Tilman Linneweh wrote (2004/08/31):
> * Steven Friedrich [Di, 31 Aug 2004 at 22:26 GMT]:
> > I suspect it's due to the compiler on 4.x. Did the KDE port team build
> it on 4.10-STABLE?
> Yes we did.
> You can try to install the package from
> http://rabarber.fruitsalad.org/index.html#a_4-STABLE
>
Yes, I ran pkgdb -F (I didn't use f, don't know what it's for yet).
I fixed those dependencies.
And yep, I have Qt 3.3.3
I'll have to look at arts...
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 05:12 pm, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
> I took this from the announcement on the ports list:
> Packages are available for i
I took this from the announcement on the ports list:
Packages are available for i386 for 4-STABLE and 5-CURRENT
(5.3-BETA) from
http://rabarber.fruitsalad.org
Did you run pkgdb -fF? As I said before, I had to fix the broken
dependencies on kdelibs and kdepim before "portupgrade -pv kde\*
quant
* Steven Friedrich [Di, 31 Aug 2004 at 22:26 GMT]:
> I suspect it's due to the compiler on 4.x. Did the KDE port team build it on
> 4.10-STABLE?
Yes we did.
You can try to install the package from
http://rabarber.fruitsalad.org/index.html#a_4-STABLE
Your compile fails because there is a bogus @
Thanks for the info.
I added CFLAGS and COPTFLAGS to my make.conf, but it still fails to build
kdelibs on two machines. This looks like a valid build break to me. Did you
build it on 4.x or 5.x?
I suspect it's due to the compiler on 4.x. Did the KDE port team build it on
4.10-STABLE?
On T
Hi Steven,
It looks to me like you may be missing something in your make.conf
file. I use:
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
And If you're just upgradeing KDE to 3.3, you can use:
BATCH=yes
Run pkgdb -fF and straighten out any bad dependencies. When I did
the upgrade, after following step
I failed to mention that I'm running 4.10-STABLE on this box.
Also, I have a second box and I cvsupped it and it fails to build kdelibs too.
Only THIS time, I simply went to the port directory,
i.e., /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3 and invoked make. On the other system, I
followed the procedures in UP
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:45:02AM +0530, Subhro wrote:
> First of all, ports like XFree86 and KDE are really not worth
> maintaining from the ports. Packages do much better for these
Hm, that's a matter of personal preference. I prefer ports, despite
the long compile times and the occasional brea
First of all, ports like XFree86 and KDE are really not worth
maintaining from the ports. Packages do much better for these
softwares. If you really want to compile it from the ports tree, then
go ahead.
It seems to me that somehow wrong arguments are being passed to c++ as
a result of which the e
On Monday 30 August 2004 09:54 pm, Subhro wrote:
> cat /etc/make.conf
>
> Regards
> S.
>
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:15:19 -0400, Steven Friedrich
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > KDE 3.3.3 became available today, but kdelibs build fails.
> >
> > gmake[4]: Entering directory
> > `/usr/ports/x11/kdel
cat /etc/make.conf
Regards
S.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:15:19 -0400, Steven Friedrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> KDE 3.3.3 became available today, but kdelibs build fails.
>
> gmake[4]: Entering directory
> `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.0/kioslave/http'
> source='http.cc' object='htt
KDE 3.3.3 became available today, but kdelibs build fails.
gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdelibs-3.3.0/kioslave/http'
source='http.cc' object='http.lo' libtool=yes \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../../admin/depcomp \
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile --
12 matches
Mail list logo
