by its usage complaint

2008-07-05 Thread Mel
On Saturday 05 July 2008 04:10:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How does this command: > > # mount_nfs -dis -g 8 -I 512 -R 3 -r 512 -w 512 solomon:/var/spool/uucp > /solomon/uucp > > not comply with the resulting usage complaint? > > usage: mount_nfs [-234bcdiLlNPsTU] [-a maxreadahead] [-D deadthresh]

mount_nfs not accepting syntax specified by its usage complaint

2008-07-04 Thread perryh
How does this command: # mount_nfs -dis -g 8 -I 512 -R 3 -r 512 -w 512 solomon:/var/spool/uucp /solomon/uucp not comply with the resulting usage complaint? usage: mount_nfs [-234bcdiLlNPsTU] [-a maxreadahead] [-D deadthresh] [-g maxgroups] [-I readdirsize] [-o options] [-R retr