On 12/29/11 12:45, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
On Dec 28, 2011 9:26 PM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote:
And the reason for the whole thread. One of the customers told me that
8.8.8.8 is faster than our own DNS servers which are located on the
same 100 MBit/s LAN with them. I was shocked but it seems true, at
2011/12/29 Victor Sudakov :
> Peter Andreev wrote:
>> >> >> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time
>> >> >> > highly
>> >> >> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
>> >> >> > on this value is lesser.
>> >> >> > So I advice you to keep all
Peter Andreev wrote:
> >> >> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> >> >> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> >> >> > on this value is lesser.
> >> >> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
> >> >>
> >> >> Be it so. Thank you.
>
2011/12/29 Victor Sudakov :
> Peter Andreev wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
>> >> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
>> >> > on this value is lesser.
>> >> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
>> >>
>> >
Peter Andreev wrote:
> >>
> >> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> >> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> >> > on this value is lesser.
> >> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
> >>
> >> Be it so. Thank you.
> >
> > And th
2011/12/29 Victor Sudakov :
> Victor Sudakov wrote:
>>
>> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
>> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
>> > on this value is lesser.
>> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
>>
>> Be it so. Thank yo
On Dec 28, 2011 9:26 PM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote:
> And the reason for the whole thread. One of the customers told me that
> 8.8.8.8 is faster than our own DNS servers which are located on the
> same 100 MBit/s LAN with them. I was shocked but it seems true, at
> least for the answers which are no
Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> > on this value is lesser.
> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
>
> Be it so. Thank you.
And the reason for the whole th
Peter Andreev wrote:
[dd]
> Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> on this value is lesser.
> So I advice you to keep all as is.
Be it so. Thank you.
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RI
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
> >> time, here's your scenario:
> >>
> >> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
> >> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries
> >>
> >> Your cache will start building up and only re
2011/12/28 Damien Fleuriot :
>
>
> On 12/28/11 2:07 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
>>> time, here's your scenario:
>>>
>>> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
>>> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A fo
On 12/28/11 2:07 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
>> time, here's your scenario:
>>
>> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
>> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries
>>
>> Your cache will star
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
> time, here's your scenario:
>
> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries
>
> Your cache will start building up and only responses that are not cached
On 28/12/2011 07:54, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some
> network administrators reading this list know the answer.
>
> Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders?
> Will it work or create an endless loop of DNS
On 12/28/11 8:54 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some
> network administrators reading this list know the answer.
>
> Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders?
> Will it work or create an
Colleagues,
This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some
network administrators reading this list know the answer.
Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders?
Will it work or create an endless loop of DNS queries?
I have customers using severa
16 matches
Mail list logo