Re: partly offtopic, but need feed back now.

2010-01-11 Thread Gary Kline
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:59:34PM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010, Jon Radel wrote: > > Gary Kline wrote: > > > ... > > Hif you're doing the standard thing, and porting your phone > > number to the cable company, they'll have to put some equipment of their > > own on

Re: partly offtopic, but need feed back now.

2010-01-11 Thread Gary Kline
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:19:19AM -0500, Jon Radel wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > >according to him, on each one copper circuit, there were two unused wires > >that > >could be used for a second phone number. so that afternoon I had a dialup > >line > >and the house had a voice line. > > Or m

Re: partly offtopic, but need feed back now.

2010-01-11 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010, Jon Radel wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > ... > Hif you're doing the standard thing, and porting your phone > number to the cable company, they'll have to put some equipment of their > own on or in your house. They don't really take ownership of the > "line", just

Re: partly offtopic, but need feed back now.

2010-01-11 Thread Jon Radel
Gary Kline wrote: according to him, on each one copper circuit, there were two unused wires that could be used for a second phone number. so that afternoon I had a dialup line and the house had a voice line. Or more Each POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) line takes one copper pair. The

partly offtopic, but need feed back now.

2010-01-11 Thread Gary Kline
something on the 12th, seattle time, the cable company may control both our voice lines. in '95 when we moved in, two lines were not available by the telco. when they understood that I was physically disabled, the technician came out the next day and gave us our second line. according to him,