Hi Chuck, me again
I'll study the pointers you mentioned, and merely reply what I can for now.
Thank you very much for spending time on this.
>> The delay in my response here was due to pest control in our building
>> and the three-day weekend (I have no li'l-endians at home ;) .
>
> No problem
Paul Seniura wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Hi, Paul--
The delay in my response here was due to pest control in our building
and the three-day weekend (I have no li'l-endians at home ;) .
No problem...and a good job of solving the endian-debate. :-)
Paul Seniura wrote:
My question for this discussion is speci
Hi Chuck,
The delay in my response here was due to pest control in our building
and the three-day weekend (I have no li'l-endians at home ;) .
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi, Paul--
>
> There is little point to crossposting between -questions and -hackers;
> dropping the latter. Actually, <[EMAIL PRO
Richard Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless there is evidence of more recent gcc bugs, that part of the
> handbook should really be removed.
There's plenty of such evidence.
In fact, reports of FreeBSD bugs should be pretty much ignored unless
they can be reproduced with -O.
Paul Seniura wrote:
Chapter 2 of "FreeBSD Developers' Handbook":
| 2.4 Compiling with cc
|
| -O
|Create an optimized version of the executable. The compiler
|performs various clever tricks to try and produce an executable
|that runs faster than normal. You can add a number after the
Hi, Paul--
There is little point to crossposting between -questions and -hackers;
dropping the latter. Actually, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is probably the most
appropriate place...
Paul Seniura wrote:
My question for this discussion is specifically how to prevent
overriding a port's own setting for
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:56:08PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kris,
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:17:03PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi y'all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+='-O' if and only if such a
> > > > parm was not already provid
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:56:08PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
>
> Hi Kris,
>
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:17:03PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi y'all,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+='-O' if and only if such a
> > > parm was not already provided before 'make'
Hi Kris,
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:17:03PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
> >
> > Hi y'all,
> >
> > I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+='-O' if and only if such a
> > parm was not already provided before 'make' actually runs.
> >
> > I had this coded with the single = sign, i.e. without ?=
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:17:03PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
>
> Hi y'all,
>
> I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+='-O' if and only if such a
> parm was not already provided before 'make' actually runs.
>
> I had this coded with the single = sign, i.e. without ?= or +=, but
> the process s
Hi y'all,
I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+='-O' if and only if such a
parm was not already provided before 'make' actually runs.
I had this coded with the single = sign, i.e. without ?= or +=, but
the process still acts as if += was coded anyway, thus tacking on
my -O *after* the port's
11 matches
Mail list logo
