man 4 enc
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Edward Carrel wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>> Thinking -pf@ or -net@ would be a better place to discuss this, more chances
>> of getting an answer.
>
> I was wondering about that. I'll send my question to -net@ to start.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Thinking -pf@ or -net@ would be a better place to discuss this, more chances
> of getting an answer.
I was wondering about that. I'll send my question to -net@ to start. Thanks.
> Out of curiosity why not use a gif interface ?
> I had that w
Thinking -pf@ or -net@ would be a better place to discuss this, more chances of
getting an answer.
Out of curiosity why not use a gif interface ?
I had that working just fine with racoon and was able to actually firewall
traffic on it with PF, iirc.__
On 01/03/12 16:17, Ed Carrel wrote:
Hi freebsd-questions,
I am running into a roadblock getting PF to filter traffic on a Netgraph
interface representing an L2TP/IPSec connection. I have done some narrowing
down of the problem, but was hoping to get some advice on figuring out
where to go diggin
Hi freebsd-questions,
I am running into a roadblock getting PF to filter traffic on a Netgraph
interface representing an L2TP/IPSec connection. I have done some narrowing
down of the problem, but was hoping to get some advice on figuring out
where to go digging next, or things to try.
Also, pleas
